American Drugs, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1993), 1993–2 Trade Cas. (CCH) 170,382 (Ark. Ch).
3.
AreedaP. E., and HovenkampH. (1994), “Exploitative, Predatory, and Other Pricing Policies; Related Issues,” in Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, (1994 Supplement), Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 367–507.
4.
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society (1982), 457 U.S. 332.
5.
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co. (1990), 495 U.S. 328 U.S. 328.
6.
Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (1993), 113 S. Ct. 2578.
7.
Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States (1962), 370 U.S. 294.
8.
California v. Arc America Corp. (1989), 490 U.S. 93.
9.
Caller-Times Publishing Co., Inc. v. Triad Communications, Inc. (1992), 826 S.W.2d 576 (Tex.).
10.
ClarkH. (1957), “Statutory Restrictions on Selling Below Cost,”Vanderbilt Law Review, 11, 105–28.
11.
Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland (1978), 437 U.S. 117.
12.
GlazerK. L. (1994), “Predatory Pricing and Beyond: Life After Brooke Group.”Antitrust Law Journal, 62(3), 605–33.
13.
GundlachG. T. (1995), “Price Predation: Legal Limits and Antitrust Considerations,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 14(2), 278–84.