The Screening Test for Emotional Problems – Teacher Version (STEP-T) was designed to identify students aged 7–17 years with wide-ranging emotional disturbances. Coefficients alpha and test-retest reliability were adequate for all subscales except Anxiety. The hypothesized five-factor model fit the data very well and external aspects of validity were excellent.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for the Achenbach System for Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
2.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory- Second Edition (BDI-II). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
3.
ConnersC. K. (2008). Manual for the Conners 3. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
4.
CullinanD.SabornieE. (2004). Characteristics of emotional disturbances in middle and high school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 157–167. doi:10.1177/10634266040120030301
5.
DimitrovM. D. (2012). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
6.
ErfordB. T. (2013). Assessment for counselors (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Wadsworth.
7.
ErfordB. T.AlsamadiS. C. (2012). The Screening Test for Emotional Problems–Parent Report (STEP-P): Studies of reliability and validity. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 45, 170-180. doi: 10.1177/0748175611432643
8.
ErfordB. T.BalcomL.Moore-ThomasC. (2007). The Screening Test for Emotional Problems (STEP): Studies of reliability and validity. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 39, 209-225.
9.
ErfordB. T.ClarkK. (2011). Technical analysis of the Disruptive Behavior Rating Scale – Second Edition – Teacher Version. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 3-15. doi: 10.1177/0748175610391605
10.
ErfordB. T.ShortS.FreemanA. (2012). The Screening Test for Emotional Problems – Self-Report (STEP-S): Studies of reliability and validity. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37, 251-256. doi: 10.1177/1534508411413759
11.
GloverT. A.AlbersC. A. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 117–135. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005
12.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
13.
MuthenL. K.MuthenB. O. (2007). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
14.
NelsonR.EpsteinM.GriffithA.HopperJ. (2007). Factor structure, internal consistency, and interrater reliability of the early childhood behavior problem screening scale. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 148–154. doi:10.1177/02711214070270030501
15.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2006). Manual for the Behavior Assessment System for Children–Second Edition (BASC-2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
16.
ReynoldsC. R.RichmondB. O. (2008). Manual for the Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale–2nd Edition (RCMAS-2). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
17.
ReynoldsW. M. (2002). Manual for the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale–Second Edition (RADS-2). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18.
RudyH. L.LevinsonE. M. (2008). Best practices in the multidisciplinary assessment of emotional disturbances: A primer for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86, 494–504. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00537.x
19.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). The Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (P.L. 108-446). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20.
WalkerH. M. (1983). The Walker Problem Behavior Identification Checklist (WPBIC) (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
