A public health warning is currently required for all alcoholic beverage containers in the United States. One factor in the effectiveness of this warning is its noticeability—the characteristics that influence whether or not it is likely to be seen. Three experiments addressed this aspect of the warning. Experiment 1 examined warning design factors on currently available containers and found that the warnings are not very noticeable. Experiments 2 and 3 examined four salience features (pictorial, color, signal icon, and border) and demonstrated that they could improve the likelihood that a warning will be seen. Overall, the research suggests ways of making warnings more salient and thus increasing the probability that they will have the desired effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsAustin S., and Lien-tsangHsu (1981), “The Coding of Symbol Signs,”Hazard Prevention (March/April), 5–7.
2.
Alcohol Beverage Labeling Act of 1988 (1988), Public Law 100-690, 27 USC 201-211 (November 18).
3.
American National Standards Institute (1987), American National Standard for Environmental and Facility Safety Signs, ANSI Z535.2-Draft-1987. New York.
4.
AndertonP. J., and ColeB. L. (1982), “Contour Separation and Sign Legibility,”Australian Road Research, 12(2), 103–9.
5.
AsperOrville (1972), “The Detectability of Two Slow Vehicle Warning Devices,”Journal of Safety Research, 4(2), 85–9.
6.
BanksWilliam P., and PrinzmetalWilliam (1976), “Configurational Effects in Visual Information Processing,”Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 361–7.
7.
BloomfieldJohn R. (1979), “Visual Search With Embedded Targets: Color and Texture Differences,”Human Factors, 21(3), 317–30.
8.
BresnahanThomas F. (1985), “The Hazard Association Value of Safety Signs,”Professional Safety, 30(7), 26–31.
9.
BresnahanThomas F., and BrykJoseph (1975), “The Hazard Association Values of Accident-Prevention Signs,”Professional Safety, 20(1), 17–25.
10.
CahillMary-Carol (1975), “Interpretability of Graphic Symbols as a Function of Context and Experience Factors,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 376–80.
11.
CarterRobert C., and CahillMary-Carol (1979), “Regression Models for Search Time for Color-Coded Information Displays,”Human Factors, 21(3), 293–302.
12.
ChristRichard E. (1975), “Review and Analysis of Color Coding Research for Visual Displays,”Human Factors, 17(6), 542–70.
13.
CochranDavid J., RileyMichael W., and DouglassEileen I. (1981), “An Investigation of Shapes for Warning Labels,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 395–9.
14.
CollinsBelinda L. (1983), “Evaluation of Mine-Safety Symbols,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 947–9.
15.
CollinsBelinda L., LernerNeil D., and PiermanB. C. (1982), Symbols for Industrial Safety, Tech. Report NBSIR 82-2485. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
16.
DorrisAlan L., and PurswellJerry L. (1978), “Human Factors in the Design of Effective Product Warnings,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 22nd Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 343–6.
17.
DreyfussH. (1970), Visual Communication: A Study of Symbols, SAE 700103. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1–7.
18.
EasterbyRonald S., and HakielSimon R. (1977), Safety Labeling of Consumer Products: Shape and Colour Code Stereotypes in the Design of Signs, AP Report No. 75. Birmingham, U.K.: College House, Gosta Green, University of Aston.
19.
EllsJerry G., and DewarRobert E. (1979), “Rapid Comprehension of Verbal and Symbolic Traffic Sign Messages,”Human Factors, 21(2), 161–8.
20.
EllsJerry G., DewarRobert E., and MilloyD. G. (1980), “An Evaluation of Six Configurations of the Railway Crossbuck Sign,”Ergonomics, 23(4), 359–67.
21.
FischerPaul M., RichardsJohn W., BermanEarl J., and KrugmanDean M. (1989), “Recall and Eye Tracking Study of Adolescents Viewing Tobacco Advertisements,”Journal of the American Medical Association, 261(1), 84–9.
FriedmannKeyla (1988), “The Effect of Adding Symbols to Written Warning Labels on User Behavior and Recall,”Human Factors, 30(4), 507–15.
24.
GodfreySandra S., RothsteinPamela R., and LaugheryKenneth R. (1985), “Warnings: Do They Make a Difference?” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 669–73.
25.
HindP. R., TrittB. H., and HoffmannE. R. (1976), “Effects of Level of Illumination, Strokewidth, Visual Angle and Contrast on the Legibility of Numerals of Various Fonts,” in ARRB Proceedings, Vol. 8. Perth, Australia: Australian Road Research Board, 46–55.
26.
HodgeDavid C. (1962), “Legibility of a Uniform-Strokewidth Alphabet: I. Relative Legibility of Upper and Lower Case Letters,”Journal of Engineering Psychology, 1(1), 34–46.
27.
HodgkinsonR., and HughesJ., (1982), “Developing Wordless Instructions: A Case History,”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 25(2), 74–9.
28.
JonesMari R. (1962), “Color Coding,”Human Factors, 4(4), 355–65.
29.
KellerA. D. (1972), “Evaluation of Graphic Symbols for Safety and Warning Signs,” unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota.
