Not until the dimensionality of comparative advertising is identified, empirically examined, and incorporated into clear policy statements, can the FTC's goal of a better-informed consumer be realized. This paper examines the multi-dimensional nature of comparative advertising, raises questions, and offers suggestions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsBill (1982), “Comparative Ads Are Getting More Popular, Harder Hitting,”Wall Street Journal (March 11), 25.
2.
Advertising Age (1975), “Comparative Ads Ineffective: O & M Study” (Oct. 13), 16.
3.
Advertising Age (1977), “Westen: Comparative Ads Spur Flow of Facts” (Nov. 14), 6.
4.
Advertising Age (1980), “Some Comparative Ads Work, O & M Concedes” (Nov. 3), 6.
5.
Advertising Age (1982), “Pfizer Called on FDA's Carpet,” 53 (Sept. 13) 12.
6.
BelchGeorge E. (1981), “An Examination of Comparative and Noncomparative Television Commercials: The Effects of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance,”Journal of Marketing Research18 (Aug.), 333–49.
7.
BoddewynJ. J. and MartonKatherin (1978), Comparison Advertising: A Worldwide Study, New York: Hastings House Publishers.
8.
Broadcasting (1974a), “NBC Puts on Paper Its Rules For Comparative Ads” (Feb. 4), 40–41.
9.
Broadcasting (1974b), “Code Review Board Adds More Teeth to TV Rules for Comparison Ads” (Oct. 7), 61.
10.
Broadcasting (1976), “Comparative Ads In Center Ring at AAAA Meeting” (May 17), 42–43.
11.
ChevinsAnthony C. (1975), “A Case for Comparative Advertising,”Journal of Advertising4 (Spring) 32–33.
12.
DiamondSidney (1978), “Beware of Naming the Competitor,”Advertising Age (Oct. 23), 66.
13.
Dun's Review (1977), “Battle Over Comparative Ads” 110 (Nov.), 60–62.
14.
EngelJames F. and BlackwellRoger D. (1982), Consumer Behavior, Fourth Edition, Chicago: The Dryden Press.
15.
EtgarMichael and GoodwinStephen A. (1982), “One-Sided versus Two-Sided Comparative Message Appeals for New Brand Introductions,”Journal of Consumer Research8 (March), 460–65.
16.
Federal Register (1979), “Comparative Advertising: Issuance of a Policy Statement” 4, No. 157 (August 13) 47328–29.
17.
GigesNancy (1976), “New NAD Concern: Do Claims Imply Too Much?”Advertising Age (Aug. 16) 1, 65.
18.
GigesNancy (1980), “Comparative Ads Better Than …?,”Advertising Age (Sept. 22), 59–61.
19.
GoldenLinda (1976), “Consumer Reactions to Comparative Advertising,”Advances in Consumer Research3, 63–67.
20.
GigesNancy (1979), “Consumer Reactions to Explicit Comparisons in Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing Research16 (Nov.) 517–32.
21.
GoodwinStephen and EtgarMichael (1980), “An Experimental Investigation of Comparative Advertising: Impact of Message Appeal, Information Load, and Utility of Product Class,”Journal of Marketing Research17 (May) 187–202.
22.
JacobyJacob, SpellerDonald E., and KohnCarol A. (1974), “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load,”Journal of Marketing Research11 (Feb.) 63–69.
23.
JacksonDonald W. Jr., BrownStephen W., and HarmonRobert R. (1979), “Comparative Magazine Advertisements,”Journal of Advertising Research19 (Dec.), 21–26.
24.
JainSubhash C. and HacklemanEdwin C. (1978), “How Effective is Comparison Advertising for Stimulating Brand Recall?”Journal of Advertising (Summer), 20–25.
25.
KenaleDennis (1982), “Tylenol, the Painkiller, Gives Rivals Headache in Stores and in Court,”Wall Street Journal (Sept. 2), p. 10.
