This research explores opportunities to (re)design financial information disclosures for electronic environments to increase their efficacy and improve consumer outcomes. Consumers increasingly interact with financial products and services using online or mobile technology, yet policies addressing electronic disclosures rarely recognize that consumers’ attention, information processing, and engagement differ in digital environments compared with the paper-based systems under which most disclosures were designed. To address this policy need, the authors call for research examining financial information provision in electronic environments relevant for disclosure policy. To facilitate this goal, the authors first develop an integrative conceptual framework for understanding consumer information processing in interactive electronic environments. The framework highlights how electronic devices and digitally enabled capabilities—such as dynamic interactivity, real-time information customization, and flexible delivery time and location—can affect consumer interactions with disclosed information and downstream outcomes. Second, the authors highlight three major, well-established challenges facing financial disclosures (limited attention and engagement, information complexity and overload, and consumer estimation and perceptual errors) and discuss how electronic information environments can exacerbate those challenges or serve to alleviate them. This leads to an actionable research agenda that motivates scholarship on electronic disclosure design and its impact on consumer well-being.
AdepuSushmaAdlerRachel F. (2016), “A Comparison of Performance and Preference on Mobile Devices vs. Desktop Computers,” in 2016 IEEE 7th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). IEEE,https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7777808.
2.
AguirreElizabethRoggeveenAnne L.GrewalDhruvWetzelsMartin (2016), “The Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Implications for New Media,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(2), 98–110.
3.
ArthurWinfredJr.KeiserNathanael L.HagenEllenDoverspikeDennis (2018a), “An Information-Processing-Based Conceptual Framework of the Effects of Unproctored Internet-Based Testing Devices on Scores on Employment-Related Assessments and Tests,” Human Performance, 31 (1), 1–32.
4.
ArthurWinfredJr.KeiserNathanael L.HagenEllenTraylorZach (2018b), “Unproctored Internet-Based Device-Type Effects on Test Scores: The Role of Working Memory,” Intelligence, 67, 67–75.
BakosYannisMarotta-WurglerFlorenciaTrossenDavid R. (2014), “Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts,” Journal of Legal Studies, 43 (1), 1–35.
7.
Bar-GillOrenBoardOliver (2012), “Product-Use Information and the Limits of Voluntary Disclosure,” American Law and Economics Review, 14 (1), 235–70.
8.
BenbasatIzakDexterAlbert S. (1985), “An Experimental Evaluation of Graphical and Color-Enhanced Information Presentation,” Management Science, 31 (11), 1348–64.
9.
Ben-ShaharOmriSchneiderCarl E. (2011), “The Failure of Mandated Disclosure,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 159, 647–749.
10.
Ben-ShaharOmriSchneiderCarl E. (2014), More Than You Wanted to Know: The Failure of Mandated Disclosure. Princeton University Press.
11.
BertrandMarianneMorseAdair (2011), “Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases, and Payday Borrowing,” Journal of Finance, 66 (6), 1865–93.
12.
BétrancourtMireilleBisseretAndré (1998), “Integrating Textual and Pictorial Information Via Pop-Up Windows: An Experimental Study,” Behaviour & Information Technology, 17 (5), 263–73.
13.
BettmanJames R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
14.
BlankespoorElizabethdeHaanEdMarinovicIván (2020), “Disclosure Processing Costs, Investors’ Information Choice, and Equity Market Outcomes: A Review,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70 (2-3), 101344.
15.
BlutMarkusWangCheng (2020), “Technology Readiness: A Meta-Analysis of Conceptualizations of the Construct and its Impact on Technology Usage,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (4), 649–69.
16.
BraselS. AdamGipsJames (2014), “Tablets, Touchscreens, and Touchpads: How Varying Touch Interfaces Trigger Psychological Ownership and Endowment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (2), 226–33.
17.
BraselS. AdamGipsJames (2015), “Interface Psychology: Touchscreens Change Attribute Importance, Decision Criteria, and Behavior in Online Choice,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18 (9), 534–8.
18.
BrookeJ.B.DuncanK.D. (1983), “A Comparison of Hierarchically Paged and Scrolling Displays for Fault Finding,” Ergonomics, 26 (5), 465–77.
