Skin decontamination is the primary intervention needed in chemical, biological and radiological exposures, involving immediate removal of the contaminant from the skin performed in the most efficient way. The most readily available decontamination system on a practical basis is washing with soap and water or water only. Timely use of flushing with copious amounts of water may physically remove the contaminant. However, this traditional method may not be completely effective, and contaminants left on the skin after traditional washing procedures can have toxic consequences. This article focuses on the principles and practices of skin decontamination.
Adsorption (2009) Columbia University Encyclopedia. 9th ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, p. 590.
3.
AnanthapadmanabhanKPMooreDJSubramanyanKMisraMMeyerF (2004) Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and technology of mild cleansing. Dermatologic Therapy17: 16–25.
4.
BashirSJChewALAnigboguADreherFMaibachHI (2001) Physical and physiological effects of stratum corneum tape stripping. Skin Research and Technology7: 40–48.
5.
BerghMMagnussonKNilssonJLKarlbergA (1998) Formation of formaldehyde and peroxidases by air oxidation of high purity polyoxyethylene surfactants. Contact Dermatitis39: 14–20.
6.
BoenigerM (2005) Skin Decontamination of Chemical Exposures. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety.
7.
BosJDMeinardiMM (2000) The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Experimental Dermatology9: 165–169.
8.
BuryJN (1986) Environmental contact dermatitis from perfumes in soap. Medical Journal of Australia145: 160–162.
9.
ChilcottRPDaltonCHHillIDavisonCMBlohmKLClarksonED. (2005) In vivo skin absorption and distribution of the nerve agent VX (O-ethyl-S-[2(diisopropylamino)ethyl] methylphosphonothioate) in the domestic white pig. Human and Experimental Toxicology24: 347–352.
10.
ChilcottRPJennerJHotchkissSARiceP (2001) In vitro skin absorption and decontamination of sulphur mustard: comparison of human and pig-ear skin. Journal of Applied Toxicology21: 279–283.
11.
CumberbatchMScottRCBasketterDAScholesEWHiltonJDearmanRJ. (1993) Influence of sodium lauryl sulphate on 2,4-dinitrochlorbenzene-induced lymph node activation. Toxicology77: 181–191.
12.
DellarcoMJBuckleyTJSapkotaACardelloNKlingnerTD (2000) A Rational Approach to Skin Decontamination. Orlando, FL: American Industrial Hygiene Conference.
13.
DorandeuFTaysseLBoudryIFoquinAHérodinFMathieuJ. (2010) Cutaneous challenge with chemical warfare agents in the SKH-1 hairless mouse. (I) Development of a model for screening studies in skin decontamination and protection. Human and Experimental Toxicology30(6): 470–490.
14.
DreherFModjtahediBSModjtahediSPMaibachHI (2005) Quantification of stratum corneum removal by adhesive tape stripping by total protein assay in 96-well microplates. Skin Research and Technology11: 97–101.
15.
Escobar-ChavezJJMerino-SanjuanVLopez-CervantesMUrban-MorlanZPinon-SegundoEQuintanar-GuerreroD. (2008) The tape-stripping technique as a method for drug quantification in the skin. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science11: 104–130.
FeldmannRJMaibachHI (1974a) Occupational Exposure to Pesticides. Report for the Federal Task Group on Occupational Exposure to Pesticides. Washington, DC, pp. 122–127.
18.
FeldmannRJMaibachHI (1974b) Percutaneous penetration of some pesticides and herbicides in man. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology2: 88–99.
19.
FlyvolmMAMennéT (1992) Allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde. A case study focussing on sources of formaldehyde exposure. Contact Dermatitis27: 27–36.
20.
HallAMaibachHI (2006) Water decontamination of chemical skin/eye splashes: a critical review. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology25: 67–83.
21.
HeydornSMenneTJohansenJD (2003) Fragrance allergy and hand eczema—a review. Contact Dermatitis48: 59–66.
22.
HoustonMHendricksonRG (2005) Decontamination. Critical Care Clinics21: 653–667.
23.
HurstCR (1997) Decontamination. In: SidellFRTakafujiETFranzDR (eds) Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army, pp. 351–360.
KarlbergATBodinAMaturaM (2003) Allergenic activity of an air-oxidized ethoxylated surfactant. Contact Dermatitis49: 241–247.
26.
KorinthGGöenTSchallerKHDrexlerH (2007) Discrepancies between different rat models for the assessment of percutaneous penetration of hazardous substances. Archives of Toxicology81: 833–840.
27.
LeeDKorzunT (2008) Skin decontamination. In: KingCHenretigFM (eds) Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Procedures. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 1179–1184.
28.
LevitinHWSiegelsonHJDickinsonSHalpernPHaraguchiYNoceraA. (2003) Decontamination of mass casualties—re-evaluating existing dogma. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine18: 200–207.
