Using Baccalaureate and Beyond 2001 data, we found that STEM major was associated with an SAT pattern less common among females than males, in which the student’s quantitative score exceeded the verbal score. Verbal ability was negatively associated with STEM major. Implications for career theory and test interpretation are discussed.
ABET. (2011). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Author.
2.
American Institutes for Research. (n.d.). The AM Software, Beta Version 0.60.00 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://am.air.org/
3.
AyotolaA.AdedejiT. (2009). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 1, 953–957.
4.
BanduraA. (1994). Self-efficacy. In RamachandranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
ColeD.EspinozaA. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science, technology, and engineering (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 285–300.
6.
DavisonM. L.DavenportE. C.Jr. (2002). Identifying criterion-related patterns of predictor scores using multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 7, 468–484.
7.
DoransN. T.LivingstonS. A. (1987). Male-female differences in SAT-verbal ability among students of high SAT-mathematical ability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 65–71.
8.
HackettG. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47–56.
9.
HackettG.BetzN. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326–339.
10.
LapanR. T.ShaughnessyP. (1996). Efficacy expectations and vocational interests as mediators between sex and choice of math/science college majors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 277–291.
11.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.LarkinK. C. (1987). Comparison of three theoretically derived variables in predicting career behavior: Self-efficacy, interest congruence, and consequence thinking. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 293–298.
12.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.SheuH.-B.SchmidtJ.BrennerB. R.GlosterC. S.. . . TreistmanD. (2005). Social-cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students of historically black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 84–92.
13.
LentR. W.LopezF. G.BieschkeK. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choices. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430.
14.
LentR. W.LopezA. M.Jr.LopezF. G.SheuH. G. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing sciences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 52–62.
15.
NautaM. M.EppersonD. L. (2003). A longitudinal examination of the social-cognitive model applied to high school girls’ choices of non-traditional college majors and aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 448–457.
16.
PajaresF.MillerD. M. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performance: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198.
17.
ParkG.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952.
18.
Riegle-CrumbC.KingB. (2011). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39, 656–664.
19.
RiemerM. J. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st century engineer. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 11, 89–100.
20.
TurnerS. E.BowenW. G. (1999). Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2, 289–313.
21.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study: 2000–01 (B&B:2000/01; Methodology Report, NCES 2003-156). Washington, DC: Author.
22.
WareN. C.StecklerN. A.LesermanJ. L. (1985). Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major?Journal of Higher Education, 56, 73–84.
