In management of carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere, the authors argue that it is far superior to control upstream where the carbon leaves the ground in a limited number of places than further downstream as carbon dioxide is released in a myriad of locations. The authors note that none of the proposals being discussed politically assure this, and they control sector by sector, allowing undesirable room for special interests to be excluded from control.
Alex Williams (2007) NT Times, Sunday Styles, on Sunday July 1st 2007.
2.
An Appropriate Role for Nuclear Power in meeting Global Energy Needs. (1999) The Atlantic Council of the United States. p. 44.
3.
Bluestein J (2005) Upstream Regulation of CO2 National Energy Policy Workshop. Washington, DC.
4.
Deutsch J Moniz E (2003) The Future of Nuclear Power. An Interdisciplinary MIT study.Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. p. 79.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Jorgensen D; Wilcox D; (1992).
9.
EA Joseph NS Robert (2007) Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Lackner KS Wilson R Ziock HJ (1999) Free-market approaches to controlling carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere: a discussion of the scientificbasis. In: Kusunuglu, BN, Mintz, SL, Perlmutter, A, (eds), Global Foundation Conference on Global Warming and Energy Policy. New York, Boston, Dortrecht, London and Moscow: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, pp. 31–46.
11.
12.
Robert NS (2007) Proposal for a US Cap-and Trade System to Address Global Climate Change: A Sensible and Practical Approach to Reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions. Washington: Hamilton project. Brookings Institution (in preparation).
