Goods recalls occur with unfortunate regularity, primarily due to sellers’ mistakes, but occasionally because of product tamperings. In either situation the legal environment affects what the marketer can and should do. In this paper, the current legal environment influencing recalls is reviewed, and resultant implications for marketers are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advertising Age (1986), “Combating Drug Terrorism,” (February 27), 54.
2.
American Cyanamid Corp. v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc. (1986), 800 F.2d 306, 231 U.S.P.Q. 128 (2d Cir.).
Bhagvandoss v. Beiersdorf, Inc. (1987), slip op. No. 68306 (Mo.).
8.
BettmanJames R., PayneJohn W., and StaelinRichard (1986), “Cognitive Considerations in Designing Effective Labels for Presenting Risk Information,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 5, 1–28.
9.
BolandJohn C. (1978), “Total Recall? Federal Product Safety Moves Cost Industry a Bundle,”Barrons, (August 7), 9, 22, 24, 26, 31.
10.
Broadcasting (1986), “Tylenol Murder Prompts Ad Move,” (February 24), 37.
11.
Business Insurance (1986a), “Tylenol Decision to Cost J&J about $150 Million,” (February 24), 2, 18.
12.
Business Insurance (1986b), “Recall Coverage Crisis on Horizon,” (April 29), 17.
13.
CodyJames L. (1972), “Food Recalls,”Food, Drug, Cosmetic Law Journal, 27 (December), 336–352.
14.
Craig v. A. H. Robins Co., Inc. (1986), 790 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.).
15.
DeBenedictisDon J. (1986), “Gerber Suit Tests State's Regulatory Power,”Los Angeles Daily Journal, (February 25), 5.
16.
Direct Marketing (1986), “WATS Operating Tylenol Exchange,” (April), 4–5.
17.
Economist (1986), “Headache? And How,” (February 22), 30.
18.
FDCA (1982), Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, United States Code, v. 21, §§301–392.
19.
FDCA (1984), Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Code of Federal Regulations, v. 21.
FiskGeorge and ChandranRajan (1975), “How to Trace and Recall Products,”Harvard Business Review, 62 (November-December), 90–96.
22.
Ford Motor Company v. William R. Durrill (1986), 714 S.W.2d 329 (Tex. Ct. App.).
23.
ForgaysJanice Alexander (1985), “The Food and Drug Administration's Power to Recall a Harmful Product and Other Remedial Actions: The Powerless Consumer,”Vermont Law Review, 10 (Spring, 129–150.
24.
Fortune (1986), “Switching to Caplets—Tylenol Case,” (March 17), 8.
25.
FTCA (1982), Federal Trade Commission Act, United States Code, v. 15.
26.
Freddie Wright v. General Motors Corp. (1986), No. 01-85-1049-CV (Tex. Ct. App.).
GuzzardiWalterJr. (1979), “The Mindless Pursuit of Safety,”Fortune, (April 9), 54–56, 58, 60, 62, 64.
29.
HarperBlake M. (1981), “Mandatory Food and Drug Recalls: An Analysis of a Developing FDA Enforcement Tool,”Food, Drug, Cosmetic Law Journal, 36 (December), 669–687.
30.
HerbrandJohn S. (1986), “Products Liability: Admissibility, Against Manufacturer, of Product Recall Letter,”Annotated Law Reports-3rd, 84, 1220–1248.
31.
HersbergenRonald L. (1982), “Consumer Protection,”Louisiana Law Review, 42 (Winter), 513–540.
32.
HindsMichael deCourcy (1983), “The Federal Highway Safety Agency Isn't Doing Its Job: The Reagan Administration Has Been Cautious About Forcing Automobile Recalls,”Los Angeles Daily Journal, (March 14), 6.
33.
IrvinRobert W. (1972), “Auto Recalls: Making Good, After Their Fashion,”The Nation, (July 24), 46–49.
34.
KarrAlbert R. and ApcarLeonard M. (1978), “Car Trouble: Government Pressure Propels Auto Recalls Toward a New High,”Wall Street Journal, (August 16), 1, 33
35.
KrulwichAndrew S. (1984), “Recalls: Legal and Corporate Responses to FDA, CPSC, NHTSA, and Product Liability Considerations,”The Business Lawyer, 39 (February), 757–780.
