Following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, many companies withdrew from or altered their Russian operations. This research explores the impact of such corporate actions on three important consumer mindset metrics: net brand buzz, consideration set inclusion, and purchase intent. The authors also examine the moderating role of the firm's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputation, the type of business (B2B vs. B2C), and the focal firm's decisions relative to peers. The authors test their propositions using a unique data set that combines a firm's decision related to its Russian operations, consumer mindset metrics, and ESG performance after controlling for firm-level factors. The findings indicate that decisions such as withdrawal from or suspension of activities in Russia are positively related to consumer mindset metrics. Moreover, this effect is accentuated for firms with a strong prior ESG reputation such that they experience a greater level of net brand buzz, brand consideration set inclusion, and purchase intent following the decision compared with the period before such decisions. This study contributes to understanding the relationship between such corporate actions and consumer mindset metrics in a novel geopolitical context, providing valuable insights for managerial decision making and public policy.
AbrahamsonEricRosenkopfLori (1993), “Institutional and Competitive Bandwagons: Using Mathematical Modeling as a Tool to Explore Innovation Diffusion,” Academy of Management Review, 18 (3), 487–517.
2.
AmisJohnBarneyJayMahoneyJoseph T.WangHeli (2020), “Why We Need a Theory of Stakeholder Governance—and Why This Is a Hard Problem,” Academy of Management Review, 45 (3), 499–503.
3.
AshforthBlake E.MaelFred (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20–39.
4.
AustinJames E.SeitanidiM. May (2012), “Collaborative Value Creation: A Review of Partnering Between Nonprofits and Businesses: Part I. Value Creation Spectrum and Collaboration Stages,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41 (5), 726–58.
5.
BhagwatYashodaWarrenNooshin L.BeckJoshua T.WatsonGeorge F.IV (2020), “Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (5), 1–21.
6.
BhattacharyaC.B.SenSankar (2003), “Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 76–88.
7.
ChenMing-JerHambrickDonald C. (1995), “Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ from Large Firms in Competitive Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2), 453–82.
8.
ChevalierJudith A.MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 345–54.
9.
ColicevAnatoliMalsheAshwinPauwelsKoenO’ConnorPeter (2018), “Improving Consumer Mindset Metrics and Shareholder Value Through Social Media: The Different Roles of Owned and Earned Media,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (1), 37–56.
10.
DahlsrudAlexander (2008), “How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15 (1), 1–13.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–60.
13.
DonaldsonThomasPrestonLee E. (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications,” Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 65–91.
14.
DuShuiliBhattacharyaC.B.SenSankar (2007), “Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (3), 224–41.
15.
EilertMeikeCherupAbigail Nappier (2020), “The Activist Company: Examining a Company’s Pursuit of Societal Change Through Corporate Activism Using an Institutional Theoretical Lens,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39 (4), 461–76.
FligsteinNeil (1985), “The Spread of the Multidivisional Form Among Large Firms, 1919–1979,” American Sociological Review, 50 (3), 377–91.
18.
FreemanR. Edward (1984), Stakeholder Management: Framework and Philosophy. Pitman.
19.
GillManpreetSridharShrihariGrewalRajdeep (2017), “Return on Engagement Initiatives: A Study of a Business-to-Business Mobile App,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (4), 45–66.
20.
GoldenbergJacobLibaiBarakMullerEitan (2001), “Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Word-of-Mouth Process,” Marketing Letters, 12, 211–23.
21.
GreveHenrich R. (1995), “Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3), 444–73.
22.
GreveHenrich R. (2000), “Marketing Niche Entry Decisions: Competition, Learning, and Strategy in Tokyo Banking, 1894–1936,” Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 816–36.
23.
GrewalRajdeepDharwadkarRavi (2002), “The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 82–97.
24.
GrewalRajdeepLilienGary L. (2012), “Business-to-Business Marketing: Looking Back, Looking Forward,” in Handbook of Business-to-Business Marketing, LilienGary L.GrewalRajdeep, eds. Edward Elgar, 3–12.
25.
HaunschildPamela R. (1993), “Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 564–92.
26.
HaunschildPamela R. (1994), “How Much Is That Company Worth? Interorganizational Relationships, Uncertainty, and Acquisition Premiums,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (3), 391–411.
27.
HaunschildPamela R.MinerAnne S. (1997), “Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (3), 472–500.
28.
HewettKellyRandWilliamRustRoland T.Van HeerdeHarald J. (2016), “Brand Buzz in the Echoverse,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 1–24.
29.
