Prior research has shown that young people are more likely to say no to a peer group's drug or alcohol consumption when they also ask why. That is, being able to explain peer substance abuse, especially in terms of normative motives, has been associated with reduced conformity. The authors show that individual differences based on prior attitudes toward illicit consumption and susceptibility to social influence are useful for segmenting young people to better target and design effective intervention strategies. Results from Studies 1 and 2 indicate that prior attitude toward marijuana consumption and reported marijuana usage affect the explanations made to account for a peer group's substance abuse. In Study 2, the association between normative explanations for peer marijuana use and intentions to smoke marijuana is shown to depend on susceptibility to social influence. The implications of these findings for future research and for public policy are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenIcek, and FishbeinMartin (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
American Health Foundation (1995), Child Health Report Card.New York: The American Health Foundation.
3.
AschSolomon (1951), “Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments,” in Readings in Social Psychology, MaccobyEleanor E., NewcombTheodore M., and HartleyEugene L., eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 174–82.
4.
BagozziRichard P., BaumgartnerHans, and YiYoujae (1992), “State Versus Action Orientation and the Theory of Reasoned Action: An Application to Coupon Usage,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18(March), 505–18.
5.
BatesonJohn E. G., and HuiMichael K. (1992), “The Ecological Validity of Photographic Slides and Videotapes in Simulating Service Settings,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19(September), 271–81.
6.
BeardenWilliam O., NetemeyerRichard G., and TeelJesse E. (1989), “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(March), 473–81.
7.
BeardenWilliam O., and RoseRandall L. (1990), “Attention to Social Comparison Information: An Individual Difference Factor Affecting Consumer Conformity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16(March), 461–71.
8.
BeardenWilliam O., and RoseRandall L., and TeelJesse E. (1994), “Correlates of Conformity in the Consumption of Illicit Drugs and Alcohol,”Journal of Business Research, 30(May), 25–32.
9.
BeiseckerAnalee E. (1991), “Interdispositional Approaches to Drug Abuse Prevention,” in Persuasive Communication and Drug Abuse Prevention, DonohewLewis, SypherHoward E., and BukoskiWilliam J., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 229–38.
10.
BitnerMary Jo (1990), “Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surrounding and Employee Responses,”Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 69–82.
11.
BotvinGilbert J. (1996), “What We Have Learned From Twenty Years of Intervention Research,” keynote address delivered at the Conference on Social Marketing, Fairfax, Virginia, (May 17).
12.
BotvinGilbert J., and TortuStephanie (1988), “Preventing Adolescent Substance Abuse Through Life Skills Training,” in Fourteen Ounces of Prevention, PriceR. H., CowenE. L., LorionR. P., and Ramos-McKayJ., eds. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 98–110.
13.
BrownB. Bradford, ClasenDonna Rae, and EicherSue Ann (1986), “Perceptions of Peer Pressure, Peer Conformity Dispositions, and Self-Reported Behavior Among Adolescents,”Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 521–30.
14.
CampbellDonald T., and FiskeDonald W. (1959), “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,”Psychological Bulletin, 56(March), 81–105.
15.
ClaytonRichard R., CattarelloAnne, Edward DayL., and WaldenKatherine P. (1991), “Persuasive Communication and Drug Abuse Prevention: An Evaluation of the DARE Program,” in Persuasive Communication and Drug Abuse Prevention, DonohewLewis, SypherHoward E., and BukoskiWilliam J., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 295–313.
16.
CohenJacob (1977), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.London: Academic Press, 109–43.
17.
FlayBrian R. (1985), “Psychosocial Approaches to Smoking Prevention: A Review of Findings,”Health Psychology, (5), 449–88.
18.
FolkesValerie S. (1984), “Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10(March), 398–409.
19.
FolkesValerie S., and KieslerTina (1991), “Social Cognition: Consumers’ Inferences About the Self and Others,” in Handbook of Consumer Behavior, RobertsonThomas S., and KassarjianHarold H., eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 281–315.
20.
