The rabbit eye irritation test based on the Draize method is required for the hazard assessment of chemicals and products that may come into contact with the eye. Due to the potential for the suffering of animals and subjectivity of the test, many modifications of the method have been made that involved a reduction in the number of animals and a refinement of techniques. Additionally, there has been significant development of in vitro alternatives. This paper reviews recent advances in the in vivo test and in vitro alternatives, as well as regulatory requirements. While the refinement of in vivo protocols has resulted in a reduction in the number and discomfort on animals, the development of in vitro alternatives could lead to an eventual replacement of animal studies. In view of the inherent simplicity of many in vitro methods, some of which comprise cell cultures, further research into the relevance/mechanism of effects is required. Batteries of in vitro tests, when properly validated, may be considered as replacements for animal testing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BAGLEYD.M., BRUNERL.H., DeSILVAO., COTTINM., O'BRIENK.A.F., UTTLEYM., and WALKERA.P. (1992). “An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo.” Toxicol. In Vitro6: 275-284.
2.
BALLSM., BLAAUBOERB., BRUSICKD., FRAZIERJ., LAMBD., PEMBERTONM., REINHARDTC., ROBERFROIDM., ROSENKRANZH., SCHMIDB., SPIELMANNH., STAMMATIA.L., and WALUME. (1990). “Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedure.” Alternatives to Laboratory Animals18: 313-337.
3.
BORENFREUNDE., and PUERNERJ.A. (1985). “Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption.” Toxicol. Letters24: 119-124.
4.
BRUNERL.H., KAIND.J., ROBERTSD.A., and PARKERR.D. (1991a). “Evaluation of seven in vitro alternatives for ocular safety testing.” Fund. Appl. Pharmacol, 17: 136-149.
5.
BRUNERL.H., MILLERK.R., OWICKJ.C., PARCEJ.W., and MUIRV.C. (1991b). “Testing ocular irritancy in vitro with silicone microphysiometer.” Toxicol. In Vitro5: 277-284.
6.
BRUNERL.H., PARKERR.D., and BRUCER.D. (1992). “Reducing the number of rabbits in the low-volume eye test.” Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 19: 330-335. BURTON, A.B.G., YORK, M., and LAWRENCE, R.S. (1981). “The in vitro assessment of severe eye irritants.” Fd. Cosmet Toxicol.19: 471-480.
7.
CURRENR., MILLERK., GALERD.M., GADS.C., LEONGB., SARGENTE., SHAHP.V., SINAJ., and SUSSMANR.G. (1993). “Testing of 37 compounds from 11-company study in cytotoxicity models used as alternatives to the eye irritation test.” The Toxicologist13: 1772.
8.
DeSOUSAD.J., ROUSEA.A., and SMOLONW.J. (1984). “Statistical consequences of reducing the number of rabbits utilized in eye irritation testing: Data on 67 petrochemicals.” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.76: 234-242.
9.
DRAIZEJ.H., WOODWARDG., and CALVERYH.O. (1944). “Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes.” J. Pharmacol. Expt. Therap.82: 377-390.
10.
DUBINN.H., WOLFFM.C., THOMASC.L., and DiBLASIM.C. (1985). “Prostaglandin production by rat vaginal tissue in vitro in response to ethanol, a mild mucosal irritant.” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.78: 458-463.
11.
European Chemical Industry Ecology and Toxicology Centre (ECETOC). (1988). Monograph No. 11, ECETOC, Brussels, Belgium.
12.
FEDERP.I., LORDOR.A., DIPASQUALEL.C., BAGLEYD.M., CHUDKOWSKIM., DEMETRULIASJ.L., HINTZEK.L., MARENUSK.D., PAPEW., RODDYM., SCHNETZINGERR., SILBERP.M., TEALJ.J., WEISES.L., and GETTINGSS.D. (1991). “The CTFA evaluation of alternatives program: An evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test (Phase 1) hydro-alcoholic formulations; (Part 1) statistical methods in vitro.” Toxicol.4: 231-246.
13.