HillmanAmy J.KeimGerald D.SchulerDouglas (2004), “Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management, 30 (6), 837–57.
30.
HydockChrisPahariaNeeruBlairSean (2020), “Should Your Brand Pick a Side? How Market Share Determines the Impact of Corporate Political Advocacy,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (6), 1135–51.
31.
HydockChrisPahariaNeeruWeberT.J. (2019), “The Consumer Response to Corporate Political Advocacy: A Review and Future Directions,” Customer Needs & Solutions, 6 (3), 76–83.
32.
IngramPaulBaumJoel A.C. (1997), “Opportunity and Constraint: Organizations’ Learning from the Operating and Competitive Experience of Industries,” Strategic Management Journal, 18 (S1), 75–98.
33.
JensenMichael C. (2002), “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,” Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2), 235–56.
34.
JungJihyeMittalVikas (2020), “Political Identity and the Consumer Journey: A Research Review,” Journal of Retailing, 96 (1), 55–73.
35.
KlostermannJanHydockChrisDeckerReinhold (2022), “The Effect of Corporate Political Advocacy on Brand Perception: An Event Study Analysis,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31 (5), 780–97.
36.
KorschunDanielMartinKelly D.GauthamVadakkepatt (2020), “Marketing’s Role in Understanding Political Activity,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39 (4), 378–87.
37.
KotabeMasaakiKetkarSonia (2009), “Exit Strategies,” in The Sage Handbook of International Marketing, KotabeMasaakiHelsenKristiaan, eds. Sage, 238–60.
LevittBarbaraMarchJames G. (1988), “Organizational Learning,” Annual Review of Sociology, 14 (1), 319–38.
41.
LuFangzhouHuangLeiLiSixuan (2022), “Sanctions and Social Capital: Evidence from the Russian Invasion of Ukraine,” SSRN (March 24, 2022), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4108129.
42.
LuoXuemingRaithelSaschaWilesMichael A. (2013), “The Impact of Brand Rating Dispersion on Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (3), 399–415.
MishraSaurabhModiSachin B. (2016), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (1), 26–46.
46.
MoonSungkyunTuliKapil R.MukherjeeAnirban (2023), “Does Disclosure of Advertising Spending Help Investors and Analysts?” Journal of Marketing, 87 (3), 359–82.
47.
MukherjeeSourjoAlthuizenNiek (2020), “Brand Activism: Does Courting Controversy Help or Hurt a Brand?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37 (4), 772–88.
48.
NalickMichaelJosefyMatthewZardkoohiAsgharBiermanLeonard (2016), “Corporate Sociopolitical Involvement: A Reflection of Whose Preferences?” Academy of Management Perspectives, 30 (4), 384–403.
49.
NickersonDionneLoweMichaelPattabhiramiahAdithyaSorescuAlina (2022), “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Sales: An Accountability Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (2), 5–28.
50.
OzkanKubilay S.L. (2020), “International Market Exit by Firms: Misalignment of Strategy with the Foreign Market Risk Environment,” International Business Review, 29 (6), 101741.
51.
PajusteAneteTonioloAnna (2022), “Corporate Response to the War in Ukraine: Stakeholder Governance or Stakeholder Pressure?” SSRN (August 1), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4183604.
52.
PfarrerMichael D.DecellesKatherine A.SmithKen G.TaylorM. Susan (2008), “After the Fall: Reintegrating the Corrupt Organization,” Academy of Management Review, 33 (3), 730–49.
53.
RoodmanDavid (2011), “Fitting Fully Observed Recursive Mixed-Process Models with cmp,” Stata Journal, 11 (2), 159–206.
54.
SenSankarDuShuiliBhattacharyaC.B. (2016), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Consumer Psychology Perspective,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 70–75.
SonnenfeldJeffreyTianStevenZaslavskyStevenBhansaliYashVakilRyan (2022), “It Pays for Companies to Leave Russia,” SSRN (May 18), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4112885.
57.
SundaramAnant K.InkpenAndrew C. (2004), “The Corporate Objective Revisited,” Organization Science, 15 (3), 350–63.
Van MarrewijkMarcel (2003), “Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion,” Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105.
60.
WeberT.J.JoiremanJeffSprottDavid E.HydockChris (2023), “Differential Response to Corporate Political Advocacy and Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications for Political Polarization and Radicalization,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 42 (1), 74–93.
61.
Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute (2022), “Yale CELI List of Companies Leaving and Staying in Russia,” (accessed January 7, 2023), https://www.yalerussianbusinessretreat.com/.