FormanSusan G., and NealJames A. (1987), “School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Programs,” in School-Based Affective and Social Interventions, FormanS. G., ed. New York: The Haworth Press, 89–102.
21.
FriedmanLarry S., LichtensteinEdward, and BiglanAnthony (1985), “Smoking Onset Among Teens: An Empirical Analysis of Initial Situations,”Addictive Behaviors, 10, 1–14.
22.
GilchristLewayne D., SchinkeSteven Paul, TrimbleJoseph E., and CvetkovichGeorge T. (1987), “Skills Enhancement to Prevent Substance Abuse Among American Indian Adolescents,”International Journal of the Addictions, 22(9), 869–79.
23.
GoldbergMarvin E., and BechtelLori J. (1996), “AdSmarts: An Intervention Invoking Reactance to Combat Alcohol Usage By Youths,” presentation delivered at the Conference on Social Marketing, Fairfax, Virginia, (May 17).
24.
HalebskyMark A. (1987), “Adolescent Alcohol and Substance Abuse: Parent and Peer Effects,”Adolescence, 22(Winter), 961–67.
25.
HochStephen J. (1987), “Perceived Consensus and Predictive Accuracy: The Pros and Cons of Projection,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 221–34.
26.
KandelDenise B., KesslerRonald C., and MarguliesRebecca Z. (1978), “Antecedents of Adolescent Initiation Into Stages of Drug Use: A Developmental Analysis,”Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7(1), 13–40.
27.
LennoxRichard D., and WolfeRaymond N. (1984), “Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1349–69.
28.
LoganBarbara N. (1991), “Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention: An Overview of the Literature,”Family & Community Health, 13(4), 25–36.
29.
LynchJohn (1982), “On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9(December), 225–39.
30.
MarksGary, MillerNorman, and MaruyamaGeoffrey (1981), “Effect of Target's Physical Attractiveness on Assumptions of Similarity,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(1), 198–206.
31.
MillerFrederick D., SmithEliot R., and UlemanJames (1981), “Measurement and Interpretation of Situational and Dispositional Attributions,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 80–95.
32.
MiniardPaul W., and CohenJoel E. (1983), “Modeling Personal and Normative Influences on Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10(September), 169–80.
33.
PettyRichard E., and CacioppoJohn T. (1996), “Addressing Disturbing and Disturbed Consumer Behavior: Is It Necessary to Change the Way We Conduct Behavioral Science?”Journal of Marketing Research, 33(February), 1–8.
34.
National Parents’ Resource Institute for Drug Education (1993), PRIDE Survey of Alcohol and Other Drug Use.Atlanta, GA: National Parents’ Resource Institute for Drug Education.
35.
PryorJohn, and KrissMitchell (1977), “The Cognitive Dynamics of Salience in the Attribution Process,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 49–55.
36.
RoseRandall L., BeardenWilliam O., and TeelJesse E. (1992), “An Attributional Analysis of Resistance to Group Pressure Regarding Illicit Drug and Alcohol Consumption,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19(June), 1–13.
37.
RossLee, BierbrauerGunter, and HoffmanSusan (1976), “The Role of Attribution Processes in Conformity and Dissent,”American Psychologist, 31(February), 148–57.
38.
ShermanSteven J., PressonClark C., and ChassinLaurie (1984), “Mechanisms Underlying the False Consensus Effect: The Special Role of Threats to Self,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(March), 127–38.
39.
ShoafF. Robert, ScattoneJoan, MorrinMaureen, and MaheswaranDurairaj (1995), “Gender Differences in Adolescent Compulsive Consumption,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, KardesFrank R., and SujanMita, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 500–504.
40.
SolomonSheldon (1978), “Measuring Dispositional and Situational Attributions,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(4), 589–93.
41.
ToblerNancy S. (1986), “Meta-Analysis of 143 Adolescent Drug Prevention Programs: Quantitative Outcome Results of Program Participants Compared to a Control or Comparison Group,”Journal of Drug Issues, 16(Fall), 537–67.
