After discussing the value of trademarks to consumers and businesses, the authors outline the major objectives of trademark law. The authors review recent federal trademark infringement cases that involve the use of disclaimers, in terms of the extent to which disclaimers reduce the likelihood of consumer confusion. The authors then note recent trends and provide suggestions for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A&H Sportswear Co. v. Victoria's Secret Stores (1996), 926 F. Supp. 1233 (E.D. Perm.).
2.
AakerDavid A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name.New York: The Free Press.
3.
AndrewsJ. Craig, and MaronickThomas J. (1995), “Advertising Research Issues from FTC Versus Stouffer Foods Corporation,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 14(2), 301–09.
4.
Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Balducci Publications (1994), 28 F. 3d 769, 31 USPQ 2D, 1296 (8th Cir.).
5.
ArmstrongLarry, and CorteseAmy E. (1997), “The Internet: Ticketmaster vs. Microsoft,”BusinessWeek, (May 12), 48.
6.
AssmusGert, and WieseCarsten (1995), “How to Address the Gray Market Threat Using Price Coordination,”Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 31–42.
BiermanMichael H., and WexlerJeffrey D. (1990), “Toward a Reformulation of the Test for Determining Trademark Infringement,”The Trademark Reporter, 80(1), 1–35.
9.
BurrosMarian (1997), “Eating Well: A Dietary Supplement that has Scientists Concerned About Possible Side Effects,”New York Times, (April 23), C7.
10.
CaffeyAndrew A. (1993), “Licensing of Products Poses New Challenges,”The National Law Journal, (May 17), S11–14.
11.
Charles of the Ritz Group Ltd v. Quality King Distributors Inc. (1987), 832 F. 2d 1317, 4 USPQ 2D 1778 (CA).
12.
CoburnKaren Ann (1997), “Fountain of Youth—Or High-Risk Hokum?”BusinessWeek, (June 9), 121.
13.
CohenDorothy (1991), “Trademark Strategy Revisited,”Journal of Marketing, 55(July), 46–59.
14.
ColemanAndrew W. (1997), “National Brands, Private Labels and Unfair Competition—When Imitation Goes Beyond the Sincerest Form of Flattery,”The Trademark Reporter, 87(1), 79–111.
15.
CollinsAllan M., and LoftusElizabeth F. (1975), “A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,”Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–28.
16.
Conopco Inc. v. May Department Stores Co. (1994), 46 F. 3d 1556, 32 USPQ 2D 1225.
17.
CoxEli P.III, WogalterMichael S., StokesSara L., and Tipton MurffElizabeth J. (1997), “Do Product Warnings Increase Safe Behavior? A Meta-Analysis,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(2), 195–204.
18.
DorrRobert C., and MunchChristopher H. (1990), Protecting Trade Secrets, Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
EngelJames F., BlackwellRoger D., and MiniardPaul (1982), Consumer Behavior, 4th ed.Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.
FiskeSusan T., and TaylorShelley E. (1991), Social Cognition.New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
FoxmanE.R., BergerP.W., and CoteJoseph A. (1992), “Consumer Brand Confusion: A Conceptual Framework,”Psychology and Marketing, 9(March/April), 123–41.
23.
Graham Webb Int'l. L.P. v. Emporium Drug Mart (1995), 916 F. Supp 909 (E.D. Ark., W. Div.).
24.
HandlerArthur, and McCarthyEileen P. (1996), “Conopco—Consumer Confusion Remains the Touchstone of Trade Dress Infringement,”The Trademark Reporter, 86(5), 595–610.
25.
HartmanSteve (1997), “Brand Equity Impairment—The Meaning of Dilution,”The Trademark Reporter, 87(4), 418–35.
26.
HeinClinton (1997), “Confused About Federal Trademark Dilution?”The Trademark Reporter, 87(4), 370–417.
27.
