The purpose of this study was to validate the English version of the original German Dyadic Coping Inventory. Results indicated that the English version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory is a valid and reliable measure of dyadic coping in a sample of 709 heterosexual university students.
BarbarinO. A.HughesD.CheslerM. A. (1985). Stress, coping, and marital functioning among parents of children with cancer. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 473–480.
2.
BodenmannG. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren [Stress and coping in couples]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
3.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT. A.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11031-002
BodenmannG.CinaA. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89. doi:10.1300/J087v44n01_04
6.
BodenmannG.MeuwlyN.BradburyT. N.GmelchS.LedermannT. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 408–424. doi:10.1177/0265407510361616
7.
BodenmannG.PihetS.KayserK. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485
8.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CoyneJ. C.SmithD. A. F. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 404–412.
10.
DeVellisR. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
13.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
14.
KardatzkeK. N. (2009). Perceived stress, adult attachment, dyadic coping and marital satisfaction of counseling graduate students. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(8-A), 2902.
15.
LedermannT.BodenmannG.GagliardiS.CharvozL.VerardiS.RossierJ.. . . IafrateR. (2010). Psychometrics of the Dyadic Coping Inventory in three language groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 201–212. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000024
16.
PappL. M.WittN. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 551–559. doi:10.1037/a0020836
17.
PearlinL. I.SchoolerC. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21.
18.
RevensonT. A.KayserK.BodenmannG. (2005). Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
SabourinS.ValoisP.LussierY. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17, 15–27. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15
20.
SchwarzerR.SchwarzerC. (1996). A critical survey of coping instruments. In ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 107–132). New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
22.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
WheatonB.MuthenB.AlwinD.SummersG. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In HeiseD. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
WidmerK.CinaA.CharvozL.ShantinathS.BodenmannG. (2005). A model dyadic-coping intervention. In RevensonT. A.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 159–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
WundererE.SchneewindK. A. (2008). The relationship between marital standards, dyadic coping and marital satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 462–476. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.405
