The author compares recent developments involving the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on the legal treatment of puffery claims in advertising. The author offers the opinion that changes now being made in the UCC will create a more appropriate approach to puffery than the longstanding unchanged position of the FTC.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Home Products (1981), 98 FTC 136, 175.
2.
American Law Institute (1965–cont.), Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts 2d.
3.
American Law Institute (1996), Uniform Commercial Code, 14th ed., §2–313.
4.
Bristol-Myers (1983), 102 FTC 21, 321.
5.
Brown v. Castles (1853), 11 Cushing (Mass.) 348.
6.
C&H Sugar (1977), 89 FTC Decisions 15.
7.
C&H Sugar (1995), reopening and modifying, unpublished order available from Public Reference Branch, FTC.
8.
CarpenterGregory S., GlazerRashi, and NakamotoKent (1991), “Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (August), 339–50.
9.
Coca-Cola (1973), 83 FTC 746, 806.
10.
Deming v. Darling (1889), 148 Mass. 504.
11.
EdelsteinJeffrey S. (1996), letter by Hall Dickler Kent Friedman & Wood law firm on behalf of Advertising Group to National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, (July 2).
12.
Federal Trade Commission (1983), “Policy Statement Regarding Advertising Substantiation,” 48 Fed. Reg. 10471; reprinted in 47 A.T.R.R. 234 (1984), and as appendix to Thompson Medical, 104 FTC 648 (1984).
13.
Federal Trade Commission (1984), “Deception Statement,” appendix to Cliffdale, 103 FTC 110; originally a letter from James C. Miller to John D. Dingell, (Oct. 14, 1983).
14.
Federal Trade Commission (1989), Clarification of Three Provisions of a 1972 Order Concerning Safety Claims For Its Tires [Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, D-8818], advisory opinion, 112 FTC 591.
15.
Firestone (1972), 81 FTC 398.
16.
HamiltonWalton H. (1931), “The Ancient Maxim Caveat Emptor,”Yale Law Journal, 40, 1133–83.
17.
HarperFowler V., and JamesFlemingJr. (1956), The Law of Torts.Boston: Little Brown.
Metagenics (1996), unpublished initial decision available from Public Reference Branch, FTC.
21.
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and American Law Institute (1997), March 21, 1997 Draft, Uniform Commercial Code, Revised Article 2 (Sales), unpublished draft, Chicago.
22.
PaddockJames F. (1995), letter from Senior V.P., Fitzgerald & Company, to Advertising Group (Jan. 31).
23.
PeelerC. Lee (1996), personal communication, telephone, (Nov. 1).
24.
PeelerC. Lee (1997), personal communication, telephone, (Jan. 24).
25.
PrestonIvan L. (1975), The Great American Blow-Up: Puffery in Advertising and Selling.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
26.
PrestonIvan L. (1987), “Extrinsic Evidence in Federal Trade Commission Deceptiveness Cases,”Columbia Business Law Review, 1987 (3), 633–94.
27.
PrestonIvan L. (1989), “The Federal Trade Commission's Identification of Implications as Constituting Deceptive Advertising,”University of Cincinnati Law Review, 57 (4), 1243–310.
28.
PrestonIvan L. (1990), “The Definition of Deceptiveness in Advertising and Other Commercial Speech,”Catholic University Law Review, 39 (Summer), 1035–79.
29.
PrestonIvan L. (1994), The Tangled Web They Weave: Truth, Falsity and Advertisers.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
30.
PrestonIvan L. (1996), The Great American Blow-Up:Puffery in Advertising and Selling, revised ed. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
31.
RotfeldHerbert J., and RotzollKim B. (1980), “Is Advertising Puffery Believed?”Journal of Advertising, 9 (3), 16–20.
32.
SnyderWallace S. (1995), letter to National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, (Feb. 13).
33.
SpeidelRichard (1996), reporter, UCC drafting committee, and professor of law, Northwestern University, personal communication, telephone, (January 15).
34.
Sterling Drug (1983), 102 FTC 345.
35.
Sun Oil (1974), 84 FTC 247.
36.
SutherlandRoss (1995), letter from Chief Creative Officer, DMB&B, to Advertising Group, (Jan. 30).
