Abstract
Consistent with a specific objective of the National Gambling Impact and Policy Commission Act (Public Law 104–169, 100 Stat., Section 4), this article examines some background, psychological, comorbidity, and personality characteristics and beliefs associated with pathological gambling. The authors develop hypotheses pertaining to differences between probable pathological gamblers and the general population. These hypotheses are tested using two samples: (1) a sample of gamblers, composed of members of Gamblers Anonymous and persons clinically diagnosed and in treatment for pathological gambling (n = 44) and (2) a random sample from the three-state area in which the study was conducted. The results show marked differences between these groups. The authors address implications for consumer welfare and public policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