19.
BrownTimGrantStephanie M.WinnAmanda M. (2020), “The Effect of Mobile Device Use and Headline Focus on Investor Judgments,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 83, 101100.
CarmanKatieChinAlyciaCookJonathanNashSteven B.SchollBrianZimmermanDavid (2023), Investor Testing Report on Registered Index-Linked Annuities,OIAD Working Paper 2023-01, https://www.sec.gov/files/rila-report-092023.pdf.
22.
CarrNicholas (2010), The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. Norton.
23.
CarrierL. MarkRosenLarry D.CheeverNancy A.LimAlex F. (2015), “Causes, Effects, and Practicalities of Everyday Multitasking,” Developmental Review, 35, 64–78.
24.
CasteloNoahBosMaarten W.LehmannDonald R. (2019), “Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (5), 809–25.
25.
CFPB (2016), Annual Report of the Academic Research Council. https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/201612_cfpb_ Annual_Report_Academic_Research_Council.pdf.
26.
CFPB (2019), “The Consumer Credit Card Market,” (August), https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_consumer-credit-card-market-report_2019.pdf.
27.
CFPB (2020), “Tech Sprint on Electronic Disclosures of Adverse Action Notices,” https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/innovation/cfpb-tech-sprints/electronic-disclosures-tech-sprint/.
CFPB (2024), “Executive Summary of the Personal Financial Data Rights Rule,” October 22, https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_executive-summary-of-the-personal-financial-rights-rule__2024-10.pdf.
ChenChih-MingLinYu-Ju (2016), “Effects of Different Text Display Types on Reading Comprehension, Sustained Attention and Cognitive Load in Mobile Reading Contexts,” Interactive Learning Environments, 24 (3), 553–71.
32.
ChenSherry Y.MacredieRobert (2010), “Web-Based Interaction: A Review of Three Important Human Factors,” International Journal of Information Management, 30 (5), 379–87.
33.
ChinAlyciaBeckettDustin H. (2021), “Don’t Watch Me Read: How Mere Presence and Mandatory Waiting Periods Affect Consumer Attention to Disclosures,” Behavioural Public Policy, 5 (2), 202–21.
34.
ChinAlyciaCarmanKatherineCraigAdamCookJonathan A.ZimmermanDavid B. (2026), “Turning Policy Implications into Policy Impact: Lessons from Behavioral Science in Financial Markets,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 123 (28), e2525990123.
35.
ChinAlyciaSchollBrianVanEppsEric M. (2026), “Jargon in Consumer Information: The Case of Mutual Fund Fees,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 45 (1), 18–32.
36.
ChinAlyciaWilliamsAlanna K. (2020), “Take-Up of Financial Education: Demographic Characteristics and Prior Knowledge,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39 (3), 319–33.
37.
ChinAlyciaZimmermanDavidJohnsonHeidiShuSuzanne B. (2022), “Decisions About Overdraft Coverage: Disclosure Design and Personal Finances,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28 (4), 746–74.
38.
ChungSorimKramerThomasWongElaine M. (2018), “Do Touch Interface Users Feel More Engaged? The Impact of Input Device Type on Online Shoppers’ Engagement, Affect, and Purchase Decisions,” Psychology & Marketing, 35 (11), 795–806.
39.
ClintonVirginia (2019), “Reading from Paper Compared to Screens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Research in Reading, 42 (2), 288–325.
DanielDavid B.WoodyWilliam Douglas (2013), “E-Textbooks at What Cost? Performance and Use of Electronic v. Print Texts,” Computers & Education, 62, 18–23.
42.
De HaanEvertKannanP.K.VerhoefPeter C.WieselThorsten (2018), “Device Switching in Online Purchasing: Examining the Strategic Contingencies,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (5), 1–19.
43.
De LangheBartPuntoniStefano (2016), “Productivity Metrics and Consumers’ Misunderstanding of Time Savings,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (3), 396–406.
44.
De La RosaWendyBechlerChristopher J.HershfieldHal E.RinoGwenHatchRyanChanChrisGiannellaEric (2024), “Improving Income Elicitation Methods to Increase Income Reporting: Evidence from Two Large-Scale Field Experiments Among Government Benefit Applicants,” working paper.
