Cross-cultural comparisons can prove helpful for pinpointing factors which underlie efficient energy use. This study examines differences in the attitudes of Swedes, Canadians, and Americans about energy conservation, as a vehicle for evaluating the energy policies of these nations. Although they are efficient energy users, the heavily regulated Swedes possess weaker perceptions of personal involvement and effectiveness with regard to their energy problems. Canadians seem to have a more realistic understanding of the energy situation, and are more sensitive to the economic rationale for conservation, possibly as a result of their government's conservation promotion campaigns. Implications of the findings for U.S. energy policy are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenChris T. (1979), “Marketing Expertise and the Resolution of Resource Limitation Problems: The Case of Energy Conservation,” in Public Policy Issues in Marketing, vol. 1, FreyCynthia J., KinnearThomas C., and ReeceBonnie B., eds. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research, 131–45.
2.
AllenChris T. (1982), “Self-Perception Based Strategies for Stimulating Energy Conservation,”Journal of Consumer Research, in press.
3.
AllenChris T., and DillonWilliam R. (1979), “On Receptivity to Information Furnished by the Public Policymaker: The Case of Energy,” in 1979 Educators’ Proceedings, BeckwithNeil, HoustonMichael, MittelstaedtRobert, MonroeKent B., and WardScott, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 550–56.
4.
AndreasenAlan R., and ManningJean M. (1980), “Conducting Cross-National Consumer Policy Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 7, OlsonJ., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 77–82.
5.
BoffeyPhillip M. (1977), “How the Swedes Live Well While Consuming Less Energy,”Science196(May), 856.
6.
BoorMyron (1976), “Relationship of Internal-External Control and National Suicide Rates,”Journal of Social Psychology100(Oct.), 143–44.
7.
DarmstadterJoel, DunkerlyJoy, and AltermanJack (1977), How Industrial Societies Use Energy: A Comparative Analysis.Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
DunkerlyJoy, ed. (1978), International Comparisons of Energy Consumption.Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, Inc.
9.
Energy, Mines and Resources Canada (1976), An Energy Strategy for Canada.Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
10.
GoodWalter S. (1979), “Canadian Attitudes toward Energy Conservation: Implications for Public Policymakers,” in Public Policy Issues in Marketing, vol. 1, FreyCynthia J., KinnearThomas C., and ReeceBonnie B., eds. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research, 146–59.
11.
HansenRobert A., and RobinsonLarry M. (1980), “Testing the Effectiveness of Alternative Foot-in-the Door Manipulations,”Journal of Marketing Research17(Aug.), 359–64.
12.
HenionKarl E. (1976), Ecological Marketing.Columbus, Ohio: Grid, Inc.
13.
HuttonR. Bruce (1979), “Overview of the Energy Crisis and Consumer Conservation, Current Research and Action Programs, Workshop,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 6, WilkieW., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 11–14.
14.
HuttonR. Bruce, and McNeillDennis L. (1980), “Research Issues, Empirical Findings, and Public Policy Implications for Energy Labeling,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 7, OlsonJ., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 283–89.
15.
KeoughJames (1978), “How Sweden Saves So Much Energy,”Sierra63(July/Aug.), 8–11.
16.
McDougallG. H. G., and KellerG. (1980), “The Energy Issue: Canadian and American Consumer Attitudes and Behavior (1973–1979),” Research Paper Series, No. 0180, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario.
17.
McGinniesElliott, NordholmLena A., WardCharles D., and BlanthumnavinDuangduen L. (1974), “Sex and Cultural Differences in Perceived Locus of Control among Students in Five Countries,”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology42(June), 451–55.
18.
MilsteinJeffrey S. (1977), “Attitudes, Knowledge and Behavior of American Consumers regarding Energy Conservation with Some Implications for Governmental Action,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 4, PerreaultW., ed. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, 315–21.
19.
New York Times (1979), “Utilities See Oil-Goal Obstacles,” July 18, D1.
20.
NunnallyJohn C. (1967), Psychometric Theory.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
21.
RichmanAl (1979), “The Polls: Public Attitudes toward the Energy Crisis,”Public Opinion Quarterly43(Winter), 576–85.
22.
SchipperLee, and LichtenbergAllan J. (1976), “Efficient Energy Use and Well-Being: The Swedish Example,”Science194(Dec.), 1001–13.
23.
ScottCarol A. (1977), “Modifying Socially-Conscious Behavior: The Foot-in-the-Door Technique,”Journal of Consumer Research4(Dec), 156–64.
24.
ThorelliHans B., and EngledowJack L. (1980), “Information Seekers and Information Systems: A Policy Perspective,”Journal of Marketing44(Spring), 9–23.
25.
Van VactorSamuel (1978), “Energy Conservation in the OECD: Progress and Results,” in International Comparisons of Energy Consumption, DunkerlyJ., ed. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, Inc., 165–97.
26.
WebsterFrederick E. (1975), “Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer,”Journal of Consumer Research2(Dec), 188–96.
27.
WinerB. J. (1971), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
28.
YankelovichDaniel (1974), “How Opinion Polls Differ from Social Indicators,” in Social Indicators and Marketing, ClewettR., and OlsonJ., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 54–66.