FRAIZERJ.M. (1990). “Scientific criteria for validation of in vitro toxicity tests.” Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Environmental Monograph No. 36.
14.
FRAZIERJ.M., GADS.C., GOLDBERGA.M., McCULLYJ.P., and MEYERD.R. (1987). “A critical evaluation of alternatives to acute ocular irritation tests.” In: Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Volume 4 (GoldbergA.M. ed.). Mary Ann Liebert, New York, NY. pp. 45-136.
15.
FREEBERGF.E., NIXONG.A., REERP.J., WEAVERJ.E., BRUCER.D., GRIFFITHJ.E., and SANDERSL.W.III (1986). “Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult.” Fund. Appl. Toxicol.7: 626-634.
16.
GALERD.M., LEONGB., SARGENTE., SHAHP.V., SINAP.V., and SUSSMANR.G. (1993). “An 11-company program to evaluate alternatives to the rabbit eye irritation test.” The Toxicologist13: 1770.
17.
GETTINGSD.S., DIPASQUALEL.C., BAGLEYD.M., CHUDKOWSKIM., DEMETRULIASJ.L., FEDERP.I., HINTZEK.L., MARENUSK.D., PAPEW., RODDYM., SCHNETZINGERR., SILBERP., TEALJ.J., and WEISES.L. (1990). “The CTFA evaluation of alternatives program: An evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test (Phase 1) hydro-alcoholic formulations; A preliminary communication.” In Vitro Toxicol.3: 293-302.
18.
GETTINGSS.D., TEALJ.J., BAGLEYD.M., DEMETRULIASJ.L., DIPASQUALEL.C., HINTZEK.L., ROZENM.G., WEISES.L., CHUDKOWSKIM., MARENUSK.D., PAPEW., RODDYM., SCHNETZINGERR., SILBERP.M., GLAZAS.M., and KURTZP.J. (1991). “The CTFA evaluation of alternatives program: An evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test (Phase 1) hydro-alcoholic formulations; (Part 2) Data analysis and biological significance.” In Vitro Toxicol.4: 247-288.
19.
GOLDBERGA.M., and SILBERP.M. (1992). “Status of in vitro ocular irritation testing.” Lens and Eye Toxicity Research9: 161-192.
20.
GORDONV.C., and BERGMANH.C. (1987). “EYETEX™, an in vitro method for evaluation of ocular irritancy.” In: Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 5 (GoldbergA.M. ed.). Mary Ann Liebert, New York, NY. pp. 293-302.
21.
GREENS., CHAMBERSW.A., GUPTAK.C., HILLR.N., HURLEYP.M., LAMBERTL.A., LEEC.C., LEEJ.K., LIUP.T., LOWTHERD.K., ROBERTSC.D., SEABAUGHV.M., SPRINGERJ.A., and WILCOXN.L. (1993). “Criteria for in vitro alternatives for the eye irritation test.” Fd. Chem. Toxic31: 81-85.
22.
GRIFFITHJ.F., NIXONG.A., BRUCER.D., REERP.J., and BANNANE.A. (1980). “Dose-response studies with chemical irritants in the albino rabbit eye as a basis for selecting optimum testing conditions for predicting hazard to the human eye.” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.55: 501-513.
23.
HAGINOS., ITAGAKIH., KATOS., and KOBAYASHIT. (1993). “Further evaluation of the quantitative chorioallantoic membrane test using trypan blue stain to predict the eye irritancy of chemicals.” Toxicol. In Vitro7: 35-39.
24.
HEYWOODR., and JAMESR.W. (1978). “Towards objectivity in the assessment of eye irritation.” J. Soc. Cosmet Chem.29: 25-29.
25.
ITAGAKIH., HAGINOS., KATOS., KOBAYASHIT., and UMEDAM. (1991). “An in vitro alternative to the Draize eye-irritation test: Evaluation of the crystal violet staining method.” Toxicol. In Vitro5: 139-143.
26.
