This study assessed the score reliability of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire–Revised (DMQ-R) via generalizability theory. Participants (n = 367 college students) completed the DMQ-R at three time points. Across subscale scores, persons, persons × occasions, and persons × items interactions accounted for meaningful variance. Findings illustrate advantages of generalizability theory–based techniques.
BrennanR. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
2.
ChristT. J.Riley-TillmanT. C.ChafouleasS. M.BoiceC. H. (2010). Direct behavior rating (DBR): Generalizability and dependability across raters and observations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 825–843. doi:10.1177/001316441036669510.1177/0013164410366695
3.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.28410.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
4.
CiminiM. D.MartensM. P.LarimerM. E.KilmerJ. R.NeighborsC.MonserratJ. M. (2009). Assessing the effectiveness of peer-facilitated interventions addressing high-risk drinking among judicially mandated college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 57–66.
5.
CooperM. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6, 117–128. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.11710.1037/1040-3590.6.2.117
6.
CooperM. L.FroneM. R.RussellM.MudarP. (1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 990–1005. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.99010.1037/0022-3514.69.5.990
7.
CooperM. L.KrullJ. L.AgochaV. B.FlanaganM. E.OrcuttH. K.GrabeS.. . . MaudetteJ. (2008). Motivational pathways to alcohol use and abuse among Black and White adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 485-501. doi:10.1037/a0012592
8.
CooperM. L.RussellM.SkinnerJ. B.WindleM. (1992). Development and validation of a three-dimensional measure of drinking motives. Psychological Assessment, 4, 123–132. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.2.12310.1037/1040-3590.4.2.123
9.
CoxW. M.KlingerE. (1988). A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 168–180. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.97.2.16810.1037/0021-843X.97.2.168
10.
GrantV. V.StewartS. H.O’ConnorR. M.BlackwellE.ConrodP. J. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of the Five-Factor Modified Drinking Motives Questionnaire–Revised in undergraduates. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2611–2632. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.07.00410.1016/j.addbeh.2007.07.004
11.
HelmsJ. E.HenzeK. T.SassT. L.MifsudV. A. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 630–660. doi:10.1177/001100000628830810.1177/0011000006288308
12.
HingsonR. W.ZhaW.WeitzmanE. R. (2009). Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24, 1998–2005. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Supplement, 16, 12–20.
13.
HoytW. T.MelbyJ. N. (1999). Dependability of measurement in counseling psychology: An introduction to generalizability theory. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 325–352. doi:10.1177/001100009927300310.1177/0011000099273003
14.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2008). Monitoring the Future National Survey results on drug use, 1975–2007: Vol. I, Secondary school students. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
15.
KuntscheE.KnibbeR.GmelG.EngelsR. (2005). Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 841–861. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.06.00210.1016/j.cpr.2005.06.002
16.
KuntscheE.KnibbeR.GmelG.EngelsR. (2006). Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1844–1857. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.02810.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.028
17.
MacLeanM. G.LecciL. (2000). A comparison of models of drinking motives in a university sample. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 83–87. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.14.1.8310.1037/0893-164X.14.1.83
18.
MartensM. P.CoxR. H.BeckN. C.HeppnerP. (2003). Measuring motivations for intercollegiate athlete alcohol use: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Drinking Motives Measure. Psychological Assessment, 15, 235–239. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.23510.1037/1040-3590.15.2.235
19.
MartensM. P.RochaT. L.MartinJ. L.SerraoH. F. (2008). Drinking motives and college students: Further examination of a four-factor model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 289–295. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.28910.1037/0022-0167.55.2.289
20.
MushquashC.O’ConnorB. P. (2006). SPSS and SAS programs for generalizability theory analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 542–547. doi:10.3758/BF0319281010.3758/BF03192810
21.
NewcombM. D.ChouC.BentlerP. M.HubaG. J. (1988). Cognitive motivations for drug use among adolescents: Longitudinal tests of gender differences and predictors of change in drug use. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 426–438. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.35.4.42610.1037/0022-0167.35.4.426
22.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.42010.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
23.
SimonsJ. S.CorreiaC. J.CareyK. B.BorsariB. E. (1998). Validating a five-factor marijuana motives measure: Relations with use, problems, and alcohol motives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 265–273. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.26510.1037/0022-0167.45.3.265
24.
StewartS. H.ZeitlinS. B.SamolukS. B. (1996). Examination of a three-dimensional drinking motives questionnaire in a young adult university student sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 61–71. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00036-W10.1016/0005-7967(95)00036-W
VolpeR. J.BrieschA. M.GadowK. D. (2011). The efficiency of behavior rating scales to assess inattentive-overactive and oppositional-defiant behaviors: Applying generalizability theory to streamline assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 131–155. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.00510.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.005
27.
WebbN. M.ShavelsonR. J.HaertelE. H. (2007). Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. In RaoC. R.SinharayS. (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Vol. 26. Psychometrics (pp. 81–124). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
28.
WechslerH.LeeJ. E.KuoM.SeibringM.NelsonT. F.LeeH. (2002). Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Journal of American College Health, 50, 203–217.
29.
WintersteinB. P.WillseJ. T.KwapilT. R.SilviaP. J. (2010). Assessment of score dependability of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales using generalizability analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 575–585. doi:10.1007/s10862-010-9181-x10.1007/s10862-010-9181-x
