This paper uses the controversy surrounding the Federal Trade Commission's 1983 Policy Statement on Deception as a focal point for discussing whether consumers are adequately protected from deceptive advertising, and, whether businesses have been given a clear direction regarding advertising rules. The role of the states, private litigation, and self-regulation are also assessed in terms of their ability to help control advertising deception in the marketplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advertising Age, “NAAG Stirs Up Controversy,” March 14, 1988, p. 12.
ArmstrongGary M. and OzanneJulie L., “An Evaluation of NAD/NARB Purpose and Performance,”Journal of Advertising, vol. 12, iss. 3, September 1983, pp. 15–16.
4.
BaileyP. and PertschukM., “Deception and Policy Statement on Deception,”45 ATRR 689 (October 27, 1984).
5.
BestArthur, “Controlling False Advertising: A Comparison Study of Public Regulation, Industry Self-Policing, and Private Litigation,”Georgia Law Review, vol. 20, Fall 1985, pp. 1–72.
6.
BNA Daily Executive Report, December 22, 1983, pp. 1052–3.
7.
BoddewynJ.J., “Advertising Regulation: Fiddling with the FTC While the World Burns,”Business Horizons, vol. 28, iss. 3, May/June 1985, pp. 32–40.
8.
CraswellRichard, “Interpreting Deceptive Advertising,”Boston University Law Review, vol. 65, no. 4, July 1985), pp. 658–732).
9.
Cliffdale Associates, Inc., et al., v. FTC, 103 FTC 110, 174–184 (1984).
10.
DahringerLee D., and JohnsonDenise R., “The Federal Trade Commission Redefinition of Deception and Public Policy Implications: Let the Buyer Beware,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, vol. 18, iss. 2, Winter 1984, pp. 326–42.
11.
DouglasGeorge W., and BaileyPatricia P., “Does the New FTC Deception Policy Fill the Bill?”Advertising Age, February 13, 1984, pp. 27–28.
12.
DugasChristine and DwyerPaula, “Deceptive Ads: The FTC's Laissez-Faire Approach is Backfiring,”Business Week, December 2, 1985, pp. 136, 140.
FordGary T. and CalfeeJohn E., “Recent Developments in FTC Policy on Deception,”Journal of Marketing, vol. 50, July 1986, pp. 82–103.
15.
FraserAlexander, “The FTC Enforcement Against Deceptive Advertising,”The 1985 Survey of American Law.
16.
FTC (1983), “Policy Statement on Deception,”45 ATRR 689 (October 27).
17.
FTC Authorization Act of 1983 HR Rep. No. 156, 98th Cong., 1st sess., p. 5 (1983).
18.
FTC News, March 26, 1984.
19.
FTC Review (1977–84), “A Report Prepared by a Member of the Federal Trade Commission Together with Comments from Other Members of the Commission for the use of the Sub-Committee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives,” September 1984.
20.
FTC Statement of Purpose, Labeling and Advertising of Home Insulation, 44 Fed. Reg. 50218–50222 (1979).
21.
GardnerDavid M., “Deception in Advertising: A Conceptual Approach,”Journal of Marketing, vol. 39, no. 1, January 1975, pp. 40–46.
22.
Harris, “Will the FTC Finally Wake Up?” Sales and Marketing Management, January 1988, pp. 57–60.
23.
KellerBruce, “Private Regulation of Advertising under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act,”The 1985 Annual Review of American Law.
24.
KinnearThomas C. and RootAnn R., “The FTC and Deceptive Advertising: Are Consumers Being Adequately Protected?”Harvard Public Policy Review, Fall 1988 vol. 7.
25.
Massachusetts Board of Registration in Optometry, FTC Dkt. 9195 (July 1986).
26.
MillerJames C.III, “The FTC and Voluntary Standards: Maximizing the Net Benefits of Self-Regulation,”Cato Journal, vol. 4, iss. 3, Winter 1985, pp. 897–903.
27.
PrestonIvan L., “A Review of the Literature on Advertising Regulation, 1983–1987,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising 1987, vol. 10, nos. 1 & 2, pp. 297–324.
Solar Age Industries, Inc., FTC File No. 842 3192 November 1986.
30.
Southwest Sunsites, Inc., et al. v. FTC, BNA ATRR No. 1260 (April 10, 1986) 633.
31.
SullivanE. Thomas, and MarksBrian A., “The FTC's Deceptive Advertising Policy: A Legal and Economic Analysis,”Oregon Law Review, 1986, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 593–635.
32.
Thompson Medical Co., Inc. v. FTC, BNA ATRR No. 1268 dune 5, 1986), 979.
