It is imperative that businessmen understand the law concerning consumer product safety warnings if they are to minimize their losses in product liability suits; yet the legal issues in this area are often vague and complex. This paper will attempt to clarify these issues by providing a comprehensive review of the statutory and common law requirements concerning safety warnings. In addition, both the existing and the needed empirical work which could aid businessmen in complying with the common law will be delineated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Optical Co. vs. Weiderhamer (1980) 404 N.E. 2d 606 (Ind.).
2.
Atkins vs. Blow Knox Foundry (1980) 483 F. Supp. 1201 (Penn.).
3.
BergerNathalie (1982), “Products Liability—Strict Liability in Tort—Strict Liability Applicable in Inadequate Warning Cases,”Seton Hall Law Review12, 639–53.
4.
Bituminous Casualty Corp. vs. Black & Decker Mfg. Co. (1974) 518 S.W. 2d 868 (Tex.).
Brochu vs. Ortho Pharmaceutical Co. (1981) 642 F. 2d 652 (1st cir.).
7.
Bryant vs. Technical Research (1981) 654 F. 2d 1337 (9th cir.).
8.
Code of Federal Regulations (1982), U.S. Government Printing Office.
9.
CohenJoel and SkrullThomas (1980), “Information Processing Issues Involved in the Communication and Retrieval of Cigarette Warning Information,” Working Paper for Center for Consumer Research, University of Florida.
10.
Collins vs. Ridge Tool Co. (1975) 520 F. 2d 591 (7th cir.).
11.
CollinsBelinda and LernerNeil (1982), “Assessment of Fire-Safety Symbols,”Human Factors24 (1), 75–84.
12.
Consumer Information Remedies, Federal Trade Commission Staff Report, June 1979.
13.
Crane vs. Sears Roebuck & Co. (1963) 32 Cal Rptr. 754.
14.
Curry vs. Louis Allis Co. (1981) 427 N.E. 2d 254 (Ill).
15.
DeSantis vs. Parker Feeders Inc. (1976) 547 F. 2d 357 (7th cir.).
Dorsey vs. Honda Motor Co. Ltd. (1981) 655 F. 2d 650 (5th cir.).
18.
Eyster vs. Borg-Wamer Corp. (1974) 206 S.E. 2d 668 (Geo).
19.
Federal Trade Commission Study conducted by ASI (1975), “Warning Message Within an Alka-Seltzer TV Commercial—Audience Reaction Test,” ASI, May.
20.
FMC Corporation (1980), Product Safety and Label System, 3d Edition, Santa Clara, CA.
21.
Ford Motor Co. vs. Nowak (1982) 638 S.W. 2d 582 (Tex.).
22.
Formella vs. Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1981) 300 N.W. 2d 356 (Mich.).
23.
Freund vs. Cellofilm Properties Inc. (1981) 432 A. 2d. 925 (N.J.).
24.
Griggs vs. Firestone Tire & Rubber Corp. (1975) 513 F. 2d 851 (8th cir.) cert. denied 423 U.S. 863.
25.
Guidry vs. Kem Manufacturing Co. (1982) 693 F. 2d 426 (5th cir.).
26.
HoustonMichael and RothschildMichael (1980), “Policy-Related Experiments on Information Revision: A Normative Model and Explication,”Journal of Marketing Research17, 432–50.
27.
International Harvester (1982) F.T.C. DKT. No. 9147.
28.
Jiminez vs. Dreis & Krump Mfg. (1982) 522 F. Supp. 301 (N.Y.).
29.
Kohlenberger Inc. vs. Tysons Food (1974) 510 S.W. 2d 555 (Ark.).
30.
Kozlowski vs. John 275 N.W. 2d 915 (Wis. 1979).
31.
Kysor Industrial Corp. vs. Frazier (1982) 642 P. 2d 908 (Colo.).
32.
LaBelle vs. McCauley Inc. Corp. (1981) 649 F. 2d 46 (1st cir.).
33.
LittleDavid (1977), “Product Liability—the Growing Uncertainty about Warnings.”Forum12 (Summer), 995–1011.
34.
Lopez vs. Aro (1979) 584 S.W. 2d 333 (Tex.).
35.
Love vs. Wolf (1964) 38 Cal. Rptr. 183.
36.
McKee vs. Moore (1982) 648 P. 2d 21 (Okla.).
37.
Moran vs. Faberĝe (1975) 332 A. 2d 11 (Md.).
38.
Neiss Data Highlights, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, 1977, 1980, 1982.
39.
NoelDix and PhillipsJerry (1981), Product Liability in a Nutshell, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minn.
40.
Phillips vs. Kimwood Machine (1974) 525 P. 2d 1033 (Ore.).
41.
Reed vs. Penwalt Corp. (1979) 591 P. 2d 478 (Wash.).
42.
Report on Consumer Health Warnings for Alcoholic Beverages and Related Issues (1979). Hearing before Subcommittee on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, 632.
43.
Restatement of Torts 2d (1965), American Law Institute.
44.
RileyMichael, CochranDavid, and BallardJohn (1982), “An Investigation into the Preferred Shapes for Warning Labels,”Human Factors24 (6), 737–42.
45.
Rost vs. C.F. & I. Steel Corp. (1980) 616 P. 2d 383 (Mont.).