26.
KershawAndrew G. and TannenbaumStanley I. (1976), “For and Against Comparative Advertising, Advertising Age (July 5), 25–29.
27.
KrakowieckiMarie (1977), “What Else is Going Up? Ad Liability Insurance Cost,”Advertising Age (Aug. 15), 32–35.
28.
LevinePhilip (1976), “Commercials That Name Competing Brands,”Journal of Advertising Research16 (Dec.), 7–14.
29.
LevySidney J. (1983), “How Comparative IS Comparative Advertising?” in Advances in Consumer Research, BagozziRichard P. and TyboutAlice M., eds. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, 381–82.
30.
MazisMichael B. (1976), “A Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Comparative Advertising,” Working paper, College of Business Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville.
31.
McDougallGordon H. G. (1977), “Comparative Advertising: Consumer Issues and Attitudes,” in Contemporary Marketing Thought, GreenbergB. A. and BelengerD. M., eds. Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association, 286–91.
32.
McDougallGordon H. G. (1978), “Comparative Advertising: The Effect of Claim Type and Brand Loyalty,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising 1978, LeighJ. and MartinC. R. eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 39–52.
33.
MornerAimee (1978), “It Pays to Knock Your Competitor,”Fortune (Feb. 13), 104–11.
34.
PrasadV. Kanti (1976), “Communications—Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising: A Laboratory Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research3 (May), 128–37.
35.
PrideWilliam M., LambCharles W., and PletcherBarbara A. (1977), “Are Comparative Advertisements More Informative for Owners of the Mentioned Competing Brand Than for Nonowners?” in Contemporary Marketing Thought, GreenbergB. A. and BellengerD.N., eds. Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association, 298–301.
36.
PrideWilliam M., (1979), “The Informativeness of Comparative Advertisements: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Advertising (Spring) 29–35, 48.
37.
SawyerHoward G. (1976), “Boo To The ‘One Book Buy,’ Ads for Competition, Industrial Marketing (Nov.), 55.
38.
ScammonDebra (1978), “Comparative Advertising: A Reexamination of the Issues,”Journal of Consumer Affairs12 (Winter), 381–92.
39.
ShelugaDavid A. and JacobyJacob (1978), “Do Comparative Claims Encourage Comparison Shopping?” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising 1978, LeighJ. and MartinC. R., eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 23–38.
40.
ShimpTerence A. (1975), “Comparison Advertising in National Television Commercials: A Content Analysis with Specific Emphasis Devoted to the Issue of Incomplete Comparative Assertions,” in Marketing: The Challenges and the Opportunities, MazzeEdward M., ed. Series 37, Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association, 504–8.
41.
ShimpTerence A. and DyerDavid C. (1978), “The Effects of Comparative Advertising Mediated by Marketing Position of Sponsoring Brand,”Journal of Advertising (Summer), 13–19.
42.
SwinyardWilliam R. (1981), “The Interaction Between Comparative Advertising and Copy Claim Variation,”Journal of Marketing Research18 (May), 175–86.
UlanoffStanley M. (1975), “Comparison Advertising: An Historical Retrospective,” working paper, Cambridge, Mass.: Marketing Science Institute (Feb.).
45.
WilkieWilliam and FarrisPaul (1974), “Comparison Advertising: Issues and Prospects,” working paper, Cambridge, Mass.: Marketing Science Institute (Aug.).
46.
WilkieWilliam (1975), “Comparison Advertising: Problems and Potentials,”Journal of Marketing39 (Oct.), 7–15.
47.
WilsonR. Dale (1976), “An Empirical Evaluation of Comparative Advertising Messages: Subjects’ Responses On Perceptual Dimensions,”Advances in Consumer Research3, 53–57.
48.
WilsonR. Dale (1978), “Comparative Advertising: Some Current Considerations for Managerial Planning and Strategy,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising 1978, LeighJ. and MartinC. R., eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 5–22.
