The effect of providing nutritional information in food advertisements is examined experimentally in this study. The results indicated that this information only affected the early stages of processing. An econometric model indicated that nutritional knowledge and product class characteristics affected different stages of the information acquisition process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJohn R. (1976), Language, Memory, and Thought.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
AndersonJohn R. (1983), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory,”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–95.
3.
AsamEdward H., and BucklinLouis P. (1973), “Nutritional Labeling for Canned Goods: A Study of Consumer Response,”Journal of Marketing, 37, 32–37.
4.
BettmanJames R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
BrucksMerrie, and MitchellAndrew A. (1981), “Knowledge Structures, Production Systems, and Decision Strategies,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 8, MonroeKent, ed. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.
6.
CohenJacob (1977), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.New York: Academic Press.
7.
CollinsAllen M., and LoftusElizabeth F. (1975), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,”Psychological Review, 82, 407–28.
8.
CraikFergus I. M., and TulvingEndel (1975), “Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–94.
9.
DalyPatricia A. (1976), “The Response of Consumers to Nutrition Labeling,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 10, 170–78.
10.
Federal Trade Commission (1974), “Food Advertising: Proposed Trade Regulation Rule and Staff Statement,”Federal Register, 39, 39842–62.
11.
GallayRalph (1979), “Food Preference as a Function of Nutrition, Price, and Perceived Taste,” in 1979 Educators’ Conference Proceedings, BeckwithNeil, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
12.
GreenwaldAnthony G. (1975), “Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis,”Psychological Bulletin, 32, 1–19.
13.
GreenwaldAnthony G., and LeavittClark (1984), “Cognitive Theory and Audience Involvement,” in Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects, AlwittLinda and MitchellAndrew, eds. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
JacobyJacob, ChestnutRobert W., and SilbermanWilliam (1977), “Consumer Use and Comprehension of Nutrition Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 119–28.
15.
McGuireWilliam J. (1976), “Some Internal Psychological Factors Influencing Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 302–19.
16.
MitchellAndrew A. (1978), “An Information Processing View of Consumer Behavior,” in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, JainS.C., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
17.
MitchellAndrew A. (1979), “Cognitive Structures and Cognitive Processes.” Paper presented at American Psychological Association Convention in New York.
18.
MitchellAndrew A. (1982), “Models of Memory: Implications for Measuring Knowledge Structures,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. IX, MitchellAndrew, ed. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.
19.
MitchellAndrew A. (1983), “Cognitive Processes Initiated by Exposure to Advertising,” in Information Processing Research in Advertising, HarrisRichard, ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
OlsonJerry C. (1978), “Theories of Information Encoding and Storage: Implications for Consumer Research,” in The Effect of Information on Consumer and Market Behavior, MitchellAndrew, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 49–60.
21.
OlsonJerry C., and MuderrisogluAydin (1979), “The Reliability of Responses Obtained by Free Elicitation: Implications for Measuring Attribute Salience and Memory Structure,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 6, WilkieWilliam, ed. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, 269–75.
22.
OlsonJerry C., and SimsLaura S. (1980), “Consumers’ Nutrition Knowledge: An Information Processing Perspective.” Working Paper, College of Business Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
23.
Response Analysis Corporation (1975), “Summary Report. A Survey of Consumer Responses to Nutritional Claims,”Princeton, N.J.: Response Analysis Corporation.
24.
Response Analysis Corporation (1976), “A Survey of Consumer Responses to Nutrition Claims. A Commentary of Findings Presented in the Response Analysis Corporation Summary Report,”Princeton, N.J.: Response Analysis Corporation.
25.
RudellFredrica (1979), Consumer Food Selection and Nutrition Information, New York, N.Y.: Praeger Publishers.
26.
SawyerAlan G., and BallA. Dwayne (1981), “Statistical Power and Effect Size in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 275–90.
27.
ScammonDebra L. (1977), ‘“Information Load’ and Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 148–55.
28.
SharmaSubhash, DurandRichard M., and Gur-ArieObed (1981), “Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 291–300.
29.
White House Conference on Food, Nutrition, and Health (1968), “Final Report 1,”Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
WinerB. J. (1971), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, New York: McGraw-Hill Incorporated, p. 399.
31.
WrightPeter L., and RipPeter D. (1980), “Product Class Advertising Effects on First-Time Buyers’ Decision Strategies,”Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 176–88.
