The Federal Trade Commission's power over ‘unfair’ advertising (and other marketing practices) is of major importance to marketers, advertising agencies, and public policymakers. This power has undergone two major structural changes. First, the definition of unfairness is now codified. Second, the ban on industry-wide regulations is now lifted. The author analyzes the structural evolution of the law, namely, the background, debate, and changes to the law, and concludes with implications for public policy and marketing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AzcuenagaM. L. (1992), “Remarks of Commissioner Mary L. Azcuenaga Before the Third International Conference on Consumer Law,” reprinted in CCH Trade Reg. Reporter, “Consumer Protection—FTC Views,” ¶ 50,076, 48, 785–791.
2.
AverittN. W. (1981), “The Meaning of ‘Unfair Acts or Practices’ in Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,”The Georgetown Law Journal, 70(1), 225–96.
3.
BallinS. D. (1993), statement in “FTC Reauthorization: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materials of the [House] Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R. 2243, A Bill to Amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to Extend the Authorization of Appropriations in Such Act,” 103rd Congress, 1st Session (May 26), Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office (CIS Doc # H361–8), at p. 189.
4.
Beneficial Corp. (1975), CCH (1973–1976 Transfer Binder) Trade Reg. Reports ¶ 20,959 at p. 20,820, cited and reiterated in Genesco Inc. (1977), 89 F.T.C. 451.
5.
BorkR. H. (1980), statement in “Unfairness: Views on Unfair Acts and Practices in Violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act,” Committee Print, 96th Congress, 2d Session (April), Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office (CIS Doc # S262–4), at p. 17.
6.
CalkinsS. (1990a), “Counsel's Summary: The ABA Special Committee's Report on the FTC (Kirkpatrick II),” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,7–17.
7.
CalkinsS. (1990b), “Kirkpatrick II: Counsel Responds,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.60–68.
8.
Danforth (1993), statement in Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1993,Congressional Record, 139, S. 12255.
9.
DingellJ. D. (1993), statement in Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1993,Congressional Record, 139, H. 3844.
10.
DingellJ. D. (1994), statement in Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1994,Congressional Record, 140, H. 6162.
11.
DunnW. N. (1994), Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, 2d ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
FTC v. Sperry and Hutchinson Co. (1972), 405 U.S. 233.
13.
Federal Trade Commission (1978), “Children's Advertising: Proposed Trade Regulation Ruling and Public Hearing,”Federal Register, 43, 17967.
14.
Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1994,Statutes at Large; 108, 1691. P.L. 103–312; reprinted in U.S. Code Cong & Ad. News, No. 7. (August 26).
15.
Fisher, Christy (1994), “How Congress Broke Unfair Ad Impasse,”Advertising Age, (August 22), 34.
16.
General Mills, Inc. (1980), statement in Unfairness: Views on Unfair Acts and Practices. Report prepared for Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. 96th Cong., 2d sess., (April). Committee Print, (CIS Doc # S262–4), 22.
17.
HelmD. F.Jr. (1993), statement in “FTC Reauthorization: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materials of the [House] Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R. 2243, A Bill to Amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to Extend the Authorization of Appropriations in Such Act,” 103rd Congress, 1st Session (May 26), Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office (CIS Doc # H361–8), at p. 97.
18.
HobbsC. O.III (1990), “Kirkpatrick II: Views of a Member of the Special Committee,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,18–21.
19.
HugickL., and LeonardJ. (1991), “The Perfect Meal: Something Old, Something New,”Gallop Poll Monthly, 314(November).
20.
JacobyJ., HandlinA., and SimonsonA. (1994), “Survey Evidence in Deceptive Advertising Cases Under the Lanham Act: An Historical Review of Comments From the Bench,”The Trademark Reporter, 84, 541–85.
21.
JonesM. G. (1990), “The Federal Trade Commission in 1968: Times of Turmoil and Response,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 71–84.
22.
KirkpatrickM. W. (1989), “Report of the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law Special Committee to Study the Role of the Federal Trade Commission,”Antitrust Law Journal, 58(1), 43–178.
23.
MoorheadC. J. (1994), statement in “Conference Report on H.R. 2243, Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1994,”Congressional Record, 140, H. 6162.
24.
OliverD. (1987), statement in “FTC Reauthorization: Hearings before the Consumer Subcommittee of the [Senate] Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation,” reprinted in CCH Trade Reg. Reporter, “FTC Reauthorization—Chairman's views,” ¶ 50,006, 48,531–534.
25.