45.
DelgadoPabloVargasCristinaAckermanRakefetSalmerónLadislao (2018), “Don’t Throw Away Your Printed Books: A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Reading Media on Reading Comprehension,” Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38.
46.
DeStefanoDianaLeFevreJo-Anne (2007), “Cognitive Load in Hypertext Reading: A Review,” Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3), 1616–41.
47.
DillaWilliamJanvrinDiane J.RaschkeRobyn (2010), “Interactive Data Visualization: New Directions for Accounting Information Systems Research,” Journal of Information Systems, 24 (2), 1–37.
48.
DillonAndrew (1992), “Reading from Paper Versus Screens: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature,” Ergonomics, 35 (10), 1297–1326.
49.
DillonAndrewMcKnightCliffRichardsonJohn (1988), “Reading from Paper Versus Reading from Screen,” Computer Journal, 31 (5), 457–64.
50.
DurkinThomas A.ElliehausenGregory (2011), Truth in Lending: Theory, History, and a Way Forward. Oxford University Press.
51.
EdelmanDavid C.SingerMarc (2015), “Competing on Customer Journeys,” Harvard Business Review (November), https://hbr.org/2015/11/competing-on-customer-journeys.
FukayaTakgo Y.OnoSusumuMinakuchiMinouriNakashimaSeiyaHayashiMasakoAndoHiroshi (2011), “Reading Text on a Smart Phone: Scrolling vs. Paging: Toward Designing Effective Electronic Manuals,” 2011 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 59–63.
64.
FungArchonGrahamMaryWeilDavid (2007), Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge University Press.
65.
GibsonDominic J.TungAllieChenKatharineHoffmanMikkaCastanedaLisa (2025), “From Budgeting to Day Trading: A Content Analysis of Financial Advice on TikTok,” Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 36 (2), 315–24.
GrantStephanie M. (2020), “How Does Using a Mobile Device Change Investors’ Reactions to Firm Disclosures?” Journal of Accounting Research, 58 (3), 741–75.
69.
GreenThomas D.PereraRobert A.DanceLauryn A.MyersElizabeth A. (2010), “Impact of Presentation Mode on Recall of Written Text and Numerical Information: Hard Copy Versus Electronic,” North American Journal of Psychology, 12 (2), 233–42.
70.
HattulaJohannes D.HerzogWalterDharRavi (2023), “The Impact of Touchscreen Devices on Consumers’ Choice Confidence and Purchase Likelihood,” Marketing Letters, 34 (1), 35–53.
71.
HäublGeraldTriftsValerie (2000), “Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids,” Marketing Science, 19 (1), 4–21.
72.
HilcheyMatthew D.OsborneMatthewSomanDilip (2023), “Does the Visual Salience of Credit Card Features Affect Choice?” Behavioral Public Policy, 7, 291–308.
73.
HodgeFrankPronkMaarten (2006), “The Impact of Expertise and Investment Familiarity on Investors’ Use of Online Financial Report Information,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 21 (3), 267–92.
74.
HorriganJohn B. (2016), “Digital Readiness Gaps,” Pew Research Center (September 20), https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/09/20/digital-readiness-gaps/.
75.
HouJinghuiRashidJustinLeeKwan Min (2017), “Cognitive Map or Medium Materiality? Reading on Paper and Screen,” Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 84–94.
76.
HowardRay CharlesHardistyDavid J.SussmanAbigail B.LukasMarcel F. (2022), “Understanding and Neutralizing the Expense Prediction Bias: The Role of Accessibility, Typicality, and Skewness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 59 (2), 435–52.
JarvenpaaSirkka L.DicksonGary W. (1988), “Graphics and Managerial Decision Making: Research Based Guidelines,” Communications of the ACM, 31 (6), 764–74.
80.
JohnsonEric J.MeierStephanToubiaOlivier (2019), “What’s the Catch? Suspicion of Bank Motives and Sluggish Refinancing,” Review of Financial Studies, 32 (2), 467–95.
81.
