Punitive damages claims have increased substantially in the 1980s for both manufacturing and marketing practices, resulting in several well-publicized awards to injured consumers. In this article the current status of punitive damages for intentional marketing wrongdoing is reviewed. Likely future developments and suggestions for marketers are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenRichard (1987), “Controlling the Growth of Punitive Damages in Products Liability,”Corporate Practice Commentator, 29 (Fall), 389–412.
2.
American Cyanamid Co. v. Frankson (1987), 732 S.W.2d 648 (Tex. Ct. App.).
3.
AttanasioJohn B. (1988), “The Principle of Aggregate Autonomy and the Calabresian Approach to Products Liability,”Virginia Law Review, 74 (May), 677–750.
4.
AusnessRichard C. (1986), “Retribution and Deterrence: The Role of Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation,”Kentucky Law Journal, 74 (Winter), 1–125.
5.
BellGriffin and PearcePerry E. (1987), “Punitive Damages and the Tort System,”University of Richmond Law Review, 22 (Fall), 1–17.
6.
BelliMelvin M. (1980), “Punitive Damages: Their History, Their Use and Their Worth in Present-Day Society,”University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 49 (Fall), 1–23.
7.
BergerRobert G. (1988), “The Impact of Tort Law Development on Insurance: The Availability/Affordability Crisis and Its Potential Solutions,”American University Law Review, 37 (Winter), 285–321.
8.
BrogdonGino M. (1987), “Insuring Punitive Damages: A Closer Look at Public Policy Analysis,”Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly, 37 (Summer), 369–97.
Hurley v. Lederle Laboratories Division of American Cyanamid Co. (1988), 851 F.2d 1536 (5th Cir.), In re School Asbestos Litigation (1986), 789 F.2d 996 (3rd Cir.).
32.
Jane Doe v. Miles Laboratories, Inc. (1987), 675 F. Supp. 1466 (D. Md.).
JohnstonJason S. (1987), “Punitive Liability: A New Paradigm of Efficiency in Tort Law,”Columbia Law Review, 87 (November), 1385–1446.
35.
Juzwin v. Amtorg Trading Corp. (1989), No. 87–3876, Slip Op. (D. N.J., March 9).
36.
Karns v. Emerson Electric Co. (1987), 817 F.2d 1452 (10th Cir.).
37.
KenefickAndrew M. (1987), “The Constitutionality of Punitive Damages Under the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment—Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977),” Michigan Law Review, 85 (June), 1699–1726.
38.
Klein v. Sears Roebuck and Co. (1985), 773 F.2d 1421 (4th Cir.).
39.
Kociemba v. G. D. Searle & Co. (1988), 680 F. Supp. 1293 (D. Minn.).
40.
KotlerMarvin A. (1988), “Motivation and Tort Law: Acting for Economic Gain as a Suspect Motive,”Vanderbilt Law Review, 41 (January), 63–113.
41.
Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp. (1981), 424 N.E.2d 568 (Ohio).
42.
Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. Isom (1982), 657 P.2d 293 (Utah).
MaremaLenore S. (1989), “Public Regulation of Insurance Law: Annual Survey,”Tort & Insurance Law Journal, 24 (Winter), 472–.
48.
Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1983), 469 A.2d 655 (Pa. Super. Ct.).
49.
MorganFred W. (1984), “Punitive Damages Awards for Flagrant Mismarketing of Products,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 3, 113–24.
50.
O'Donnell, Nanette A. (1988), “Punitive Damages in Florida Negligence Cases: How Much Negligence is Enough?”University of Miami Law Review, 42 (January), 803–28.
51.
O'Gilvie v. International Playtex, Inc. (1988), cert denied, 108 S.Ct. 2014, aff'd in part, rev'd in part and rem'd, 821 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir. 1987), 609 F. Supp. 817 (D. Kan. 1985).
52.
OwenDavid G. (1976), “Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation,”Michigan Law Review, 74 (June), 1258–1371.
53.
OwenDavid G. (1982), “Problems in Assessing Punitive Damages Against Manufacturers of Defective Products,”University of Chicago Law Review, 49 (Spring), 1–58.
54.
Palmer v. A. H. Robins Co., Inc. (1984), 684 P.2d 187 (Colo.).
55.
ParnellAlbert H. (1987), “An Aggressive Defense Against Punitive Damages Claims,”For The Defense, 29 (November), 25–31.
56.
Patton v. Mid-Continent Systems, Inc. (1988), 841 F.2d 742 (7th Cir.).
57.
Petrus Chrysler-Plymouth v. Davis (1984), 283 Ark. 172, 671 S.W.2d 749.
58.
PriestGeorge L. (1987), “The Current Insurance Crisis and Modern Tort Law,”Yale Law Journal, 96 (June), 1521–73.
59.
Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc. (1967), 378 F.2d 832 (2d Cir.).
60.
School District of the City of Independence, Missouri v. U.S. Gypsum Co. (1988), 750 S.W.2d 442 (Mo. Ct. App.).
61.
SchwartzAlan (1988), “Proposals for Products Liability Reform: A Theoretical Synthesis,”Yale Law Journal, 97 (February), 353–82.
62.
SeltzerRichard A. (1983), “Punitive Damages in Mass Tort Litigation: Addressing the Problem of Fairness and Control,”Fordham Law Review, 52 (October), 37–92.
63.
SheehanLorraine M. (1987), “Setting the Appropriate Standard for Punitive Damages in Florida Products Liability Cases—Chrysler Corp. v. Wolmer, 499 So.2d 923 (Fla. 1986),” Stetson Law Review, 17 (Fall), 275–93.
64.
Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. (1988), 855 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir.).
65.
SternRobert J. and LoughheadD. Jackson (1987), “Vicarious Liability for Punitive Damages: The Worst Side of a Questionable Doctrine,”Defense Counsel Journal, 54 (January), 29–36.
66.
Tetuan v. A. H. Robins Co. (1987), 241 Kan. 441, 738 P.2d 1210.
67.
Toole v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc. (1967), 251 Cal.App.2d 689, 60 Cal.Rptr. 398.
68.
The Wall Street Journal (1989a), “California High Court Makes Mark on Law by Limiting Damages,” (July 7), A1, A6.
69.
The Wall Street Journal (1989b), “Constitution 1, Punitive Damages 0,” (March 10), A14.
70.
The Wall Street Journal (1989c), “If Pennzoil Won $11 Billion, Why Not Me?” (April 20), A14.
71.
The Wall Street Journal (1989d), “Is the Constitution Punitive?” (April 20), A14.
72.
The Wall Street Journal (1989e), “Justices Express Skepticism on Bid to Limit Damages,” (April 19), B11.