Regulation of Commercial Speech: Did the 1993 Supreme Court Decisions Clarify the Scope of First Amendment Protection?

Bigelow v. Virginia (1975), 421 U.S. 809.

Board of Trustees, State University of New York v. Fox (1989), 492 U.S. 469.

Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York (1980), 447 U.S. 557.

City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc. (1993), 61 USLW 4272.

Edenfield v. Fane (1993), 61 USLW 4431.

Moser et al. v. Federal Communications Commission (1993), 826 F. Supp. 360.

Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association (1978), 436 U.S.447.

Petty Ross D. (1993a), “Advertising and the First Amendment: A Practical Test for Distinguishing Commercial Speech from Fully Protected Speech,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12(2), 170–77.

Petty Ross D. (1993b), “Legal Developments in Marketing—Joe Camel and the Commission: The Real Legal Issues,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12(2), 276–81.

Posadas de Puerto Rico Assoc. v. Tourism Co. (1986), 478 U.S. 328.

United States and Federal Communications Commission v. Edge Broadcasting Company (1993), 61 USLW 4759.

Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. (1976), 425 U.S. 748.

Ward v. Rock Against Racism (1989), 491 U.S. 781.