JohnsonGarrett A.ShriverScott K.DuShaoyin (2020), “Consumer Privacy Choice in Online Advertising: Who Opts Out and at What Cost to Industry?” Marketing Science, 39 (1), 33–51.
82.
JohnsonHeidiLearyJesse (2017), “Policy Watch: Research Priorities on Disclosure at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36 (1), 184–91.
83.
KarlanDeanMcConnellMargaretMullainathanSendhilZinmanJonathan (2016), “Getting to the Top of Mind: How Reminders Increase Saving,” Management Science, 62 (12), 3393–411.
84.
KarlssonNiklasLoewensteinGeorgeSeppiDuane (2009), “The Ostrich Effect: Selective Attention to Information,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38, 95–115.
85.
KaufmannChristineWeberMartinHaisleyEmily (2013), “The Role of Experience Sampling and Graphical Displays on One's Investment Risk Appetite,” Management Science, 59 (2), 323–40.
86.
KerrMatthew A.SymonsSonya E. (2006), “Computerized Presentation of Text: Effects on Children’s Reading of Informational Material,” Reading and Writing, 19, 1–19.
87.
KimJaewonThomasPaulSankaranarayanayRameshGedeonyTomYoonHwan-Jin (2016), “Pagination Versus Scrolling in Mobile Web Search,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Association for Computing Machinery. ACM,751–60.
88.
KleringsIrmaWeinhandlAlexandra S.ThalerKylie J. (2015), “Information Overload in Healthcare: Too Much of a Good Thing?” Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 109 (4–5), 285–90.
89.
KongYirenSik SeoYoungZhaiLing (2018), “Comparison of Reading Performance on Screen and on Paper: A Meta-Analysis,” Computers & Education, 123, 138–49.
90.
KozupJohnTaylorCharles R.CapellaMichael L.KeesJeremy (2012), “Sound Disclosures: Assessing When a Disclosure Is Worthwhile,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31 (2), 313–22.
91.
LautermanTirzaAckermanRakefet (2014), “Overcoming Screen Inferiority in Learning and Calibration,” Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–63.
92.
LemonKatherine N.VerhoefPeter C. (2016), “Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 69–96.
93.
LiaoLiWangZhengweiXiangJiaYanHongjunYanJun (2021), “User Interface and Firsthand Experience in Retail Investing,” Review of Financial Studies, 34 (9), 4486–4523.
94.
LinJiun-Sheng ChrisHsiehPei-Ling (2007), “The Influence of Technology Readiness on Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions Toward Self-Service Technologies,” Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3), 1597–1615.
95.
LiuZiming (2005), “Reading Behavior in the Digital Environment: Changes in Reading Behavior over the Past Ten Years,” Journal of Documentation, 61 (6), 700–712.
96.
LoewensteinGeorgeCainDaylian M.SahSunita (2011), “The Limits of Transparency: Pitfalls and Potential of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest,” American Economic Review, 101 (3), 423–28.
LurieNicholas H. (2004), “Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments: The Role of Information Structure,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (4), 473–86.
101.
MaclnnisDeborah J.JaworskiBernard J. (1989), “Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (4), 1–23.
102.
MangenAnneVan der WeelAdriaan (2016), “The Evolution of Reading in the Age of Digitisation: An Integrative Framework for Reading Research,” Literacy, 50 (3), 116–24.
103.
MayesDaniel K.SimsValerie K.KoonceJefferson M. (2001), “Comprehension and Workload Differences for VDT and Paper-Based Reading,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28 (6), 367–78.
MonroeMary AnnChronisterMichelle (2015), “Journey Mapping the Customer Experience: A USA.gov Case Study,” Digital.gov (August 12), https://digital.gov/2015/08/12/journey-mapping-the-customer-experience-a-usa-gov-case-study/.
106.
MorrisonDavid L.DuncanKeith D. (1988), “The Effect of Scrolling, Hierarchically Paged Displays and Ability on Fault Diagnosis Performance,” Ergonomics, 31 (6), 889–904.
107.
MurrayKyle B.HäublGerald (2008), “Interactive Consumer Decision Aids,” in Handbook of Marketing Decision Models, WierengaBerend, ed. Springer, 55–77.
108.
