Interest in the role of video supers—superimposed video presentations of verbal information—has grown among consumers, advertisers, the television networks, and public policymakers, as supers have become prevalent in television commercials. The authors empirically address the communication efficacy of video supers in a sample of 200 different commercials that contain video supers. Drawing on a theory of modality effects, the authors examine the comprehension of video supers relative to commercial content. The authors develop hypotheses and analyze structural determinants of video super comprehension, such as presence of a voice-over, rate of presentation, and presentation size. The findings are supportive of the predictions and suggest that viewer opportunity to process information in a video super might be a critical element in any strategy to increase viewer comprehension rates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerDavid A., and DayGeorge S. (1982), “Preface to Fourth Edition,” in Consumerism: Search for the Consumer Interest, 4th ed,AakerDavid A., and DayGeorge S., eds. New York: The Free Press, vii–viii.
2.
ABC Advertising Standards and Guidelines (1992), Department of Broadcasting Standards and Practices, Visual Supers 1.
3.
Advertising Age (1995), (December 11).
4.
AlpertMark L., GoldenLinda L., and HoyerWayne D. (1983), “The Impact of Repetition on Advertisement Miscomprehension and Effectiveness,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, BagozziRichard P., and TyboutAlice M., eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research,130–35.
5.
AppelbaumMark I., and CramerEliot M. (1974), “Some Problems in the Nonorthogonal Analysis of Variance,”Psychological Bulletin, 81, 335–43.
6.
BaddeleyA.D. (1983), “Working Memory,”Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, B203, 311–24.
7.
BaddeleyA.D. (1986), Working Memory.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BarlowTodd, and WogalterMichael S. (1993), “Alcoholic Beverage Warnings in Magazine and Television Advertisements,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20(June), 147–56.
9.
BettmanJames R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
CBS Television Network Advertising Guidelines (1988), CTN35.
11.
ChildersTerry L., and HoustonMichael J. (1984), “Conditions for a Picture Superiority Effect on Consumer Memory,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11(September), 643–54.
12.
Cliffdale (1984), 103 FTC supra note 40, at 165.
13.
ConoverW. J. (1971), Practical Non-Parametric Statistics.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
Federal Trade Commission Staff Report (1979), Consumer Information Remedies.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
FordGary T., and YalchRichard (1982), “Viewer Miscomprehension of Televised Communication: A Comment,”Journal of Marketing, (Fall), 27–31.
16.
FrankeGeorge R., and LeeRenee G. (1994), “The Use of Supers in TV Commercials: A Content and Correspondence Analysis,” working paper, Department of Management and Marketing, University of Alabama.
17.
FrickR.W. (1984), “Using Both an Auditory and a Visual Short-Term Store to Increase Digit Span,”Memory and Cognition, 12, 507–14.
18.
HoyMariea G., and StankeyMichael J. (1993), “Structural Characteristics of Televised Advertising Disclosures: A Comparison with the FTC Clear and Conspicuous Standard,”Journal of Advertising, 22(June), 47–58.
19.
International Harvester Co. (1984), 104 FTC 949, 1056.
20.
JacobyJacob, and HoyerWayne D. (1982), “Viewer Miscomprehension of Televised Communication: Selected Findings,”Journal of Marketing, 46(Fall), 12–26.
21.
JacobyJacob, and HoyerWayne D. (1989), “The Comprehension/Miscomprehension of Print Communication: Selected Findings,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(March), 434–43.
22.
JacobyJacob, HoyerWayne D., and ShelugaDavid A. (1980), Miscomprehension of Televised Communications.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
KennedyJohn F. (1962), “Consumers’ Protection and Interest Program,”U.S. Congressional Code and Administrative News, 4139–47.
24.
KingT.F. (1990), “In More TV Ads, the Fine Print Gets an Evil Eye,”The Wall Street Journal, (July 12), B1.
25.
KnollN.E. (1975), “Visual Short-Term Memory,” in Short-Term Memory, DeutschD., and DeutschS., eds. New York: Academic Press,153–79.
