Product liability is a growing threat to business. This paper argues that marketers have a substantial role to play in assisting in the corporate defense. A model of jury decision making is developed and a review of relevant literature is provided. Finally, potential areas in which marketers can aid corporate counsel in product liability defense are delineated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. Stacy (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Association of Trial Lawyers (1981), “Products Liability Payments up 68% in 4 Years,”Trial Bar Update, Feb.-March, 5.
3.
BettinghausErwin P. (1973), Persuasive Communication.New York: Rinehart and Winston.
4.
BroederD. W. (1965), “Occupational Expertise and Bias as Affecting Juror Behavior: A Preliminary Look,”New York University Law Review40, 1079–100.
5.
Business Week (1981), “More Punitive Damage Awards,” Jan. 12, 86.
6.
DeJongWilliam, MorrisWilliam N., and HastorfAlbert H. (1976), “Effect of an Escaped Accomplice on the Punishment Assigned to a Criminal Defendant,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology3, 192–98.
7.
DeLozierM. Wayne (1976), The Marketing Communications Process.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
8.
DionKaren K. (1972), “Physical Attractiveness and Evaulation of Children's Transgression,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology24, 207–13.
9.
EfranMichael G. (1974), “The Effect of the Physical Appearance on the Judgment of Guilt, Interpersonal Attraction, and Severity of Recommended Punishment in a Simulated Jury Task,”Journal of Research in Personality8, 45–54.
10.
EricksonBonnie, Allen LindE., JohnsonBruce C., and O'BarrWilliam (1978), “Speech Style and Impression Formation in a Court Setting: The Effects of ‘Powerful’ and ‘Powerless’ Speech,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology14, 266–79.
11.
FontesNorman E., and BundensR. (1980), “Persuasion during the Trial Process,” in Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research, RoloffM. E., and MillerG. R., eds. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
12.
FrantzAlfred (1977), “The Product Liability Crisis,”Credit and Financial Management38(Oct.), 10–11.
13.
GarciaLuis T., and GriffittWilliam (1978), “Impact of Testimonial Evidence as a Function of Witness Characteristics,”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society11, 37–40.
14.
GottschalkEarl C. (1981), “While More Firms Try Jury Consultants, Debate Grows Over How Much They Help,”Wall Street Journal, April 3.
Greeman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963), 59 Cal. 2d 57, 27 Cal. Rpt. 697, 377 p. 2d, 897.
17.
GreenDavid M., and SwetsJohn A. (1966), Signal Detection Theory and Psycho-physics.New York: Wiley.
18.
Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1978), Superior Court, Santa Ana, Cal., Feb. 6.
19.
HawkinsCharles (1962), “Interaction Rates of Jurors Aligned in Factions,”American Sociological Review27, 689–91.
20.
HeadHugh G. (1980), “Arguing Damages to the Jury,”Trial, Feb.
21.
HemsleyGordon D., and DoobAnthony N. (1978), “The Effect of Looking Behavior on Perceptions of Communicator's Credibility,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology8, 136–44.
22.
HolbrookMorris B. (1978), “Beyond Attitude Structure: Toward the Informational Determinants of Attitudes,”Journal of Marketing Research15, 545–56.
23.
HovlandCarl I., HarveyO. J., and SherifMuzafer (1957), “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Reaction to Communication and Attitude Change,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology55, 244–52.
24.
HuppertzJohn W., ArensonSidney J., and EvansRichard H. (1978), “An Application of Equity Theory to Buyer-Seller Exchange Situations,”Journal of Marketing Research15, 250–60.
25.
Interagency Task Force on Product Liability (1977), Final Report, I-1, Nov. 1.
26.
JonesEdward E., and GerardHarold B. (1967), Foundations of Social Psychology.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
27.
Jury Verdict Research, Inc. (1964–1969), Personal Injury Valuation Handbook, vols. 5–8.
28.
KalvenHarryJr. (1958), “The Jury, the Law, and the Personal Injury Damage Award,”Ohio State Law Journal10, 158–78.
29.
KalvenHarryJr., and ZeiselHans (1966), The American Jury.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
KaplanMartin F., and KemmerickGwen (1974), “Juror Judgment as Information Integration: Combining Evidential and Nonevidential Information,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology30, 493–99.
31.
KellyJ. Patrick, and SolomonPaul J. (1975), “Humor in Television Advertising,”Journal of Advertising4, 31–35.
32.
KuklaRichard A., and KesslerJoan B. (1973), “Is Justice Really Blind? The Influence of Physical Attractiveness on Decisions of Simulated Jurors,” paper presented at the national meetings of the Speech Communication Association, New York, Nov.
