The law of comparative advertising has evolved from providing virtually no legal remedy for misleading claims to enjoining most advertising challenged by competitors under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. This article first examines the historical evolution of the law and then analyzes the seventy-one reported comparative advertising Lanham Act cases through mid-1989 to determine the effects of both the advertising and the lawsuits on consumers and competition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
“Actionable Nature of Advertising Disparaging or Criticizing Merchandise or Products” (1958), American Law Reports, 2d ed. annotation, 57, 837–849.
2.
ALPO Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co. (1990), 913 F.2d 958 (D.C. Cir.).
3.
American Home Products Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson (1978), 557 F.2d 160 (2d Cir.).
4.
AverittNeil W. (1980), “The Meaning of ‘Unfair Methods of Competition’ in Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,”Boston College Law Review, 21(2) 227–300.
5.
Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Hertz Corp. (1986), 782 F.2d 381 (2d Cir.).
6.
BealesHoward J. (1991), “What State Regulators Can Learn From the Federal Experience in Regulating Advertising,”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(1), 101–117.
7.
Beck-DudleyCaryn L., and WilliamsTerrell G. (1989), “Legal and Public Policy Implications for the Future of Comparative Advertising: A Look at U-Haul v. Jartran,”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 8, 124–142.
8.
BestArthur (1985), “Controlling False Advertising: A Comparative Study of Public Regulation, Industry Self-Policing, and Private Litigation,”Georgia Law Review, 20(Fall), 1–72.
9.
BixbyMichael B., and LincolnDouglas J (1989), “Legal Issues Surrounding the Use of Comparative Advertising: What the Non-prescriptive Drug Industry Has Taught Us,”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 8, 143–160.
10.
BuchananBruce, and GoldmanDoron (1989), “Us v. Them: The Minefield of Comparative Ads,”Harvard Business Review, 67(3) 38–50.
11.
CalvaniTerry (1989), “Advertising Regulation: The States v. FTC,”Antitrust Law Journal, 58(1), 253–266.
12.
Colligan v. Activities Club of NY, Ltd. (1971), 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 US 1004.
13.
DarbyMichael R., and KarniEdi (1973), “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud,”Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67.
14.
“Developments in the Law: Competitive Torts” (1964), Harvard Law Review, note, 77, 888–978.
15.
Federal Trade Commission (1979), “In Regard to Comparative Advertising,”Code of Federal Regulations, 6 16 (1) Sec. 14.15 (1989 ed.), 144-145.
FordGary T., SmithDarlene B., and SwasyJohn L. (1988), “An Empirical Test of the Search, Experience, and Credence Attributes Framework,”Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 234–238.
18.
FreemanMeryl (1987), “Comparative Cautions,”Marketing and Media Decisions, (Spring), 78–86.
19.
Fur Information Fashion Council v. E.F. Timme & Son (1974), 501 F.2d 1048 (2d Cir.).
20.
GigesNancy (1980), “Comparative Ads: Battles That Wrote Dos and Don'ts,”Advertising Age, (September 29), 59–64.
21.
GreiweNancy S. (1982), “Antidilution Statutes: A New Attack on Comparative Advertising,”Trademark Reporter, 72(2) 717–803.
22.
Hibschman (1940), “Defamation of Disparagement,”Minnesota Law Review, 24, 625.
23.
H.L. Hayden Co. v. Siemens Medical Systems (1987), 672 F. Supp. 724 (S.D.N.Y).
24.
HurwitzJames D. (1985), “Abuse of Governmental Processes, The First Amendment, and the Boundaries of ‘Noerr’,”Georgetown Law Journal, 74(1), 65–126.
25.
Invicta Plastics (USA) Ltd. v. Mego Corp. (1981), 523 F. Supp. 619 (S.D.N.Y.).
26.
JacobyJacob, and HoyerWayne D. (1990), “The Miscomprehension of Mass-Media Advertising Claims: A Re-Analysis of Benchmark Data,”Journal of Advertising Research, 29, 9–16.
27.
JainSubhash C., and HacklemanEdwin C. (1978), “How Effective is Comparative Advertising for Stimulating Brand Recall?”Journal of Advertising Research, 7(3), 20–25.
28.
KellerBruce P. (1985), “How Do You Spell Relief? Private Regulation of Advertising Under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act,”Trademark Reporter, 75, 227–248.
29.
LevyRobert (1987), “Big Resurgence in Comparative Ads,”Dun's Business Month, (February), 56–58.
30.
MacCloudWilliam (1990), “The Federal Trade Commission 75th Anniversary Symposium,”Antitrust Law Journal, remarks, 58, 797, 820-821.
31.
