*AakerDavid A., and DayGeorge S., eds. (1971), Consumerism: Search for the Consumer Interest.New York: The Free Press.
2.
BrinbergDavid, and HirschmanElizabeth C. (1986), “Multiple Orientations for the Conduct of Marketing Research: An Analysis of the Academic/Practitioner Distinction,”Journal of Marketing, 50 (October), 161–73.
3.
BrinbergDavid, and McGrathJoseph E. (1985), Validity and the Research Process.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
4.
Federal Trade Commission (1996), Anticipating the 21st Century: Consumer Protection Policy in the New High-Tech, Global Marketplace, Volume II. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
5.
GundlachGregory T., and WilkieWilliam L. (1990), “The Marketing Literature in Public Policy: 1970–1988,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyPatrick E., and WilkieWilliam L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 329–44.
6.
JonesMary Gardiner (1990), “Marketing Academics at the FTC: Reflections and Recommendations,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyPatrick E., and WilkieWilliam L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 216–20.
7.
MurphyPatrick E. (1990), “Past FTC Participation by Marketing Academics,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyPatrick E., and WilkieWilliam L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 205–15.
8.
MurphyPatrick E., and WilkieWilliam L., eds. (1990), Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
