Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Environmental legislation has created potential liability for retailing franchisees that purchase previously contaminated land. Because of the quasi-integrated nature of the franchise relationship, the franchisor also may be drawn indirectly into liability for its franchisee's cleanup costs. The franchisor has two options to reduce its chance of liability. Faced with a decision to distance itself from the site selection process or incur the added costs and potential pricing impacts of greater involvement in the process, franchisors have strong incentives to reduce franchisee support. This reduction in support has detrimental implications for both franchise policy and environmental policy. The authors report the results of an empirical study that links franchisors’ concerns about potential environmental liability to actions to distance themselves from the site selection process or, alternatively, formally to require franchisee environmental investigation of all prospective properties.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boedecker

Karl A.

, and Morgan

Fred W.

(1980), “The Channel Implications of Product Liability Developments,” Journal of Retailing, 56 (4), 59–72.

Bond

Robert E.

(1995), Bond's Franchise Guide. Oakland, CA: Source Book Publications.

Burger King Corp. v. James R. Austin, Loretta W. Austin and Austin Food Corp. (1990), U.S. Dist., S.D. of Florida, 90-0784-Civ-Hoeveler.

Chermside

Herbert B.

(1995), “Vicarious Liability of Private Franchisor,” 81 A.L.R. 3d, 764–98.

Continental Franchise Review (1995a), “IFA Files Brief in ADA Case,” 25 (1), 2.

Continental Franchise Review (1995b), “So Far, Franchisors Unscathed by Vicarious Sex Harassment Claims,” 25 (3), 3.

Continental Franchise Review (1995c), “States Reintroduce Franchise Bills, Florida Effort Loses BK Help,” 25 (5), 6.

Continental Franchise Review (1996), “Legislative Update for Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa,” 26 (11), I.

Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc. (1984), 732 F. 2d 480 (5th Cir.).

10.

Evelyn L. Young, et al. v. American Dairy Queen, Inc. (1994), U.S. Dist., N.D. of Texas, Lubbock Division, 5:93-CV-253-C.

11.

FTC Rule (1979), “Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures,” 16 C.F.R. 436.

12.

Horn

Donald L.

, and Buckberg

Joel R.

(1995), “The Slip and Fall and More: The New Vicarious Liability,” American Bar Association Forum on Franchising, Session 6, 1–35.

13.

Lafontaine

Francine

(1995), “A Critical Appraisal of Data Sources on Franchising,” in Franchising: Contemporary Issues and Research, Kaufmann

, and Dant

, eds. New York: Haworth Press, 5–25.

14.

Margo Neff, et al. v. American Dairy Queen, Inc. (1994), U.S. Dist., W. D. of Texas, San Antonio Division, SA-94-CA-280, affirmed, 94-50552 (5th Cir. 1995).

15.

Morgan

Fred W.

(1987), “Product Liability Developments and the Nonmanufacturing Franchisor or Trademark Licensor,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 6, 129–41.

16.

New York v. Shore Realty (1985), 759 F.2d 1032 (2nd Cir.).

17.

Power Motive Corp. v. Mannesmann Demag Corp. (1985), 617 F. Supp. 1048, U.S. Dist. of Colorado.

18.

Rubin

Paul H.

(1978), “The Theory of the Firm and the Structure of the Franchise Contract,” Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 223–33.

19.

Schumacher

Joseph S.

, Sniff

Kirk F.

, and Trachtenberg

Craig R.

(1990), “Managing Environmental Risk in Franchising,” Franchise Legal Digest, 1 (January/February), 19–26.

20.

Sniff

Kirk F.

, and Trachtenberg

Craig R.

(1989), “Practical Advice for Limiting Environmental Liabilities,” American Bar Association Forum on Franchising, 1–42.

21.

Trutko

James

, Trutko

John

, and Kostecka

Andrew

(1993), Franchising's Growing Role in the U.S. Economy, 1975–2000, Report to the Small Business Administration: Office of Advocacy, Contract No. SBA-6643-OA-91.

22.

University of Louisville and IFA Educational Foundation (1994), Franchising in the Economy 1991–1993. Washington, DC: International Franchise Association.

23.

U.S. House Committee on Appropriations (1996), Report 104-676 to accompany H.R. 3814, 104th Congress, 2d Sess.

24.

U.S. House of Representatives (1990), “Franchising in the Economy,” in Hearing before the Committee on Small Business, Serial No. 101–79. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

25.

U.S. v. Fleet Factors Corp. (1990), 901 F.2d 1550, (11th Cir.).

26.

U.S. v. Kayser-Roth Corp., Inc. (1990), 910 F.2d 24, (1st Cir.).

Franchisor Environmental Liability for Previously Contaminated Property

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References