McKenneyCharles E., and LongGeorge F.III (1989), Federal Unfair Competition: Lanham Act Sec. 43(a).New York: Clark Boardman, Inc.
32.
McNeilab, Inc. v. American Home Products Corp. (1988), 848 F.2d 34 (2d Cir.).
33.
MuehlingDarrel D., and KangunNorman (1985), “The Multi- Dimensionality of Comparative Advertising: Implications for the Federal Trade Commission,”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 4, 112–118.
34.
NelsonPhillip (1974), “Advertising as Information,”Journal of Political Economy, 82, 729.
35.
PBX Enterprises, Inc v. Audiofidelity Enterprises, Inc. (1987), 818 F.2d 266 (2d Cir.).
36.
PettyRoss D. (1990), “Comparative Advertising Law in the 1990s,”North Atlantic Business Law Review, 23, 159–175.
37.
PettyRoss D. (1991a), “Competitor Suits Against False Advertising: Is Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act a Pro-consumer Rule or Anti-competitive Tool?”University of Baltimore Law Review, 20(2), (forthcoming).
38.
PettyRoss D. (1991b), “FTC Advertising Regulation: Survivor or Casualty of the Reagan Revolution,”American Business Law Journal, 29(4), (forthcoming).
39.
PettyRoss D. (1991c), “Supplanting Government Regulation with Competitor Lawsuits: The Case of Controlling False Advertising,”Indiana Law Review, 25(2), (forthcoming).
40.
PitofskyRobert (1977), “Beyond Nader: Consumer Protection and the Regulation of Advertising,”Harvard Law Review, 90(4), 661–701.
41.
Playskool, Inc. v. Product Development Group, Inc. (1988), 699 F. Supp. 1056 (E.D.N.Y.).
42.
PlevanKenneth A., and SirokyMiriam L. (1988), Advertising Compliance Handbook.New York: Practising Law Institute.
43.
PrestonIvan L. (1989), “False or Deceptive Advertising Under the Lanham Act: An Analysis of Factual Findings and Types of Evidence,”Trademark Reporter, 79(4), 508–553.
44.
PrestonIvan L., and RichardsJef I. (1986), “Consumer Miscomprehension As a Challenge to the FTC Prosecution of Deceptive Advertising,”John Marshall Law Review, 19(3), 605–635.
45.
PridgenDee, and PrestonIvan L. (1980), “Enhancing the Flow of Information in the Marketplace: From Caveat Emptor to Virginia Pharmacy and Beyond at the Federal Trade Commission,”Georgia Law Review, 14(4), 635–680.
46.
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Chesebrough-Pond's. Inc. (1984), 747 F.2d 114 (2d Cir.).
47.
ProsserWilliam (1971), The Law Of Torts, (4th ed.) St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co.
48.
RingoldDebra Jones, and CalfeeJohn E. (1989), “The Information Content of Cigarette Advertising: 1926-1986,”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 8, 1–23.
49.
RogersJohn C., and WilliamsTerrell G. (1989), “Comparative Advertising Effectiveness: Practitioners’ Perceptions Versus Academic Research Findings,”Journal of Advertising Research, (October/November), 22–37.
Sandoz Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc. (1990), 902 F.2d 222 (3d Cir.).
52.
Saxlehner v. Wagner (1910), 216 US 375.
53.
ScammonDebra (1978), “Comparative Advertising: A Reexamination of the Issues,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 12(2), 381–392.
54.
ShaughnessyRobert J. (1987), “Trademark Parody: A Fair Use and First Amendment Analysis,”Trademark Reporter, 77, 177–215.
55.
Southern Shows, Inc. v. Exposition Enterprises, Inc. (1985), 226 U.S.P.Q. 351 (W.D.N.C.).
56.
Sterling Drug Co. v. FTC (1984), 741 F.2d 1146 (9th Cir.).
57.
SterkStewart E. (1976), “The Law of Comparative Advertising: How Much Worse Is ‘Better’ Than ‘Great’,”Columbia Law Review76, 80–112.
58.
SwayneLinda E., and StevensonThomas H. (1987), “Comparative Advertising in Horizontal Business Publications,”Industrial Marketing Management, 16, 71–76.
59.
TrachtenbergJeffrey A. (1989), “New Law Adds Risk to Comparative Ads,”The Wall Street Journal, (June 1), B6.
60.
Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. (1980), 626 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir.).
61.
U-Haul Int'l, Inc. v. Jartran, Inc. (1986), 793 F.2d 1034 (9th Cir.).
62.
UlanoffStanley (1975), “Comparative Advertising: An Historical Retrospective,”Marketing Science Institute, working paper.
63.
Upjohn Co. v. Riahom Corp. (1986), 641 F. Supp. 1209 (D. Del.).
