AdelsonAndrea (1993) “Jack in the Box Franchisees Cite Parent Concern in Suit,”New York Times, (July 9), C3.
2.
AreedaPhilip (1991), Antitrust Law, IX. Boston: Little Brown.
3.
BlairRoger D., and KasermanDavid L. (1983), Law and Economics of Vertical Integration and Control.New York: Academic Press.
4.
BlairRoger D., and KasermanDavid L. (1985), Antitrust Economics.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
5.
California Glazed Products v. Burns & Russell Co. (1983), 708 F. 2d 1423 (9th Cir.).
6.
Capital Temporaries, Inc. v. Alsten Corp. (1974), 506 F. 2d 658 (2d Cir.).
7.
Casey v. Diet Center (1984), 590 F. Supp. 1561 (N.D. Cal.).
8.
Department of Commerce (1991), Franchise Opportunities Handbook.Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.
9.
Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services (1992), 112 S. Ct. 2072.
10.
Former Enterprises v. United States Steel Corp. (1969), 394 U.S. 495.
11.
Genna v. Lady Foot International, Inc. (1986), 2 Trade Cases (CCH) ¶ 67,317 (E.D. Pa.).
12.
HayGeorge A. (1993), “Is the Glass Half-Empty or Half-Full?: Reflections on the Kodak Case,”Antitrust Law Journal, 62(Summer), 177–92.
13.
International Salt Co. v. United States (1947), 332 U.S. 392.
14.
Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. Morton Building, Inc. (1984) 737 F. 2d 698.
15.
Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde (1984), 466 U.S. 2.
16.
Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. v. Diversified Packaging Corp. (1974), 376 F. Supp. 1136 (S.D. Fla.).
17.
Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation v. Marion-Kay Co. (1985), 620 F. Supp. 1160 (S.D. Ind.).
18.
Krehl v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co. (1982), 664 F. 2d 1348 (9th Cir.).
19.
LandesWilliam M., and PosnerRichard A. (1981), “Market Power in Antitrust Cases,”Harvard Law Review, 94(March), 937–96.
20.
MakarScott D. (1988), “In Defense of Franchisors: The Law and Economics of Franchise Quality Assurance Mechanisms,”Villanova Law Review, 33(September), 721–66.
21.
McDavidJanet L. (1992), “Kodak Decision Revitalizes Tying Claims,”Franchise Law Journal, 12, (Summer), 3–7.
22.
Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc. (1984), 734 F. 2d 705 (7th Cir.).
23.
Mozart Co. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (1987), 833 F. 2d 1342 (9th Cir.).
24.
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States (1958), 356 U.S. 1.
25.
Power Test Petroleum Distributors v. Calcu Gas, Inc. (1985), 754 F. 2d 91 (2d Cir.).
26.
Principe v. McDonald's Corp. (1980), 631 F. 2d 303 (4th Cir.).
27.
SimsCalvin (1993), “How Jack in the Box is Confronting Its Nightmare,”New York Times, (July 10), 17.
28.
Smith v. Mobil Oil Corporation (1987), 667 F. Supp. 1314 (W.D. Mo.)
29.
SpivackGordon B., and EllisCarolyn T. (1993), “Kodak: Enlightened Antitrust Analysis and Traditional Tying Law,”Antitrust Law Journal, 62(Summer), 203–16.
30.
United States Steel Corp. v. Fortner Enterprises (1977), 429 U.S. 610.
31.
United States v. Loew's, Inc. (1962), 371 U.S. 38.
32.
Virtual Maintenance, Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc. (1993), 11 F. 3d 660 (6th Cir.).
33.
Will v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp. (1985), 776 F. 2d 665 (7th Cir.).