The psychometric properties of the General Functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device were examined using the Rasch Model (N = 237 couples). Mothers’ and fathers’ ratings of the General Functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device are recommended, provided these are analyzed separately. More than a quarter of couples differed significantly in their ratings.
AaronsG.McDonaldE.ConnellyC.NewtonR. (2007). Assessment of family functioning in Caucasian and Hispanic Americans: Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 46, 557–569.
2.
AkisterJ.Stevenson-HindeJ. (1991). Identifying families at risk: Exploring the potential of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 411–421.
3.
AllisonC.Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. J.StoneM. H.MuncerS. J. (2011). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 829–835. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.005
4.
AndrichD. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–574.
5.
AndrichD. (1982). An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR-20 index, and the Guttman scale response pattern. Education Research and Perspectives, 9, 95–104.
6.
AndrichD. (2011). Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 11, 571–585. doi:10.1586/erp.11.59
7.
AndrichD.HumphryS. M.MaraisI. (2012). Quantifying local, response dependence between two polytomous items using the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 309–324.
8.
AndrichD.SheridanB. E.LuoG. (2012). RUMM2030: Rasch Unidimensional Models for Measurement. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory.
9.
AndrichD.WrightB. D. (1994). Rasch sensitivity and Thurstone insensitivity to graded responses. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 382.
10.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
BylesJ.ByrneC.BoyleM. H.OffordD. R. (1988). Ontario Child Health Study: Reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 27, 97–104.
12.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2006). Examining the validity of self-report assessments of family functioning: A question of the level of analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 209–216. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.209
13.
CoxM. J.PaleyB. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.243
14.
da RochaN. S.ChachamovichE.de Almeida FleckM. P.TennantA. (2013). An introduction to Rasch analysis for psychiatric practice and research. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47, 141–148. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.014
15.
EpsteinN. B.BaldwinL.BishopD. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.
16.
FisherW. P. (2010). Reliability, precision, and measurement in the context of data from ability tests, surveys, and assessments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 238, 1–6.
17.
GeorgiadesK.BoyleM. H.JenkinsJ. M.SanfordM.LipmanE. (2008). A multilevel analysis of whole family functioning using the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 344–354.
18.
GreenR. G.VoslerN. R. (1992). Issues in the assessment of family practice. Journal of Social Service Research, 15(3–4), 1–19. doi:10.1300/J079v15n03_01
19.
HagquistC.BruceM.GustavssonJ. P. (2009). Using the Rasch model in nursing research: An introduction and illustrative example. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 380–393.
20.
HaydenL. C.SchillerM.DicksteinS.SeiferR.SameroffS.MillerI.. . .RasmussenS. (1998). Levels of family assessment: I. Family, marital, and parent–child interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 7–22.
21.
KabacoffR. I.MillerI. W.BishopD. S.EpsteinN. B.KeitnerG. I. (1990). A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples. Journal of Family Psychology, 3, 431–439.
22.
MaraisI.AndrichD. (2008). Formalizing dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 200–215.
23.
MillerI. W.KabacoffR. I.EpsteinN. B.BishopD. S.KeitnerG. I.BaldwinL. M.van der SpuyH. I. J. (1994). The development of a clinical rating scale the McMaster model of family functioning. Family Process, 33, 53–69. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00053.x
24.
MillerI. W.RyanC. E.KeitnerG. I.BishopD. S.EpsteinN. B. (2000a). “Factor analyses of the Family Assessment Device,” by Ridenour, Daley, & Reich. Family Process, 39, 141–144. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2000.39112.x
25.
MillerI. W.RyanC. E.KeitnerG. I.BishopD. S.EpsteinN. B. (2000b). The McMaster approach to families: Theory, assessment, treatment and research. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 168–189. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00145
26.
MillerI. W.RyanC. E.KeitnerG. I.BishopD. S.EpsteinN. B. (2000c). Why fix what isn’t broken? A rejoinder to Ridenour, Daley, & Reich. Family Process, 39, 381–384.
27.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H.BergeJ. M. t. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
RaschG. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
RaschG. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19(1), 49–57.
31.
RidenourT. A.DaleyJ.ReichW. (1999). Factor analyses of the Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 38, 497–510.
32.
RidenourT. A.DaleyJ.ReichW. (2000). Further evidence that the family assessment device should be reorganized: Response to Miller and colleagues. Family Process, 39, 375–380.
33.
SawyerM. G.SarrisA.BaghurstP. A.CrossD. G.KalucyR. S. (1988). Family Assessment Device: Reports from mothers, fathers, and adolescents in community and clinic families. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 287–296. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1988.tb00748.x
34.
SmithE. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 205–231.
35.
Stevenson-HindeJ.AkisterJ. (1995). The McMaster model of family functioning: Observer and parental ratings in a nonclinical sample. Family Process, 34, 337–347. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00337.x
36.
Stevenson-HindeJ.CurleyJ. P.ChicotR.JóhannssonC. (2007). Anxiety within families: Interrelations, consistency, and change. Family Process, 46, 543–556. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00231.x
