An overview is presented of the recent conflict between state and federal authorities regarding the regulation of national advertising. Multistate regulatory efforts have raised questions about the legality of state restrictions on national ads. Although the answers may vary as different federal agencies become involved, it is concluded that state actions represent no legal conflict with those of the Federal Trade Commission. Because states are expected to continue playing an important role in national advertising, policy researchers must adjust to this change in regulatory environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Administrative Procedure Act (1982), 5 U.S.C. Sect. 551 et seq.
2.
Alaska v. U.S. Department of Transportation (1989), 868 F.2d 441 (D.C. Cir.).
3.
American Bar Association (1969), Report of the ABA Commission to Study the Federal Trade Commission.
4.
Amendment to the Federal Trade Commission Act (1985), S. 1313, 99th Congress, 1st Session, (June 18).
5.
Amendment to the Federal Trade Commission Act (1988), S.2525, 100th Congress, 2d Session, (June 16).
6.
American Bar Association (1989), “Report of the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law Special Committee to Study the Role of the Federal Trade Commission,”Antitrust Regulation Reporter, 56, 1410 (April 6).
7.
American Financial Services v. FTC (1985), 767 F.2d 957 (D.C. Cir.), denied 475 U.S. 1011 (1986).
8.
BaerWilliam J. (1988), “At the Turning Point: The Commission in 1978,”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 7, 11–20.
ColfordSteven W. (1986), “Push on for more state ad control: Ad industry resists ‘balkanization,'”Advertising Age, (December 15), 82.
16.
ColfordSteven W. (1990), “Ad-bashing is back in style,”Advertising Age, (April 30), 4.
17.
CoxE., FellmethR., and SchulzJ. (1969), “The Nader Report” on the Federal Trade Commission.New York: R.W. Baron.
18.
FarmerSusan Beth (1989), “Introduction: National Consumer Protection Enforcement,”Antitrust Law Journal, 58, 245–246.
19.
Federal Trade Commission Act (1982), 15 U.S.C. Sect. 41 et seq.
20.
Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-252, 94 Stat. 374 (May 28).
21.
Federal Trade Commission Reauthorization (1982), Hearings before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Transportation, and Tourism of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, 97th Congress, 2d Session, (April).
22.
Federal Trade Commission Reauthorization (1985), Hearings before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Transportation, and Tourism of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, 99th Congress, 1st Session, (April).
23.
Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. de La Cuesta (1982), 458 U.S. 141.
24.
FordGary T., and CalfeeJohn E. (1986), “Recent Developments in FTC Policy on Deception,”Journal of Marketing, 50, 82–103.
25.
Frothingham v. Mellon (1923), 262 U.S. 447.
26.
GarfieldBob (1989), “Quaker Oat Bran ad lacks moral fiber,”Advertising Age, (June 26), 78.
27.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), 9 Wheat. 1.
28.
HamiltonMartha M. (1986), “Just Because It Melts, That Doesn't Mean It's Cheese,”Washington Post (National Weekly Edition), (April 21), 6.
29.
HindsMichael deCourcy (1982), “A Curious Push to Weaken F.T.C,”New York Times, (November 14).
30.
JohnsonKevin (1985), “N.Y. prosecutor nails ad claims,”USA Today, (July 5), 2B.
31.
JonesMary Gardiner (1988), “The Federal Trade Commission in 1968: Times of Turmoil and Response,”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 7, 1–10.
32.
Kansas v. Trans World Airlines (1990), 730 F.Supp. 366 (D.Kan.).
33.
LawrenceJennifer (1987), “Airlines lash out at ad guidelines,”Advertising Age, (September 28), 28.
LawrenceJennifer (1988c), “States Investigate Nabisco, P&G: Labeling, ad claims at issue,”Advertising Age, (August 22), 71.
37.
LawrenceJennifer (1988d), “State ad rules face showdown: Victory could bolster national role,”Advertising Age, (November 28), 4.
38.
LawrenceJennifer (1988e), “Airlines give in: NAAG scores surcharge ad victory,”Advertising Age, (December 19), 45.
39.
LawrenceJennifer, and HumeScott (1988), “ANA hits NAAG: Responds to car- rental ad rules, “Advertising Age, (October 24), 2.
40.
Lewis v. BT Inv. Managers (1980), 447 U.S. 27.
41.
MattoxJames (1988), “Should states regulate ads?”Advertising Age, (August 8), 18.
42.
MurphyJohn H., and RichardsJef I. (1990), “An Investigation of the Effects of Disclosure Statements in Rental Car Advertisements,” unpublished Manuscript, Department of Advertising, University of Texas.
43.
National Association of Attorneys General (1988a), Task Force on the Airline Travel Industry: Guidelines and Commentary, (April).
44.
National Association of Attorneys General (1988b), Final Guidelines of the Task Force on Car Rental Industry Advertising and Practices, (November).
45.
New York v. Trans World Airlines (1989), 728 F.Supp 162 (S.D.N.Y.).
Pepper, Hamilton, & Scheetz (1990a), “FTC, State AGs, FDA, Stake Out Divergent Positions on Health Claims for Food,”Advertising Law Update, 3(1), 1.
55.
Pepper, Hamilton, & Scheetz (1990b), “State AGs, FTC Commence Broad Inquiries Into Environmental Advertising Claims,”Advertising Law Update, 3(1), 4.
56.
Pike v. Bruce Church (1970), 397 U.S. 137.
57.
PollakDale, and TeichnerBruce (1985), “The Federal Trade Commission's Deception Enforcement Policy,”DePaul Law Review, 35, 125–159.
58.
Posadas de Puerto Rico v. Tourism Co. (1986), 478 U.S. 328.
59.
PrestonIvan L., and RichardsJef I. (1986), “Consumer Miscomprehension as a Challenge to FTC Prosecutions of Deceptive Advertising,”John Marshall Law Review, 19, 605–630.
60.
Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator (1947), 331 U.S. 218.
61.
RichardsJef I. (1990), Deceptive Advertising: Behavioral Study of a Legal Concept.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62.
RomanKenneth (1989), “The Neo-Prohibitionists,”AAAA Newsletter, (March, 6).
63.
Southern Railway v. Railroad Commission of Indiana (1915), 236 U.S. 439.
64.
SteigerJanet (1989), “Consumer Protection Partners: A Federal- State Approach,”American Advertising, 5(4), 18–20.
65.
StephanRobert T. (1989), “National Consumer Protection Enforcement,”Antitrust Law Journal, 58, 247–251.
66.
StrattonHal (1988), “Should states regulate ads?”Advertising Age, (October 8), 18.
67.
StrenioAndrew J. (1988), “The FTC in 1988: Phoenix or Finis?”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 7, 21–39.
68.
SullivanE. Thomas, and MarksBrian A. (1986), “The FTC's Deceptive Advertising Policy: A Legal and Economic Analysis,”Oregon Law Review, 64, 593–635.
69.
Trans World Airlines v. Mattox (1989), 712 F.Supp. 99 (W.D.Tex.).
70.
Trans World Airlines v. Mattox (1990), U.S. App. LEXIS 4712 (5th Cir.).
71.
U.S. Steel v. Multistate Tax Commission (1978), 434 U.S. 452.
72.
Washington Post (1978), “The FTC as National Nanny,” (March 1), A22.
