BauerRaymond A., and GreyserStephen A. (1967), “The Dialogue that Never Happens,”Harvard Business Review, 45(November/December), 2–8.
2.
CassidyJohn (1998), “The Force of an Idea,”The New Yorker, 73(42), 32–37.
3.
Central Hudson v. Public Service Commission (1980), 447 U.S. 557, 563.
4.
GomesLee (1998), “QWERTY Spells a Saga of Market Economics,”The Wall Street Journal, (February 25), B1, B6.
5.
KirmaniAmna (1997), “Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong,”Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 77–86.
6.
MannCharles C., and PlummerMark L. (1988), “The Big Headache,”The Atlantic, 262(October), 39–57.
7.
MarquezF.T. (1977), “Advertising Content: Persuasion, Information or Intimidation?”Journalism Quarterly, 54(Autumn), 482–91.
NelsonPhillip (1974), “Advertising as Information,”Journal of Political Economy, 82(July-August), 729–54.
10.
PitofskyRobert (1977), “Beyond Nader: Consumer Protection and the Regulation of Advertising,”Harvard Law Review, 90(February), 661–701.
11.
PrestonIvan L. (1998), “Puffery and Other ‘Loophole’ Claims: How the Law's ‘Don't Ask, Don't Tell’ Policy Condones Fraudulent Falsity in Advertising,”Journal of Law and Commerce, 18(1), forthcoming.
12.
ResnikAlan, and SternBruce L. (1977), “An Analysis of Information Content in Television Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 41(January), 50–53.
13.
SchleicherTara (1997), “The U.S. Supreme Court's Use of Post-Chicago Antitrust Theory in Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services: Implications for Marketing Practice,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(Fall), 310–18.
14.
Tropicana advertisement (1998), The New Yorker, 73(April 13), 23.