26.
KolbeRichard H., and MuehlingDarrel D. (1992), “A Content Analysis of the ‘Fine Print’ in Television Advertising,”Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 2 (Fall), 47–61.
27.
KolerP.A., and RoedigerH.L. (1984), “Procedures of the Mind,”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–49.
28.
LenoJay (1992), Tonight Show, (October 15), NBC.
29.
ManraiLalita, ManraiAjay K., and MurrayNoel M. (1994), “Comprehension of Info-Aid Supers in Television for Social Ideas: Implications for Public Policy,”Journal of Business Research, 30(May), 75–84.
30.
MiyaoMasaru, HacisalihzadeSelim S., AllenJohn S., and StarkLawrence W. (1989), “Effects of VDT Resolution on Visual Fatigue and Readability: An Eye Movement Approach,”Ergonomics, 32(June), 603–14.
31.
MorrisLouis A., MazisMichael B., and BrinbergDavid (1989), “Risk Disclosures in Televised Prescription Drug Advertising to Consumers,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 8, 64–80.
32.
MullerThomas E. (1985), “Structural Information Factors Which Stimulate the Use of Nutrition Information: A Field Experiment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22(May), 143–57.
33.
MurphyJohn H., and RichardsJef I. (1992), “Investigation of the Effects of Disclosure Statements in Rental Car Advertisements,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 26(2), 351–76.
34.
MurrayNoel M., ManraiLalita A., and ManraiAjay K. (1993), “Public Policy Relating to Consumer Comprehension of Television Commercials: A Review and Some Empirical Results,”Journal of Consumer Policy, 16(2), 145–70.
35.
NBC (1992), Broadcast Standards and Practice, 17–18.
36.
PaivioAllen (1983), “The Empirical Case for Dual Coding,” in Imagery, Memory, and Cognition: Essays in Honor of Allan Pavio, YuilleJ., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,307–32.
37.
PennyCatherine G. (1980), “Order of Report in Bisensory Verbal Short-Term Memory,”Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 190–95.
38.
PennyCatherine G. (1989), “Modality Effects and the Structure of Short-Term Verbal Memory,”Memory and Cognition, 17(4), 398–422.
39.
PopperEdward T., and MurrayKeith B. (1989), “Communication Effectiveness and Format Effects on In Ad Disclosure of Health Warnings,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 8, 109–23.
40.
PrestonIvan L. (1989), “The Federal Trade Commission's Identification of Implications as Constituting Deceptive Advertising,”Cincinnati Law Review, 57, 1243–310.
41.
RichardsJ.I. (1990), Deceptive Advertising: A Behavioral Study of a Legal Concept.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
42.
RubinAnn (1993), personal communication.New York: Ayer Advertising Agency.
43.
SternBruce L., and HarmonRobert R. (1984), “The Incidence and Characteristics of Disclaimers in Children's Television Advertising,”Journal of Advertising, 13(2), 12–16.
44.
StuttsM.A., and HunnicuttG.G. (1987), “Can Young Children Understand Disclaimers in Commercials?”Journal of Advertising, 16(1), 41–46.
45.
Thompson Medical Company (1984), 104 FTC, 789–808.
46.
ThorelliHans B. (1982), “The Future for Consumer Information Systems,” in Consumerism: Search for the Consumer Interest, 4th ed., AakerDavid A., and DayGeorge S., eds. New York: The Free Press, 115–26.
47.
ViscusiW. Kip, MagatWesley A., and HuberJoel (1986), “Information Regulation of Consumer Health Risks: An Empirical Evaluation of Hazard Warnings,”Rand Journal of Economics, 17(Autumn), 351–72.
48.
WilkieW. L. (1986), “Affirmative Disclosure at the FTC: Strategic Dimensions,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 5, 123–44.
49.
YoungStephen L., and WogalterMichael S. (1990), “Comprehension and Memory of Instruction Manual Warnings: Conspicuous Print and Pictorial Icons,”Human Factors, 32(December), 637–49.
