Formaldehyde (FA) is a chemical widely used in the furniture industry and has been classified as a potential human carcinogen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occupational exposure of workers to FA at a furniture manufacturing facility and the relationship between environmental concentrations of FA, formic acid concentration in urine, and DNA damage. The sample consisted of 46 workers exposed to FA and a control group of 45 individuals with no history of occupational exposure. Environmental concentrations of FA were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Urinary formic acid concentrations were determined by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector. DNA damage was evaluated by the micronucleus (MN) test performed in exfoliated buccal cells and comet assay with venous blood. The 8-h time-weighted average of FA environmental concentration ranged from 0.03 ppm to 0.09 ppm at the plant, and the control group was exposed to a mean concentration of 0.012 ppm. Workers exposed to higher environmental FA concentrations had urinary formic acid concentrations significantly different from those of controls (31.85 mg L−1 vs. 19.35 mg L−, p ≤ 0.01 Mann–Whitney test). Significant differences were found between control and exposed groups for the following parameters: damage frequency and damage index in the comet assay, frequency of binucleated cells in the MN test, and formic acid concentration in urine. The frequency of micronuclei, nuclear buds, and karyorrhexis did not differ between groups. There was a positive correlation between environmental concentrations of FA and damage frequency (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient [rs] = 0.24), damage index (rs = 0.21), binucleated cells (rs = 0.34), and urinary formic acid concentration (rs = 0.63). The results indicate that, although workers in the furniture manufacturing facility were exposed to low environmental levels of FA, this agent contributes to the observed increase in cytogenetic damage. In addition, urinary formic acid concentrations correlated strongly with occupational exposure to FA.
AlvesCAAcioleSDG (2012) Formaldeído em escolas: uma revisão. Química Nova35(10): 2025–2039.
2.
AndersenMEClewellHJBermundezE. (2010) Formaldehyde: integrating dosimetry, cytotoxicity and genomics to understand dose-dependent transitions for an endogenous compound. Toxicological Sciences118: 716–731.
3.
AndersonDYuTWPhillipsBJ. (1994) The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying agents on oxygen-radical-generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the COMET assay. Mutation Research307(1): 261–271.
4.
United States Department of Health and Human Services (ATSDR) (1999) Public Health Service—Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry—Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde. Atlanta: United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp111.pdf (accessed 10 August 2014).
5.
BallarinCSartoFGiacomelliL. (1992) Micronucleated cells in nasal mucosa of formaldehyde-exposed workers. Mutation Research280(1): 1–7.
6.
BolognesiCKnasmuellerSNersesyanA. (2013) The HUMNxl scoring criteria for different cell types and nuclear anomalies in the buccal micronucleus cytome assay: an update and expanded photogallery. Mutation Research753(2): 100–113.
7.
BonassiSFenechMLandoC. (2001) Human micronucleus project: international database comparison for results with cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes. I. Effect of laboratory protocol, scoring criteria, and host factor son the frequency of micronuclei. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis37: 31–45.
8.
BonassiSNeriMLandoC. (2003) Effect of smoking habit on the frequency of micronuclei in human lymphocytes: results from the Human MicroNucleus project. Mutation Research543(2): 155–166.
9.
BonoRVincentiMSchiliroT. (2006) N-Methylenvaline in a group of subjects occupationally exposed to formaldehyde. Toxicology Letters161(1): 10–17.
10.
BonoRRomanazziVPirroV. (2012) Formaldehyde and tobacco smoke as alkylating agents: the formation of N-methylenvaline in pathologists and in plastic laminate workers. Science of the Total Environment414: 701–707.
11.
BurgazSCakmakGErdemO. (2001) Micronuclei frequencies in exfoliated nasal mucosa cells from pathology and anatomy laboratory workers exposed to formaldehyde. Neoplasma48(2): 144–147.
CoelhoMCSDM (2009) O formaldeído em ambiente laboral: determinação do ácido fórmico em urina de trabalhadores de uma fábrica produtora de formaldeído. Dissertation in Analytical Toxicology, Clinical and Forensic. Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto.
14.
CollinsARAzquetaA (2012) DNA repair as a biomarker in human biomonitoring studies: further applications of the comet assay. Mutation Research736(1–2): 122–129.
15.
CollinsAROscozAABrunborgG. (2008) The comet assay: topical issues. Mutagenesis23(3): 143–151.
16.
CostaSCoelhoPCostaC. (2008) Genotoxic damage in pathology anatomy laboratory workers exposed to formaldehyde. Toxicology252(1–3): 40–48.
17.
DusinkaMCollinsAR (2008) The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene environment interactions. Mutagenesis23(3): 191–205.
18.
FenechMHollandNChangWP. (1999) The human micronucleus project—an international collaborative study on the use of the micronucleus technique for measuring DNA damage in humans. Mutation Research428(1–2): 271–283.
19.
GinsbergGFoosBDzubowRB. (2010) Options for incorporating children’s inhaled dose into human health risk assessment. Inhalation Toxicology22(8): 627–647.
20.
GoyerNBéginDBeaudryC (2006) Prevention guide: Formaldehyde in the workplace. Montreal: Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail.
21.