30.
KrampenM. (1969), “Signs and Symbols in Graphic Communication,”Design Quarterly, 62, 3–31.
31.
LaugheryKenneth R., and YoungStephen L. (1991a), “Consumer Product Warnings: Design Factors that Influence Noticeability,” in Proceeding of the 11th Congress, International Ergonomics Association.London: Taylor and Francis, Inc., 1104–6.
32.
LaugheryKenneth R., and YoungStephen L. (1991b), “An Eye-Scan Analysis of Accessing Warnings Information,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 585–9.
33.
LauxLila F., MayerDavid L., and ThompsonNellie B. (1989), “Usefulness of Symbols and Pictorials to Communicate Hazard Information,” in Proceedings of the Interface ‘89—The Sixth Symposium on Human Factors and Industrial Design in Consumer Products.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 79–83.
34.
LehtoMark R., and MillerJames M. (1986), Warnings: Volume I: Fundamentals, Design, and Evaluation Methodologies.Ann Arbor: Fuller Technical Publications.
35.
LeonardS. David, William HillG., and KarnesEdward W. (1989), “Risk Perception and Use of Warnings,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 550–4.
36.
LeonardS. David, MatthewsDavid, and KarnesEdward W. (1986), “How Does the Population Interpret Warnings Signals?” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 116–20.
37.
LernerNeil D., and CollinsBelinda L. (1980), The Assessment of Safety Symbol Understandability by Different Testing Methods, PB81-185647. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
38.
LernerNeil D., and CollinsBelinda L. (1983), “Symbol Sign Understandability When Visibility is Poor,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 944–6.
39.
LoewenthalA., and RileyM. W. (1980), “The Effectiveness of Warning Labels,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 24th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 389–91.
40.
LozanoR. D. (1980), “The Visibility, Colour and Measuring Requirements of Road Signs,”Lighting Research and Technology, 12(4), 206–12.
41.
Mackett-StoutJames, and DewarRichard E. (1981), “Evaluation of Symbolic Public Information Signs,”Human Factors, 23(2), 139–51.
42.
MayerDavid L., and LauxLila F. (1989), “Recognizability and Effectiveness of Warning Symbols and Pictorials,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 984–8.
43.
McCarthyJ. V., and HoffmannE. R. (1977), The Difficulty That Traffic Signs Present to Poor Readers.Commonwealth of Australia: Department of Transport, 1–201.
44.
MillerJames M., and LehtoMark R. (1984), Comments on 29 CFR 1910.145, report submitted to Documents Department, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, (June 1984).
45.
NeisserUlric (1967), Cognitive Psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
46.
OlsonRichard K., and AttneaveFred (1970), “What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping?”American Journal of Psychology, 83, 1–21.
47.
OtsuboShirley M. (1988), “A Behavioral Study of Warning Labels for Consumer Products: Perceived Danger and Use of Pictographs,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 536–40.
48.
PhillipsRichard J., and NoyesLiza (1980), “A Comparison of Colour and Visual Texture as Codes for Use as Area Symbols on Thematic Maps,”Ergonomics, 23(12), 1117–28.
49.
PrinzmetalWilliam, and BanksWilliam P. (1977), “Good Continuation Affects Visual Detection,”Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 389–95.
50.
RamseyJerry D., and BrinkleyWilliam A. (1977), “Enhanced Motorcycle Noticeability Through Daytime Use of Visual Signal Warning Devices,”Journal of Safety Research, 9(2), 77–84.
51.
RileyMichael W., CochranDavid J., and BallardJohn L. (1982), “An Investigation of Preferred Shapes for Warning Labels,”Human Factors, 24(6), 737–42.
52.
SchneiderKenneth C. (1977), “Prevention of Accidental Poisoning Through Package and Label Design,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4(September), 67–74.
53.
TriesmanAnne (1986), “Features and Objects in Visual Perception,”Scientific American, 255, 114–24.
WheatleyElizabeth (1977), “An Experiment on Coding Preferences for Display Symbols,”Ergonomics, 20(5), 543–52.
56.
WogalterMichael S., FontenelleGail A., and LaugheryKenneth R. (1985), “Behavioral Effectiveness of Warnings,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 599–612.
57.
WogalterMichael S., GodfreySandra S., FontenelleGail A., DesaulniersDavid R., RothsteinPamela R., and LaugheryKenneth R. (1987), “Effectiveness of Warnings,”Human Factors, 29(5), 599–612.
58.
YoungStephen L., and WogalterMichael S. (1988), “Memory of Instruction Manual Warnings: Effects of Pictorial Icons and Conspicuous Print,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 905–9.
59.
YoungStephen L., and WogalterMichael S. (1990), “Effects of Conspicuous Print and Pictorial Icons on Comprehension and Memory of Instruction Manual Warnings,”Human Factors, 32(6), 637–49.
60.
ZlotnikMorris A. (1982), “The Effects of Warning Message Highlighting on Novel Assembly Task Performance,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting.Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 93–7.
