Accidental or intentional releases of toxic gases can have significant public health consequences and emergency resource demands. Management of exposed individuals during hazardous material incidents should be risk and evidence based, but there are knowledge gaps in relation to dermal absorption of gases and management advice for potentially exposed individuals. Using a modified Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in vitro toxicology protocol with human donor skin, this article reports on two common and odorous chemicals, hydrogen sulphide and phosphine. Results show that undamaged human skin provides a good barrier to hydrogen sulphide (up to 800 ppm) and phosphine (up to 1000 ppm) penetration for up to 30 min exposures, with little variability in the presence of clothing or in elevated temperature and humidity conditions. A practical guideline template for skin decontamination has been developed, and implications of the research for first responders are outlined.
BakerDJ (2010) Mass Casualties and Health Care following the Release of Toxic Chemicals or Radioactive Material. WP5 Final Report, EU Project Number 2007209. Paris: Executive Agency for Health and Consumers, European Commission.
2.
BronaughRStewartRSimonM (1986) Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies VII: use of excised human skin. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences75: 1094–1097.
3.
ByfordT (2009) Environmental health criteria 235: dermal absorption. International Journal of Environmental Studies66: 662–663.
4.
ChanHZhaiHHuiX. (2013) Skin decontamination: principles and perspectives. Toxicology and Industrial Health10: 955–968.
5.
ChilcottR (2009) An overview of the Health Protection Agency’s Research and Development Programme on Decontamination. Chemical Hazards Poisons Report15: 26–28.
6.
ChilcottR (2014) Managing mass casualties and decontamination. Environment International72: 37–45.
7.
DaviesDWardRHeylingsJ (2004) Multi-species assessment of electrical resistance as a skin integrity marker for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies. Toxicology In Vitro18: 351–358.
8.
DiembeckWBeckHBenech-KiefferF. (1999) Test guidelines for in vitro assessment of dermal absorption and percutaneous penetration of cosmetic ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology37: 191–205.
9.
EdwardsJPisanielloDBartonR. (2003) Hazardous materials emergency incidents in South Australia, 1997–2000. Applied Environmental Science and Public Health1: 63–67.
10.
FasanoWHinderliterP (2004) The Tinsley LCR Databridge Model 6401 and electrical impedance measurements to evaluate skin integrity in vitro. Toxicology In Vitro18: 725–729.
11.
FatovichDGraydonRPrenticeD. (1992) Case report: phosphine gas poisoning. Emergency Medicine4: 141–198.
12.
FeldmanR (2010) Chemical agent simulant release from clothing following vapor exposure. Academic Emergency Medicine17: 221–224.
13.
GaskinSPisanielloDEdwardsJ. (2013a) Application of skin contamination studies of ammonia gas for management of hazardous material incidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials252–253: 338–346.
14.
GaskinSPisanielloDEdwardsJ. (2013b) Chlorine and hydrogen cyanide gas interactions with human skin: in vitro studies to inform skin permeation and decontamination in HAZMAT incidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials262: 759–765.
15.
GaskinSPisanielloDEdwardsJ. (2014) In-vitro methods for testing dermal absorption and penetration of toxic gases. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods24: 70–72.
16.
International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) (1997) Phosphine. Poisons Information Monograph 865. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Geneva: WHO.
17.
KirkMDeatonM (2007) Bringing order out of chaos: effective strategies for medical response to mass chemical exposure. Emergency Medicine Clinics North America25: 527–548.
18.
LawrenceJ (1997) Electrical resistance and tritiated water permeability as indicators of barrier integrity of in vitro human skin. Toxicology In Vitro11: 241–249.
19.
LevitinHSiegelsonHDickinsonS. (2003) Decontamination of mass casualties—re-evaluating existing dogma. Prehospital Disaster Medicine18: 200–207.
20.
MeinekeVGraessleDHSchanbacherE (2010) Mass Casualties and Health Care following the Release of Toxic Chemicals or Radioactive Material. Final Report EU Project 2007209. Paris: Executive Agency for Health and Consumers, European Commission.
21.
MoriiDMiyagataniYNakamaeN. (2010) Japanese experience hydrogen sulfide: the suicide craze in 2008. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology5: 28.
22.
NathNBhattacharyaITuckA (2011) Mechanisms of phosphine toxicity. Journal of Toxicology2011: 9.
23.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (1994) Method 6002: Phosphine. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM). 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control.
24.
OkumuraTSuzukiKFukudaA. (1998) The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, part 2: hospital response. Academy of Emergency Medicine5: 618–624.
25.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004) Guidance document for the conduct of skin absorption studies. OECD series on Testing and Assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
26.
PhuongCMaibachH (2015) Recent knowledge: concepts of dermal absorption in relation to skin decontamination. Journal of Applied Toxicology36: 5–9.
27.
PisanielloD (1988) The generation of test atmospheres for occupational hygiene laboratory evaluation of organic vapour monitoring devices. Report prepared for the Occupational Health and Radiation Control Branch, South Australian Health Commission. Adelaide: South Australian Government. Available at: www.adelaide.edu.au/oeh/research/testatmon88.pdf
28.
SchutzeW (1927) Deleterious action through the skin of poisonous gases at high concentrations (carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, hydrocyanic acid, and aniline. Archives of Hygiene98: 70.
29.
Standards Australia (2005) Methods of test for textiles. Method 5.4: Dimensional change—Domestic washing and drying procedures for textile testing (ISO 6330:2000, MOD). Sydney: Standards Australia.
30.
SudakinD (2005) Occupational exposure to aluminium phosphide and phosphine gas? A suspected case report and review of the literature. Human and Experimental Toxicology24: 27–33.
31.
van SickleDWenckMBelflowerA. (2009) Acute health effects after exposure to chlorine gas released after a train derailment. American Journal of Emergency Medicine27: 1–7.
32.
WaltonDWitherspoonM (1925) Skin absorption of certain gases. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics26: 315–324.
33.
WhealMFowlesTPalmerL (2011) A cost-effective acid digestion method using closed polypropylene tubes for inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis of plant essential elements. Analytical Methods3: 2854–2863.
34.
YantW (1930) Hydrogen sulphide in industry occurrence, effects, and treatment. American Journal of Public Health20: 598.