36.
Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & CIE, and Cosmair, Inc. v. LB International Corp. (1986), Slip Op. (D. N.Y.).
37.
LetsouPeter V. (1986), “A Time-Dependent Model of Products Liability,”University of Chicago Law Review, 53 (Winter), 209–229.
38.
LevensonMark (1979), “Recalls: Tracing Them Back to the Turn of the Century,”Dun's Review, (January), 117, 119.
39.
LevyRobert and LevensonMark (1979), “A Record Year for Recalls,”Dun's Review, (January), 28, 30–34.
40.
LushboughChanning H. (1980), “A Food Company's Approach to the Inspectional Process,”Food, Drug, Cosmetic Law Journal, 35 (August), 436–450.
41.
MaessJean E. (1986), “Validity and Construction of ‘Sistership’ Clause of Products Liability Insurance Policy Excepting from Coverage Cost of Product Recall or Withdrawal of Product from Market,”Annotated Law Reports - 4th, 32, 630–671.
42.
MalicksonDavid L. (1983), “Are You Ready for a Product Recall?”Business Horizons, 26 (January-February), 31–35.
43.
MalicksonDavid L. (1982), “Product Recall's New Respectability,”Public Relations Journal, 38 (December), 25–26.
PyattRudolph A.Jr. (1986), “Gerber vs. Maryland—Glass in Baby Food Leads to Banning,”Washington Post, (February 28), C9.
54.
RampDavid L. (1977), “The Impact of Recall Campaigns on Products Liability,”Insurance Counsel Journal, 44 (January), 83–96.
55.
ReavesLynne (1983), “Risky Business: Recall Itself Unsafe, Prof Says,”American Bar Association Journal, 69 (July), 887–888.
56.
RobbGary C. (1983), “Practical and Legal Implications in Recalling Dangerous Products,”National Law Journal, 6 (October 17), 22.
57.
SinclairUpton (1906), The Jungle, New York: Bradley.
58.
SklarenCary Stewart (1986), “The Effect of Current NHTSA Regulations and Enforcement Policy on Products Liability in the Motor Vehicle Industry,”Tort & Insurance Law Journal, 21 (Spring), 464–472.
59.
SmithStephen A. (1975), “Recall Campaigns: A Possible Defense to Products Liability,”Insurance Counsel Journal, 42 (January), 77–91.
60.
Time (1986a), “A Hard Decision to Swallow,” (March 3), 59.
61.
Time (1986b), “Capsule Terror—First Tylenol, Now Contac,” (March 31), 27.
62.
TobinRichard J. (1982), “Recalls and the Remediation of Hazardous or Defective Consumer Products: The Experiences of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 16 (Winter), 278–306.
63.
Trial (1983), “Recalls Include Autos, Fans, and Toothbrush Trainer Sets,” 19 (October), 21.
64.
Traux & Hovey, Ltd. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (1986), 122 A.D. 2d 563, 504 N.Y.S.2d 934 (N.Y. App.Div.).
65.
United States v. K-N Enterprises, Inc. (1978), 461 F.Supp. 988 (N.D. Ill.).
66.
United States v. Lit Drug Co. (1971), 333 F.Supp. 990 (D. N.J.).
67.
United States v. Lanpar Co. (1968), 293 F.Supp. 147 (D. Tex.).
68.
United States Code (1982), vol. 15, §2072.
69.
U.S. News & World Report (1986), “Tampering with Buyers’ Confidence,” (March 3), 46–47.
70.
Volkswagen (1987), FTC Dkt. No. 9154 (April 16).
71.
ViscusiW. Kip (1985), “Consumer Behavior and the Safety Effect of Product Safety Regulations,”Journal of Law & Economics, 28 (October), 527–553.
72.
WerberStephen J. (1979), “Automobile Recall Campaigns: Proposals for Legislative and Judicial Responses,”University of Detroit Journal of Urban Law, 56 (No. 2), 1083–1120.
73.
Woodland Mobile Homes, Inc. (1979), 94 F.T.C. 290 (consent order).
74.
ZikmundWillian G. and StantonWilliam J. (1971), “Recycling Solid Wastes: A Channels-of-Distribution Problem,”Journal of Marketing, 35 (July), 34–39.