This study examines the use of communications appeals to influence consumers to comply with conservation requests. Four compliance-gaining techniques from the social psychology literature are investigated for their efficacy in motivating user acceptance of a gasoline conservation device. The authors conclude that future research should focus on the interactions between the various compliance-gaining techniques and the specific compliance situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenC. T. (1979), “Marketing Expertise and the Resolution of Resource Limitation Problems: The Case of Energy Conservation,” in Public Policy Issues in Marketing, FreyCynthia J., KinnearThomas C., and ReeceBonnie B., eds. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research.
2.
AndermanD., and BerkowitzL. (1971), “Observational Set, Empathy, and Helping,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology14, 141–48.
3.
AronsonE., and MetteeD. (1968), “Dishonest Behavior as a Function of Differential Levels of Induced Self-Esteem,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology9, 121–27.
4.
BernD. J. (1972), “Self-Perception Theory,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press.
5.
CannA., ShermanS. J., and ElkesR. (1975), “Effects of Initial Request Size and Timing of a Second Request on Compliance: The Foot-in-the-Door and Door-in-the-Face,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32, 774–82.
6.
CialdiniR. B., BassetR., CacioppoF. T., and MillerJ. A. (1978), “Low-Ball Procedure for Producing Compliance: Commitment Then Cost,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36(5), 470–76.
7.
CraigC. S., and McCannJ. M. (1978), “Assessing Communication Effects on Energy Conservation,”Journal of Consumer Research (Sept.), 82–88.
8.
“Creating Energy Choices for the Future,” ERDA-48, vols. 1 and 2, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration.
9.
FreedmanJ. L., and FraserS. C. (1966), “Compliance without Pressure: The Foot-in-the-Door Technique,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology4, 195–202.
10.
HansenR. A., and RobinsonL. M. (1980), “Testing the Effectiveness of Alternative Foot-in-the-Door Manipulations,”Journal of Marketing Research (Aug.), 359–64.
11.
HarrisM. B. (1972), “The Effects of Performing One Altruistic Act on the Likelihood of Performing Another,”Journal of Social Psychology88, 65–73.
12.
HuttonR. B. (1979), “Overview of ‘The Energy Crisis and Consumer Conservation: Current Research and Action Programs’ Workshop,’” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 6, WilkieWilliam L., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 12–14.
13.
HuttonR. B., and McNeillD. C. (1978), “Research Issues, Empirical Findings, and Public Policy Implications for Energy Labeling,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 7, OlsenJ., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 283–89.
14.
HuttonR. B., McNeillD. C., and WilkieW. L. (1979), “Some Issues in Designing Consumer Information Studies Public Policy,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 6, WilkieWilliam L., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 131–37.
15.
KelleyH. (1967), “Attribution in Social Psychology,”Nebraska Symposium on Motivation15, 192–238.
16.
KrautR. W. (1973), “Effects of Social Labeling on Giving to Charity,”Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology9, 551–62.
17.
McClellandD. C., and CenterR. C. (1979), “Psychological Research on Energy Conservation: Context, Approaches, Methods,” in Advances in Environmental Psychology, vol. 3–Energy Conservation: Psychological Perspectives, BausA., and SingerJ. E., eds. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
McDougallG. H., and Brent RitchieJ. R. (1978), “Consumer Energy Conservation: A Framework for Policy Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 7, OlsenJ., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 272–76.
19.
MillerR. C., BrickmanP., and BolenD. (1975), “Attribution versus Persuasion as a Means for Modifying Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, 430–41.
20.
MillerR. L., and SulsJ. (1977), “Helping, Self-Attribution, and the Size of an Initial Request,”Journal of Social Psychology103, 203–7.
21.
MowenJ. C., and CialdiniR. B. (1980), “On Implementing the Door-in-the-Face Compliance Technique in a Business Context,”Journal of Marketing Research (May), 253–58.
22.
PlinerP., HartH., KohlJ., and SariD. (1974), “Compliance without Pressure: Some Further Data on the Foot-in-the-DoorTechnique,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology10, 17–22.
23.
ReingenP. H. (1978), “On Inducing Compliance with Requests,”Journal of Consumer Research5(2), 96–102.
24.
ReingenP. H., and KernanJ. B. (1977), “Compliance with an Interview Request: A Foot-in-the-Door, Self-Perception Interpretation,”Journal of Marketing Research (Aug.), 365–69.
25.
RossM., InskoC. A., and RossH. S. (1971), “Self-Attribution ofAttitude,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology17, 292–97.
26.
ScottA., and TyboutA. M. (1977), “Extending the Self-Perception Explanation: The Effect of Cue Salience on Behavior,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 6, WilkieWilliam L., ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research, 50–54.
27.
ScottC. A. (1977), “Modifying Socially Conscious Behavior: The Foot-in-the-Door Technique,”Journal of Consumer Research4, 156–64.
28.
SeaverW. B., and PattersonA. (1976), “Decreasing Fuel-Oil Consumption through Feedback and Social Commendation,”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis9, 147–52.
29.
SteeleC. M. (1975), “Name Calling and Compliance,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, 361–69.
30.
SwinyardW. R., and RayM. L. (1979), “Effects of Praise and Small Requests on Receptivity to Direct Mail Appeals,”Journal of Social Psychology108, 177–84.
31.
WalkerJames W. (1980), “Voluntary Response to Energy Conservation Appeals,”Journal of Consumer Research7(1), 88–91.
32.
WebsterF. E.Jr. (1975), “Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer,”Journal of Consumer Research2(3), 188–96.