GuimarãesJRFarahCRTManieroMG. (2012) Degradation of formaldehyde by advanced oxidation processes. Journal of Environmental Management107: 96–101.
22.
HarrisDRobinsonJR (1992) Drug delivery via the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences81(1): 1–10.
23.
HollandNBolognesiCKirsch-VoldersM. (2008) The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for 20 biomonitoring DNA damage: the HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutation Research659: 93–108.
24.
IARC, Working Group (2006) Evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxypropan-2-ol. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans88: 1–478.
25.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012) Formaldehyde. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to human volume 100F Chemical Agents and Related Occupations. Lyon: IARC, 2012, 401–436(Chapter 4).
26.
JustWZellerJRiegertC. (2011) Genetic polymorphisms in the formaldehyde dehydrogenase gene and their biological significance. Toxicology Letters207(2): 121–127.
27.
LadeiraCViegasSCarolinoE. (2011) Genotoxicity biomarkers in occupational exposure to formaldehyde – The case of histopathology laboratories. Mutation Research721(1): 15–20.
28.
LorenzoYCostaSColinsAR. (2013) The comet assay, DNA damage, DNA repair and cytotocity: hedgehogs are not always dead. Mutagenesis28: 427–432.
29.
MautempoCBastosMDLCarvalhoF. (2010) Determination of formic acid in urine of workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde. Toxicology Letters196: S74–S74.
30.
MerkOSpeitG (1998) Significance of formaldehyde-induced DNA–protein crosslinks for mutagenesis. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis32(3): 260–268.
31.
MøllerP (2006) The alkaline comet assay: towards validation in biomonitoring of DNA damaging exposures. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology98: 336–345.
32.
NadinSBVargas-RoigLMCioccaDR (2001) A staining method for single-cell gel assay. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry49(9): 1183–1186.
33.
National Toxicology Program (2010) Final report on carcinogens background document for formaldehyde. Rep Carcinog BackgrDoc 10-5981: i–i512.
34.
NersesyanAMuradyanRKundiM. (2011) Impact of smoking on the frequencies of micronuclei and other nuclear abnormalities in exfoliated oral cells: a comparative study with different cigarette types. Mutagenesis26(2): 295–301.
35.
NIOSH, Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2005) Available at: www.cdc.gov/NIOSH/npg/npgd0293.html (accessed 10 August 2014).
36.
OrsièreTSari-MinodierIIarmarcovaiG. (2006) Genotoxic risk assessment of pathology and anatomy laboratory workers exposed to formaldehyde by use of personal air sampling and analysis of DNA damage in peripheral lymphocytes. Mutation Research605(1–2): 30–41.
PeteffiGPSilvaLBHahnRZ. (2015) Simple and fast headspace-gas chromatographic determination of formic acid in urine: application to the assessment of occupational exposure to formaldehyde. Applied Research in Toxicology1(1): 40–45.
39.
PitarqueMVaglenovANoskoM. (1999) Evaluation of DBA damage by the comet assay in shoe workers exposed to toluene and other organic solvents. Mutation Research441(1): 115–127.
40.
ShojaeiAH (1998) Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences1(1): 15–30.
41.
SpeitGSchmidO (2006) Local genotoxic effects of formaldehyde in humans measured by the micronucleus test with exfoliated epithelial cells. Mutation Research613(1): 1–9.
42.
SpeitGKühnerSLinsenmeyerR. (2011) Does formaldehyde induce aneuploidy?Mutagenesis26(6): 805–811.
43.
SpeitGLinsenmeyerRDuongG. (2014) Investigations on potencial co-mutagenic effects of formaldehyde. Mutation Research760: 48–56.
44.
SurudaASchultePBoenigerM. (1993) Cytogenetic effects of formaldehyde exposure in students of mortuary science. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention2(5): 453–460.
45.
TiceRRAgurellEAndersonD. (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis35(3): 206–221.
46.
ThomasPHarveySGrunerT. (2007) The buccal cytome and micronucleus frequency is substantially altered in Down’s syndrome and normal ageing compared to young healthy controls. Mutation Research638(1–2): 37–47.
47.
TolbertPEShyCMAllenJW (1992) Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutation Research271(1): 69–77.
48.
TornqvistMFredCHaglundJ. (2002) Protein adducts: quantitative and qualitative aspects of their formation, analysis and applications. Journal of Chromatography B778(1–2): 279–308.
49.
ViegasSLadeiraCNunesC. (2010) Genotoxic effects in occupational exposure to formaldehyde: a study in anatomy and pathology laboratories and formaldehyde-resins production. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology5(25): 1–8.
50.
YeXYanWXieH. (2005) Cytogenetic analysis of nasal mucosa cells and lymphocytes from high-level long-term formaldehyde exposed workers and low-level short-term exposed waiters. Mutation Research588(1): 22–27.
51.
ZietkiewiczEWojdaAWittM (2009) Cytogenetic perspective of ageing and longevity in men and women. Journal of Applied Genetics50(3): 261–273.
52.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants. Bonn: The WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, TheWorld Health Organization.
53.
WojdaAZietkiewiczEWittM (2007) Effects of age and gender on micronucleus and chromosome nondisjunction frequencies in centenarians and younger subjects. Mutagenesis22(3): 195–200.
