This article describes the confirmatory factor analysis of the Student Engagement in School Success Skills (SESSS) instrument. The results of this study confirm that the SESSS has potential to be a useful self-report measure of elementary students’ use of strategies and skills associated with enhanced academic learning and achievement.
American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
BrownD.TrustyJ. (2005). School counselors, comprehensive school counseling programs, and academic achievement: Are school counselors promising more than they can deliver?Professional School Counseling, 9, 1–8.
3.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
4.
CareyJ. C.BrigmanG.WebbL.VillaresE.HarringtonK. (2014). Development of an instrument to measure student use of academic success skills: An exploratory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47, 171–180. doi:10.1177/0748175613505622
5.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.
6.
DimmittC.CareyJ. C.HatchT. (2007). Evidence-based school counseling. Making a difference with data-driven practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
DimmittC.CareyJ. C.McGannonW.HenningsonI. (2005). Identifying a school counseling research agenda: A Delphi study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 214–228.
8.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
9.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
10.
GreenbergM. T.WeissbergR. P.O’BrienM. U.ZinsJ. E.FredericksL.ResnikH. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.
11.
HattieJ.BiggsJ.PurdieN. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–130.
12.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
13.
JoreskogK. G.SorbomD. (2006a). LISREL for Windows (Version 8.8) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
MarzanoR.PickeringD.PollockJ. (2001). Classroom instruction that works. Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
MastenA. S.CoatsworthJ. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.
18.
MetaMetricsInc. (2012). The Lexile Framework for Reading. Retrieved from www.lexile.com
19.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
SperlingR. A.HowardB. C.MillerL. A.MurphyC. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79.
21.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
WangM. C.HaertelG. D.WalbergH. J. (1994). What helps students learn?Educational Leadership, 51, 74–79.
24.
WestS. G.FinchJ. F.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
WhistonS. C.QuinbyR. F. (2009). Review of school counseling outcome research. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 267–272.
26.
WhistonS. C.SextonT. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 412–426.
27.
WhistonS. C.TaiW. L.RahardjaD.EderK. (2011). School counseling outcome: A meta-analytic examination of interventions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89, 37–55.
28.
YildizE.AkpınarE.TatarN.ErginO. (2009). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the Metacognition Scale for Primary School Students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9, 1591–1604.
29.
ZinsJ.WeissbergR.WangM.WalbergH. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What the research says. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
