ArmitageP., and AllenI. (1950). Methods for estimating the LD50 in quantal response data.J. Hyg. Camb.48: 298–322.
2.
BelsleyA.D., KuhE., WelschR.E. (1980). Regression Diagnostics.John Wiley and Sons, NY.
3.
BusseH. (1982). Statistical Aspects of LD50, in Quality Assurance of Toxicology Data (QATD) (Hunter, W.J. and Morris, C., eds.), Commission of the European Communities Report EUR7270 EN: 123–124, Luxembourg.
4.
CraigP.N. (1973). Comparison of Hansch and Free-Wilson approaches to structure-activity correlations.Adv. in Chem.114: 115–129.
5.
DixonW.J., and BrownM.B. (1979). Biomedical Computer Programs, P-Series. university of California Press, Berkeley.
6.
EakinD.L., HydeE., and ParkerG. (1974). The crossbow system.Pesticide Science5: 319–326.
7.
EnsleinK., and CraigP.N. (1978). A toxicity estimation model.J. Environ. Path.-Tox.2: 115–121.
8.
EnsleinK., LanderT.R., TombM.E., and LandisW.G. (1981). Mutagenicity (Ames):A Structure-Activity Model (in press).
9.
EnsleinK., and CraigP.N. (1981). Carcinogenesis: A predictive structure-activity model.J. Tox. Environ. Health10: 521–530.
10.
EnsleinK., LanderT.R., and StrangeJ.R. (1982). Teratogenesis: A Statistical Structure-Activity Model (in press).
11.
EnsleinK., and CraigP.N. (1982). More on LD50 values.Chem. and Eng. News60(35): 2.
12.
FinneyD.J. (1971). Probit Analysis, 3rd edition; Cambridge University Press.
13.
GriffithJ.F. (1964). Interlaboratory variations in the determination of acute oral LD50.Toxicol. Applied Pharmacol.6: 726–730.
14.
HanschC., and LeoA J. (1979). “Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology,”John Wiley and Sons, NY.
15.
HunterW.J., LingkW., and RechtP. (1978). An Intercomparison Study Conducted by the Commission of the European Communities on the Determination of the Single Administration of Toxicity in Rats.Commission of the European Communities, Health and Safety Directorate, Luxembourg.
16.
JursP.C. (1979). Computer-assisted studies of chemical carcinogens—a heterogenic data set.J. Med. Chem.22: 476–483.
17.
LewisR.J.Sr. (1979). Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Cincinnati, OH 45226. dhew (miosh) Publication No. 79–100.
18.
LingkW. (1982). European Community Cooperative Study to Determine Acute Oral Toxicity in Rats—Preliminary Results. In QTAD: 103–114.
19.
LitchfieldJ.J., and WilcoxonF. (1949). A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap.96: 99–113.
20.
MarquardtD.W., and SneeR.D. (1975). Ridge regression in practice.Amer. Statistician29: 3–20.
21.
MartinY.C. (1978). Quantitative Drug Design, A Critical Introduction.Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY.
22.
PurcellW.P. (1973). Strategy of Drug Design— A Guide to Biological Activity.John Wiley and Sons, NY.
23.
RekkerR.F. (1980). LD50 Values: Are They About to Become Predictable?Trends Pharmacol. Sci.: 383–4.
24.
RekkerR.F. (1980). LD50 values by computer.Chem. and Eng. News60(29): 58.
25.
RowanA.N. (1981). The LD50, Test: A Critique and Suggestions for Alternatives.Pharmaceutical Technology5: 65–94.
26.
SmithE.G., and BakerP.A. (1975). The Wiswesser-Line Formula notation (wln).Chemical Information Management, Inc.,Cherry Hill, NJ.
27.
SmythH.F., and CarpenterC.P. (1944). The place of the Range-Finding Test in the industrial toxicology laboratory.J. Indust. Hygiene and Toxicology.26: 269.
28.
SmythH.F., and CarpenterC.P. (1948). Further experience with the Range-Finding Test in the industrial toxicology laboratory.J. Indust. Hygiene and Toxicology30: 63.
29.
SmythH.F., CarpenterC.P., and DeilC.S. (1951). Range-Finding toxicity data: List IV.AMA Arch. Ind. Hygiene and Occ. Med.4: 119–122.
30.
WishnokJ.S., and ArcherM.C. (1976). Structure-activity relationships in nitrosamine carcinogenesis.Br. J. Cancer33: 307–311.
31.
WishnokJ.S., ArcherM.C., EdelmanE.S., and RandW.M. (1978). Nitrosamine carcinogenicity: A quantitative Hansch-Taft structure-activity relationship.Chem.-Biol. Interactions20: 43–54.
32.
ZbindenG., and Flury-RoversiM. (1981). Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances.Arch. Toxicol.47: 77–99.