33.
LarsonErik (1980), “For Companies with Image Problem, Hiring Top Talent Can Take Ingenuity,”Wall Street Journal, Oct. 17.
34.
LawlerEdward E. (1968), “Equity Theory as a Predictor of Productivity and Work Quality,”Psychological Bulletin70, 596–610.
35.
LawsonRobert G. (1968), “Order of Presentation as a Factor in Jury Persuasion,”Kentucky Law Journal56, 523–55.
36.
LawsonRobert G. (1969), “Relative Effects of One-Sided and Two-Sided Communications in Courtroom Persuasion,”Journal of General Psychology82, 3–16.
37.
LevyRobert, and LevensonMark (1979), “A Record Year for Recalls,”Dunns Review113, 28–34.
38.
McGuireWilliam J., and PapageorgisDemetrios (1962), “Effectiveness of Forewarning in Developing Resistance to Persuasion,”Public Opinion Quarterly26, 24–34.
39.
MorrillA. E. (1972), Trial Diplomacy.Chicago: Court Practice Institute.
40.
MowenJohn C., and EllisH. W. (1980), “Product Liability: Issues in Corporate Communications to Consumers and Jurors,” in Midwest Conference Transactions, Thirty-fifth Conference of the American Society of Quality Control, Tulsa.
41.
MowenJohn C., and EllisH. W. (1982), “Marketing Research in the Courtroom: The Impact of Conducting a Product Recall on Mock Jury Damage Awards,” Working Paper no. 82–19, Oklahoma State University, College of Business.
42.
MowenJohn C., and LinderDarwyn (1979), “Discretionary Aspects of Jury Decision Making,” in The Social Psychology of Discretionary Law, AbtL. D., and StuartI. R., eds. New York: Von Nostrand Reinhold Company, 219–39.
43.
NisbettRichard, and RossLee (1980), Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
PressAric, and FooteDonna (1981), “Trials by Trial Jury,”Newsweek, March 9, 84.
46.
Restatement [Second) of Torts, Section 402A (1)(A).
47.
ReyesRobert M., ThompsonWilliam C., and BowerGordon H. (1980), “Judgmental Biases Resulting from Differing Availabilities of Arguments,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39, 2–12.
48.
RobinsonMark, and KaneGerald (1979), “Punitive Damages in the Products Case,”Trial, Jan., 34.
49.
RogersRonald W., and Ronald MewbornC. (1976), “Fear Appeals and Attitude Change: Effects of a Threat's Noxiousness, Probability of Occurrence, and the Efficacy of Coping Responses,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology34, 54–61.
50.
RoseArnold M., and PrellArthur E. (1955), “Does the Punishment Fit the Crime? A Study in Social Valuation,”American Journal of Sociology61, 247–59.
51.
SilversteinL. (1965), Defense of the Poor in Criminal Cases in American State Courts.Chicago: American Bar Foundation.
52.
SimonRita J. (1980), The Jury: Its Role in American Society.Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
53.
SimonRita J., and MahanLinda (1971), “Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the Classroom,”Law and Society Review, Feb., 319–30.
54.
SimonsHerbert, BerkowitzNancy N., and John MoyerR. (1970), “Similarity, Credibility, and Attitude Change: A Review and Theory,”Psychological Bulletin73, 1–16.
55.
StephanCookie, and TullyJ. C. (1973), “The Influence of Physical Attractiveness of a Plaintiff on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors,” paper read at the meetings of the North Central Sociological Association, Cincinnati.
56.
SternthalBrian, and Samuel CraigC. (1973), “Humor in Advertising,”Journal of Marketing37, 12–18.
57.
SternthalBrian, (1974), “Fear Appeals: Revisited and Revised,”Journal of Consumer Research1.
58.
SternthalBrian, DholakiaRuby, and LeavittClark (1978), “The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response,”Journal of Consumer Research4, 252–60.
59.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1973), “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,”Cognitive Psychology5, 207–32.
60.
TverskyAmos, (1974), “ Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,”Science185, 1124–31.
61.
WalsterElaine, WalsterG. W., and TraupmannJane (1978), “Equity and Premarital Sex,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36, 82–92.
62.
WeissWalter (1960), “Emotional Arousal and Attitude Change,”Psychological Reports6, 267–80.
63.
WeldH. P., and RoffMerrill (1938), “A Study of the Formation of Opinion Based upon Legal Evidence,”American Journal of Psychology51, 609–28.