29.
LiLF (2008) A study of the sensitization rate to cocamidopropyl betaine in patients patch tested in a university hospital of Beijing. Contact Dermatitis58: 24–27.
30.
LokeWKUSHLimJSTayGSKohCH (1999) Wet decontamination-induced stratum corneum hydration--effects on the skin barrier function to diethylmalonate. Journal of Applied Toxicology19: 285–290.
31.
MaibachHIFeldmanRJMilbyTHSeratWF (1971) Regional variation in percutaneous penetration in man. Pesticides. Archives of Environmental Health23: 208–211.
32.
MerianosJJ (2001) Surface-active-agents. In: BlockSS (ed) Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 283–320.
33.
MerrickMVSimpsonJDLiddellS (1982) Skin decontamination—a comparison of four methods. British Journal of Radiology55: 317–318.
34.
MoodyRPMaibachHI (2006) Skin decontamination: importance of the wash-in effect. Food and Chemical Toxicology44: 1783–1788.
35.
MoorePHJrMettlerFAJr (1980) Skin decontamination of commonly used medical radionuclides. Journal of Nuclear Medicine21: 475–476.
36.
MowadCM (2000) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by two parabens: two case reports and review. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis11: 53–56.
37.
Nylander-FrenchLA (2000) A tape-stripping method for measuring dermal exposure to multifunctional acrylates. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene44: 645–651.
Osmotic pressure (2009) Columbia University Encyclopedia. 9th ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, p. 36252.
40.
RougierALotteCMaibachHI (1987) In vivo percutaneous penetration of some organic compounds related to anatomic site in humans: predictive assessment by the stripping method. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences76: 451–454.
41.
SimonGAMaibachHI (2000) The pig as an experimental animal model of percutaneous permeation in man: qualitative and quantitative observations—an overview. Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Physiology13: 229–234.
42.
SlotoschCMKampfGLofflerH (2007) Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis57: 235–241.
43.
TanfordC (1994) Macromolecules. Protein Science3: 857–861.
44.
TaysseLDorandeuFDaulonSFoquinAPerrierNLallementG. (2011) Cutaneous challenge with chemical warfare agents in the SKH-1 hairless mouse (II): effects of some currently used skin decontaminants (RSDL and Fuller's earth) against liquid sulphur mustard and VX exposure. Human & Experimental Toxicology30: 491–498.
45.
TicknerJFriarJCreelyKSCherrieJWPrydeDEKingstonJ (2005) The development of the EASE model. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene49: 103–110.
Van Der MerweDRiviereJE (2005) Comparative studies on the effects of water, ethanol and water/ethanol mixtures on chemical partitioning into porcine skin stratum corneum and silastic membrane. Toxicology In Vitro19: 69–77.
48.
Van Wendel De JoodeBVermeulenRVan HemmenJJFransmanWKromhoutH (2005) Accuracy of a semi-quantitative method for Dermal Exposure Assessment (DREAM). Occupational and Environmental Medicine62: 623–632.
49.
VanbeverRPrausnitzMRPreatV (1997) Macromolecules as novel transdermal transport enhancers for skin electroporation. Pharmaceutical Research14: 638–644.
50.
WeaverJC (1995) Electroporation theory. Concepts and mechanisms. Methods in Molecular Biology48: 3–28.
51.
WesterRC (1995) Twenty absorbing years. In: SurberCElsnerPBircherAJ (eds) Exogenous Dermatology (Advances in Skin-Related Allergology, Bioengineering, Pharmacology, and Toxicology). Karger: Basel, pp. 112–113.
52.
WesterRCHuiXHewittPGHostynekJKrauserSChanT. (2002) Polymers effect on estradiol partition coefficient between powdered human stratum corneum. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences91: 2642–2645.
53.
WesterRCHuiXLandryTMaibachHI (1999) In vivo skin decontamination of methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI): soap and water ineffective compared to polypropylene glycol, polyglycol-based cleanser, and corn oil. Toxicological Sciences48: 1–4.
54.
WesterRCMaibachHI (2002) Dermal decontamination and percutaneous absorption. In: BronaughRLMaibachHI (eds) Topical Absorption of Dermatologic Product. New York, NY: Marcel Decker, Inc, pp 121–135.
55.
YasudaHHondaSYamamotoOAsahiM (1999) Therapeutic effect of topical calcium gluconate for hydrofluoric acid burn--time limit for the start of the treatment. Journal of UOEH21: 209–216.
56.
ZhaiHBarbadilloSHuiXMaibachHI (2007) In vitro model for decontamination of human skin: formaldehyde. Food and Chemical Toxicology45: 618–621.
57.
ZhaiHChanHPHuiXMaibachHI (2008) Skin decontamination of glyphosate from human skin in vitro. Food and Chemical Toxicology46(6): 2258–2260.