National Survey of Mortgage Originations (2024), “Select Weighted Tabulations, 2013–2021,” NSMO Technical Document,https://www.fhfa.gov/data/nsmo.
109.
NicholsMark (2016), “Reading and Studying on the Screen: An Overview of Literature Towards Good Learning Design Practice,” Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 20 (1), 33–43.
110.
NoyesJan M.GarlandKate J. (2003), “VDT Versus Paper-Based Text: Reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31 (6), 411–23.
111.
NoyesJan M.GarlandKate J. (2008), “Computer vs. Paper-Based Tasks: Are They Equivalent?” Ergonomics, 51 (9), 1352–75.
112.
OphirEyalNassCliffordWagnerAnthony D. (2009), “Cognitive Control in Media Multitaskers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (37), 15583–87.
113.
ParasuramanA. (2000), “Technology Readiness Index (TRI) A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies,” Journal of Service Research, 2 (4), 307–20.
114.
PayneJohn W.BettmanJames R.JohnsonEric J. (1988), “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14 (3), 534–52.
115.
PayneJohn W.BettmanJames R.JohnsonEric J. (1993), The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press.
116.
PerryVanessa G.BlumenthalPamela M. (2012), “Understanding the Fine Print: The Need for Effective Testing of Mandatory Mortgage Loan Disclosures,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31 (2), 305–12.
117.
PiolatAnnieRousseyJean-YvesThuninOlivier (1997), “Effects of Screen Presentation on Text Reading and Revising,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47 (4), 565–89.
118.
PriceBobGreinerRussHäublGeraldFlattAlden (2006), “Automatic Construction of Personalized Customer Interfaces,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 250–57.
119.
ProapsAlexandra B.BlissJames P. (2014), “The Effects of Text Presentation Format on Reading Comprehension and Video Game Performance,” Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 41–47.
120.
RaptisDimitriosTseliosNikolaosKjeldskovJesperSkovMikael B. (2013), “Does Size Matter? Investigating the Impact of Mobile Phone Screen Size on Users’ Perceived Usability, Effectiveness and Efficiency,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 127–36.
121.
RegelmanRomanHayesDerekMorbeOlivierLingelJulieReshefMichal (2016), How Digitized Customer Journeys Can Help Banks Win Hearts, Minds, and Profits. Boston Consulting Group.
122.
ReyGünter DanielBeegeMaikNebelSteveWirzbergerMariaSchmittTobias H.SchneiderSascha (2019), “A Meta-Analysis of the Segmenting Effect,” Educational Psychology Review, 31, 389–419.
Rockinson-SzapkiwAmanda J.CourduffJenniferCarterKimberlyBennettDavid (2013), “Electronic Versus Traditional Print Textbooks: A Comparison Study on the Influence of University Students’ Learning,” Computers & Education, 63, 259–66.
125.
SabirAsrar AhmedAhmadIftikharAhmadHassanRafiqMuhammadKhanMuhammad AsgharNoreenNeelum (2023), “Consumer Acceptance and Adoption of AI Robo-Advisors in Fintech Industry,” Mathematics, 11, 1311.
126.
SalisburyLinda CourtZhaoMin (2020), “Active Choice Format and Minimum Payment Warnings in Credit Card Repayment Decisions,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39 (3), 284–304.
127.
SanchezChristopher A.BranaghanRussell J. (2011), “Turning to Learn: Screen Orientation and Reasoning with Small Devices,” Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (2), 793–97.
128.
SanchezChristopher A.GoolsbeeJames Z. (2010), “Character Size and Reading to Remember from Small Displays,” Computers & Education, 55 (3), 1056–62.
129.
SanchezChristopher A.WileyJennifer (2009), “To Scroll or Not to Scroll: Scrolling, Working Memory Capacity, and Comprehending Complex Texts,” Human Factors, 51 (5), 730–38.
130.
ShaftTeresa M.VesseyIris (2006), “The Role of Cognitive Fit in the Relationship Between Software Comprehension and Modification,” MIS Quarterly, 30 (1), 29–55.
131.
ShenHaoZhangMengKrishnaAradhna (2016), “Computer Interfaces and the ‘Direct-Touch’ Effect: Can iPads Increase the Choice of Hedonic Food?” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 745–58.