JACARUSOR.B., BARLETTAM.A., CARSONS., and TROMBETTAL.D. (1985). “Release of histamine from rat peritoneal cells in vitro as an index of irritation potential.” J. Toxicol.-Cut. Ocular Toxicol.4: 39-48.
27.
KLOPMANG., PTCHELINTSEVD., FRIERSONM., PENNISIS., RENSKERSK., and DICKENSM. (1993). “Multiple computer automated structure evaluation methodology as an alternative to in vivo eye irritation testing.” Alternatives to Laboratory Animals21: 14-27.
28.
LAMBERTL.A., CHAMBERSW.A., GREENS., GUPTAK.C., HILLR.N., HURLEYP.M., LEEC.C., LEEJ.K., LIUP.T., LOWTHERD.K., ROBERTSC.D., SEABAUGHV.M., SPRINGERJ.A., and WILCOXN.L. (1993). “The use of low-volume dosing in the eye irritation test.” Fd. Chem. Toxicol.31: 99-103.
29.
LUEPKEN.P. (1985). “Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential.” Fd. Cosmet. Toxicol.23: 287-291.
30.
MUIRC.K. (1985). “Opacity of bovine cornea in vitro induced by surfactants and industrial chemicals compared with ocular irritancy in vivo. Toxicol. Letters24: 157-162.
31.
NORTH-ROOTH., YACKOVICHF., DEMETRULIASJ., GACULAN., and HEINZEJ.E. (1985). “Prediction of the eye irritation potential of shampoos using the in vitro SIRC toxicity test.” Fd. Chem. Toxic.23: 271-273.
32.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1987). OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 405, Acute Eye Irritation and Corrosion.
33.
PAPEW.J.W., PFANNENBECKERU., and HOPPEU. (1987). “Validation of the red blood test system in vitro assay for the rapid screen of irritation potential of surfactants.” Mol. Toxicol.1: 525-536.
34.
RICHIEJ.M., and GREENEN.M. (1990). “Local anaesthetics.” In: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 8th Ed. (GilmanA.G., RallT.W., NiesA.S., and TaylorP. eds.). Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY. pp. 311-331.
SEABAUGHV.M., BAYARDS.P., OSTERBERGR.E., PORTERW.K., McCAULLEYD.F., HOHEISELC.A., HEHIRR.M., and BIERBOWERG.W. (1977). “Detergent toxicity survey.” Am. J. Pub. Health67: 367-369.
37.
SHAWA.J., CLOTHIERR.H., and BALLSM. (1990). “Loss of trans-epithelial impermebility of a confluent monolayer of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells as a determinant of ocular irritancy potential.” Alternatives to Laboratory Animals18: 145-151.
38.
SINAJ.F., GAUTHERONP., SUSSMANR.G., CURRENR., MILLERK., GALERD.M., GADS.C., LEONGB., SARGENTE., and SHAHR.V. (1993). “Testing of 37 compounds from 11-company study in three in vitro tests and SAR computer-based model for evaluation as alternatives to the eye irritation test.” The Toxicologist13: 1771.
39.
SIVAKJ.G., STUARTD.D., HERBERTK.L., VAN OOSTROMJ.A., and SEGALL. (1992). “Optical properties of the cultured bovine ocular lens as an in vitro alternative to the Draize Eye Toxicity Test: Preliminary validation for alcohols.” Toxicol. Methods12: 280-294.
40.
TALSMAD.M., LEACHC.L., HATOUMN.S., GIBBONSR.D., ROGERJ.C., and GARVINP.J. (1988). “Reducing the number of rabbits in the Draize Eye Irritancy Test: A statistical analysis of 155 studies conducted over 6 years.” Fund. Appl. Toxicol.10: 146-153.
41.
United Kingdom/European Economic Community (UK/EEC). (1993). “Further steps towards replacing the Draize Eye.” Alternatives to Laboratory Animals21: 127-128.
42.
WILLIAMSS.J. (1984). “Prediction of ocular irritancy potential from dermal irritation test results.” Fd. Chem. Toxicol.22: 157-161.
