This article deals with the overall relationship between product liability and market segmentation. The legal concepts of foreseeability and notice are related to market segmentation in the context of disadvantaged consumer segments. In addition, the role of marketing research in supporting or defending a liability allegation is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndreasenAlan R. (1975), The Disadvantaged Consumer.New York: The Free Press.
2.
BarryThomas E., and HarveyMichael G. (1974], “Marketing to Heterogeneous Black Consumers,”California Management Review2 (Winter), 50–57.
3.
BerryLeonard L. (1972), “The Low-Income Marketing System: An Overview,”Journal of Retailing48(Summer), 44–63.
4.
Dougherty v. Hooker Chemical Corp. (1976), 540 F.2d 174 (3rd Cir.).
5.
GoldmanArieh (1978), “Confined Shopping Behavior among Low Income Consumers: An Empirical Test,”Journal of Marketing Research15(Feb.), 11–19.
6.
GoodwinJohn F., and RovelstadJames V. (1976), “Rules of Evidence and the Marketing Expert: Analysis of an Empirical Study Used in Court,”American Business Law Journal14, 40–53.
7.
HarveyMichael G., and BarryThomas E. (1976), “Mass Media and Adolescent Minority Consumers: An Experiment in Effectiveness,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science4(Fall), 682–93.
8.
Hubbard-Hall Chemical Company v. Silverman (1965), 340 F.2d 402 (1st Cir.).
9.
Incollingo v. Ewing (1971), 282 A.2d 220.
10.
Jonescue v. Jewel Home Shopping Service (1973), 306 N.E.2d 312.
11.
Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co. (1945), 41 A.2d 850.
12.
MarmerRonald L. (1976), “Opinion Polls and the Law of Evidence,”Virginia Law Review62(Oct.), 1101–33.
13.
MorganFred W. (1979), “The Admissibility of Consumer Surveys as Legal Evidence,”Journal of Marketing43(Fall), 33–40.
14.
Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965), American Law Institute.
15.
SextonDonald E. (1971a), “Comparing the Cost of Food to Blacks and to Whites–A Survey,”Journal of Marketing35(July), 40–47.
16.
SextonDonald E. (1971b), “Do Blacks Pay More?”Journal of Marketing Research8(Nov.), 420–26.
17.
Smith v. E. R. Squibb and Sons (1976), 69 Mich. App. 372.
18.
Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc. (1962), 308 F.2d 79.
19.
StaffordJames E., CoxKeith K., and HigginbothamJames B. (1968), “Some Consumption Pattern Differences between Urban Whites and Negroes,”Social Science Quarterly44(Dec), 619–30.
20.
Sterling Drug v. Yarrow (1969), 408 F.2d 978.
21.
TrombettaWilliam L., and WilsonTimothy L. (1975), “Foreseeability of Misuse and Abnormal Use of Products by the Consumer,”Journal of Marketing39(July), 48–55.
22.
WallKelvin A. (1969), “Marketing to Low-Income Neighborhoods: A Systems Approach,”University of Washington Business Review12(Autumn), 18–25.
23.
Walton v. Sherwin-Williams Co. (1951), 191 F.2d 277 (8th Cir.).
24.
Weekes v. Michigan Chrome and Chemical Co. (1965), 352 F.2d 603 (6th Cir.).