132.
ShiSavannah WeiKalyanamKirthi (2018), “Touchable Apps: Exploring the Usage of Touch Features and Their Impact on Engagement,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 44 (1), 43–59.
133.
ShuSuzanne B.ZeithammerRobertPayneJohn W. (2016), “Consumer Preferences for Annuity Attributes: Beyond Net Present Value,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (2), 240–62.
134.
SingerLauren M.AlexanderPatricia A. (2017), “Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal,” Review of Educational Research, 87 (6), 1007–41.
135.
SollJack B.KeeneyRalph L.LarrickRichard P. (2013), “Consumer Misunderstanding of Credit Card Use, Payments, and Debt: Causes and Solutions,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32 (1), 66–81.
136.
SpeierCheri (2006), “The Influence of Information Presentation Formats on Complex Task Decision-Making Performance,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (11), 1115–31.
137.
SpillerStephen A.ReinholtzNicholasMaglioSam J. (2019), “Judgments Based on Stocks and Flows: Different Presentations of the Same Data Can Lead to Opposing Inferences,” Management Science, 66 (5), 2213–31.
138.
StarkDebra PogrundChoplinJessica M.LeBoeufMark A. (2012), “Ineffective in Any Form: How Confirmation Bias and Distractions Undermine Improved Home-Loan Disclosures,” Yale Law Journal Forum, 122, 377–400.
139.
StoopJudithKreutzerPaulienKirczJoost (2013), “Reading and Learning from Screens Versus Print: A Study in Changing Habits: Part 1–Reading Long Information Rich Texts,” New Library World, 114 (7–8), 284–300.
140.
SundararajanNarayanKripaAdesopeOlusola (2020), “Keep it Coherent: A Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Details Effect,” Educational Psychology Review, 32, 707–34.
141.
TatlerBenjamin W.HayhoeMary M.LandMichael F.BallardDana H. (2011), “Eye Guidance in Natural Vision: Reinterpreting Salience,” Journal of Vision, 11 (5), 5–5.
142.
VanEppsEricChinAlycia (2024), "Getting Information to Consumers: How to Inform Their Choices Effectively." Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11 (2), 172–80.
143.
VerplankenBasWoodWendy (2006), “Interventions to Break and Create Consumer Habits,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25 (1), 90–103.
144.
VesseyIris (1991), “Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature,” Decision Sciences, 22 (2), 219–40.
145.
VesseyIrisGallettaDennis (1991), “Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition,” Information Systems Research, 2 (1), 63–84.
146.
WangShudongJiaoHongYoungMichael J.BrooksThomasOlsonJohn (2008), “Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments: A Meta-Analysis of Testing Mode Effects,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68 (1), 5–24.
147.
WardAdrian F.DukeKristenGneezyAyeletBosMaarten W. (2017), “Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2 (2), 140–54.
148.
WästlundErik (2007), “Experimental Studies of Human-Computer Interaction: Working Memory and Mental Workload in Complex Cognition,” thesis, Gothenburg University Department of Psychology.
149.
WeberElke U.JohnsonEric J. (2009), “Mindful Judgment and Decision Making,” Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53–85.
150.
Weiss-CohenLeonardoNewallPhilip WSAytonPeter (2022), “Persistence is Futile: Chasing of Past Performance in Repeated Investment Choices,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28 (2), 341–59.
151.
WheelerPatrickArunachalamVairam (2009), “The Effects of Multimedia on Cognitive Aspects of Decision-Making,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10 (2), 97–116.
152.
WogalterMichael S. (2006), “Communication-human Information Processing (C-HIP) Model,” in Handbook of Warnings, WogalterMichael S., ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 51–61.
153.
WuJifeiZhuYiminFangXiangBanerjeePramit (2024), “Touch or Click? The Effect of Direct and Indirect Human-Computer Interaction on Consumer Responses,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 32 (2), 158–73.
154.
XiaLanSudharshanD. (2002), “Effects of Interruptions on Consumer Online Decision Processes,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (3), 265–80.
155.
ZhuYingMeyerJeffrey (2017), “Getting in Touch With Your Thinking Style: How Touchscreens Influence Purchase,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 51–58.