HellerWilliam, and RothStephen F. (1996), “Policing Against Information Highway Robbery,”New Jersey Law Journal, (July 15), S-2.
28.
Home Box Office Inc. v. Showtime/The Movie Channel Inc. (1989), 832 F. 2d 1311, 4 USPQ 2D 1789, 1793 (CA 2), revg in part Home Box Office Inc. v. Showtime/The Movie Channel Inc. (1987) 665 F. Supp 1079, 3 USPQ 2D 1806 (SDNY).
29.
HuntShelby, and MorganRobert M. (1995), “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition,”Journal of Marketing, 59(April), 1–15.
30.
JacobyJacob (1985), “Survey and Field Experimental Evidence,” in The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure, KassinSaul M., and WrightsmanLawrence S., eds. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications,175–200.
31.
JacobyJacob, HandlinAmy H., and SimonsonAlex (1994), “Survey Evidence in Deceptive Advertising Cases Under the Lanham Act,”The Trademark Reporter, 84(5), 541–85.
32.
JacobyJacob, and RaskopfRobert Lloyd (1986), “Disclaimers in Trademark Infringement Litigation: More Trouble Than They Are Worth?”The Trademark Reporter, 76(1), 35–58.
33.
JacobyJacob, and SzybilloGeorge J. (1994), “Why Disclaimers Fail,”The Trademark Reporter, 84(2), 224–44.
34.
JacobyJacob, SzybilloGeorge J., and Busato-SchachJ. (1977), “Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4), 209–16.
35.
KapfererJean-Noel (1995), “Brand Confusion: Empirical Study of a Legal Concept,”Psychology and Marketing, 12(6), 551–68.
36.
KellerKevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.
37.
KentFelix H. (1997), “Requirement of Product Labeling,”New York Law Journal, (February 21), 3.
38.
KirkpatrickRichard L. (1996), Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law.New York: Practising Law Institute.
39.
LightLarry (1993), Building Brand Relationships: The Trustmarketer's Road to Enduring Profitable Growth.New York: American Association of Advertising Agencies, Coalition for Brand Equity.
40.
MaronickThomas J. (1991), “Copy Tests in the FTC Deception Cases: Guidelines for Researchers,”Journal of Advertising Research, 31(December), 9–17.
41.
McDonald's Corp. v. Druck & Gerner, DDS., P.C. (1993), 814 F. Supp 1127, 26 USPQ 2D, 1493 (N.D. New York).
42.
McDonald's Corp. v. John L. McClain (1995), TTAB 37 USPQ 2D, 1274.
43.
McDonald's Corp. v. McBagels Inc. (1986), 649 F. Supp. 1268, 1272 (S.D.N.Y.).
44.
MillerArthur R., and DavisMichael H. (1983), Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, and Copyright in a Nutshell.St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
45.
MorganFred W. (1990), “Judicial Standards for Survey Research: An Update and Guidelines,”Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 59–70.
46.
MostertFrederick W. (1996), “Well-Known and Famous Marks: Is Harmony Possible in the Global Village?”The Trademark Reporter, 86(2), 103–41.
47.
MTV Networks v. Curry (1994), 867 F. Supp. 202 (S.D.N.Y.).
48.
National Football League Properties Inc. v. Wichita Falls Sportswear Inc. (1982), 532 F. Supp 651, 215 USPQ 175 (W.D. Wash.).
49.
Novo Nordisk of North America Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co. (1996), 96 Civ 5787 (BSJ), LEXIS 12807 (S.D.N.Y.).
50.
Parker-PopeTara (1997), “Danger: Warning Labels May Backfire,”The Wall Street Journal, (April 28), B8.
51.
Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I Ltd. (1996), 942 F. Supp 1513 (S.D. Texas).
52.
Playboy Enterprises Inc. v. Chuckleberry Publishing Inc. (1980), 486 F. Supp 414, 206 USPQ 70 (S.D.N.Y.).
53.
Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Elects. Corp. (1961), 287 F. 2d 492, 495 (2nd Cir), cert. denied, 368 US 820, 82 S. Ct. 36, 7 L. Ed. 2d 25.
54.
Quality Inns Int'l. Inc. v. McDonald's Corp. (1988), 695 F. Supp 198 (D. Md.).
RichardsJef I. (1997), “Legal Potholes on the Information Superhighway,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(2), 319–26.
57.
R.J. Corr Naturals Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co. (1997), No. 97 C 1059, LEXIS 6020 (N.D. Ill., E. Div.).
58.
RappeportMichael (1995), ‘The Role of the Survey ‘Expert'—A Response to Judge Posner,”The Trademark Reporter, 85(2), 211–20.
59.
Ross Cosmetics Distribution Ctrs. v. United States (1994), 18 CIT 979, Ct. Intl. Trade 189, SLIP OP 94–161, 34 USPQ 2D, 1758.
60.
SamuelsLinda B., and SamuelsJeffrey M. (1996), “Color Trademarks: Protection Under U.S. Law,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15(2), 303–307.
61.
Schering Corp. v. Schering AG and Berlex Laboratories Inc. (1987), 667 F. Supp 175, 4 USPQ 2d 1596 (D.N.J.).
62.
Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca (1994), 850 F. Supp 232, US Dist 3785, 31 USPQ 2D, 1865 (S.D.N.Y.).
63.
SchneidmanDiane (1987), “Use of ‘Mc’ in Front of Travel Firms’ Names Leads to Lawsuits,”Marketing News, 21(November 20), 17.
64.
Simon & Schuster Inc. v. Dove Audio Inc. (1997), 970 F. Supp 279 (S.D.N.Y.).
65.
SimonsonAlexander F. (1993), “How and When Do Trademarks Dilute: A Behavioral Framework to Judge ‘Likelihood’ of Dilution,”The Trademark Reporter, 83(2), 149–74.
66.
SimonsonItamar (1993), “The Effect of Survey Method on Likelihood of Confusion Estimates: Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Test,”The Trademark Reporter, 83(3), 364–71.
67.
SimonsonItamar (1994), “Trademark Infringement from the Buyer Perspective: Conceptual Analysis and Measured Implications,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(2), 181–99.
68.
SpringerKaren, and MillerAnnetta (1990), “Sequels for the Shelf,”Newsweek, (July 9), 42–43.
69.
Sterling Drug Inc. v. Bayer AG (1994), 14 F. 3d 733, 29 USPQ 2D, 1321 (2nd Cir.).
70.
SudmanSeymour (1995), “When Experts Disagree: Comments on the Articles by Jacoby and Szybillo and Stewart,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 14(1), 29–34.
71.
SwannJerre B., and DavisTheodore H.Jr. (1994), “Dilution, An Idea Whose Time Has Gone; Brand Equity as Protectible Property, The New/Old Paradigm,”The Trademark Reporter, 84 (3), 267–99.
72.
Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. (1997), 964 F. Supp 733, 43 USPQ 2D, 1083 (S.D.N.Y.).
73.
UglowStewart (1994), “Address for Success,”The Washington Post, (August 11), A1.
74.
UnikelRobert (1995), “Better by Design: The Availability of Trade Dress Protection for Product Design and the Demise of ‘Aesthetic Functionality,”’The Trademark Reporter, 85(3), 312–43.
75.
Upjohn Co. v. American Home Products Corp. (1996), File No. 1:95:CV:237, LEXIS 8049 (W.D. Mich.).
76.
WelterPhyllis J. (1995), “A Call to Improve Trademark Survey Evidence,”The Trademark Reporter, 85(2), 205–10.
77.
WilkieWilliam L. (1987), “Affirmative Disclosure at the FTC: Communication Decisions,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 6, 33–42.
78.
ZaichkowskyJudith (1995), Defending Your Brand Against Imitation.Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