OwenD. K. (1992), “Current FTC Advertising Issues and Enforcement Objectives,” reprinted in CCH Trade Reg. Reporter, “FTC Deceptive Advertising Enforcement—Commissioner's Views,” ¶ 50,089, 48,841–47.
26.
PearsonL. (1990), “Comments by a State Attorney General,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,31–34.
27.
PrestonI. (1989), “False or Deceptive Advertising Under the Lanham Act: Analysis of Factual Findings and Types of Evidence,”The Trademark Reporter, 79, 508–53.
28.
RatnerE. M., HellegersJ. F., SternG. P., OggR. C., AdairS., and ZachariasL. (1978), FTC Staff Report on Television Advertising to Children.Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
29.
RiceD. A. (1983), “Consumer Unfairness at the FTC: Misadventures in Law and Economics,”George Washington Law Review, 52, 1–6.
30.
RiceD. A., and KellerB. P. (1980), statement in “Unfairness: Views on Unfair Acts and Practices in Violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act,” Committee Print, 96th Congress, 2d Session (April), Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office (CIS Doc # S262–4), at p. 96.
31.
SchwartzT. M. (1977), “Regulating Unfair Practices Under the FTC Act: The Need For a Legal Standard of Unfairness,”Akron Law Review, 11(1), 1–28.
32.
SilbergeldM. (1990), “Remarks by a Consumer Advocate at Consumers Union,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,26–30.
33.
SilvergladeB. A. (1990), “Comments by a Consumer Advocate at the CSPI,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,22–25.
34.
SilvergladeB. A. (1993), statement in “FTC Reauthorization: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materials of the [House] Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R. 2243, A Bill to Amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to Extend the Authorization of Appropriations in Such Act,” 103rd Congress, 1st Session (May 26), Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office (CIS Doc # H361–8), at p. 213.
35.
SmithN. C., and QuelchJ. A., eds. (1993), Ethics in Marketing.Homewood, IL: Irwin Publishing.
36.
SnyderW. S. (1990), “The FTC and Advertising Regulation,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,35–39.
37.
Statement of Basis and Purpose of Trade Regulation Rule (1964), Part 408—Unfair or Deceptive Advertising and Labeling of Cigarettes in Relation to the Health Hazards of Smoking,Federal Register, 29, 8324.
38.
SteigerJ. D. (1992), statement in “FTC Reauthorization: Hearings before the Consumer Subcommittee of the [Senate] Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation,” reprinted in CCH Trade Reg. Reports, “FTC Reauthorization—Commission Statement,” ¶ 50,087,48,830–48,839.
39.
SteigerJ. D. (1994), statement in “FY 95 Commerce, Justice, State, Appropriations,” available on Lexis/Nexis.
40.
SternL. (1990), “‘The Federal Trade Commission: Going, Going,…,”’ Comments by a State Attorney General,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,40–44.
41.
U. S. Congress. House (1914), Federal Trade Commission, 63rd Cong., 2d sess., H.R. Conf. Rept. 1142
42.
U. S. Congress. House (1983), Federal Trade Commission Authorization Act of 1983, 98th Cong., 1st sess., H.R. Rept. 98–156 Part 1.
43.
U. S. Congress. House (1993), Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1993, 103d Cong., 1st sess., H.R. Rept. 103–138 Part 1.
44.
U. S. Congress. House (1994), Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1994, 103d Cong., 2nd sess., H.R. Conf. Rept. 103–617; reprinted in Congressional Record, 140, H. 6006.
45.
U. S. Congress. House. House Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous
46.
Materials (1993), “FTC Reauthorization: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materials of the [House] Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R. 2243, A Bill to Amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to Extend the Authorization of Appropriations in Such Act,” 103d Cong., 1st sess., (May 26). (CIS Doc # H361–8).
47.
Materials. Senate (1992), Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1992, 102d Cong. 2d sess., S. Rept. 102–446.
48.
Materials (1993), Federal Trade Commission Act Amendments of 1993, 103d Cong., 1st sess., S. Rept. 103–130.
49.
Materials Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (1980), “Unfairness: Views on Unfair Acts and Practices in Violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act,” Committee Print, 96th Cong., 2d sess., (April). (CIS Doc # S262–4).
50.
WilkieW. L. (1990), “The FTC: An Institution or an Instrument?” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,45–49.
51.
ZuckermanM. E. (1990), “The Federal Trade Commission in Historical Perspective: The First Fifty Years,” in Marketing and Advertising Regulation: The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s, MurphyP. E., and WilkieW. L., eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame,169–204.
