Consumer perceptions of brand motives related to corporate environmental responsibility affect the decisions of both corporations and consumers. Yet prior literature has typically viewed these firm motives as dichotomous, either solely intrinsic or solely extrinsic. The authors argue for a novel approach to positioning sustainability motives, where the brand communicates both intrinsic and extrinsic benefits together, as a joint motive. With a joint motive, a brand can highlight how an effort can benefit both planet and business with a “doing well by doing good” approach. Across five experiments, including a field study on Facebook, this research investigates the positive impact of the joint motive and its ability to enhance the credibility of sustainable initiatives via heightened perceptions of trustworthiness and expertise. Results provide converging evidence for the benefits of presenting a joint motive for sustainability efforts with implications for policy and practice.
AguinisHermanGlavasAnte (2012), “What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management, 38 (4), 932–68.
2.
AlbaJoseph W.Wesley HutchinsonJ. (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (4), 411–54.
3.
ApteSuhasShethJagdish N. (2016), The Sustainability Edge: How to Drive Top-Line Growth with Triple-Bottom-Line Thinking. University of Toronto Press.
4.
BaroneMichael J.MiyazakiAnthony D.TaylorKimberly A. (2000), “The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 248–62.
5.
Becker-OlsenKaren L.CudmoreB. AndrewHillRonald Paul (2006), “The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Business Research, 59 (1), 46–53.
6.
BeverlandMichael (2006), “The ‘Real Thing’: Branding Authenticity in the Luxury Wine Trade,” Journal of Business Research, 59, 251–8.
7.
BrownTom J.DacinPeter A. (1997), “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 68–84.
8.
CampbellMargaret C. (1995), “When Attention-Getting Advertising Tactics Elicit Consumer Inferences of Manipulative Intent: The Importance of Balancing Benefits and Investments,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4 (3), 225–54.
9.
ChernevAlexanderBlairSean (2015), “Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (6), 1412–25.
10.
ChernevAlexanderBlairSean (2021), “When Sustainability is not a Liability: The Halo Effect of Marketplace Morality,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31 (3), 551–69.
DuShuiliBhattacharyaChitrabhan B.SenSankar (2007), “Reaping Relationship Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (3), 224–41.
13.
DuShuiliBhattacharyaChitra B.SenSankar (2011), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier,” Management Science, 57 (9), 1528–45.
14.
Edinger-SchonsLaura MarieSipiläJenniSenSankarMendeGinaWiesekeJan (2018), “Are Two Reasons Better Than One? The Role of Appeal Type in Consumer Responses to Sustainable Products,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (4), 644–64.
15.
EichholtzPietKokNilsQuigleyJohn M. (2010), “Doing Well by Doing Good? Green Office Buildings,” American Economic Review, 100 (5), 2492–2509.
16.
EllenPam ScholderWebbDeborah J.MohrLois A. (2006), “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 147–57.
17.
ErdemTülinSwaitJoffre (2004), “Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 191–98.
18.
FeinSteven (1996), “Effects of Suspicion on Attributional Thinking and the Correspondence Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (6), 1164–84.
19.
ForehandMark R. (2000), “Extending Overjustification: The Effect of Perceived Reward-Giver Intention on Response to Rewards,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (6), 919–31.
20.
ForehandMark R.GrierSonya (2003), “When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 349–56.
21.
GielensKatrijnGeyskensIngeDeleersnyderBarbaraNoheMax (2018), “The New Regulator in Town: The Effect of Walmart’s Sustainability Mandate on Supplier Shareholder Value,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (2), 124–41.
22.
GiffinKim (1967), “The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Process,” Psychological Bulletin, 68 (2), 104–20.
23.
GilbertDaniel T.MalonePatrick S. (1995), “The Correspondence Bias,” Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 21–38.
24.
GoldsmithKellyNewmanGeorge E.DharRavi (2016), “Mental Representation Changes the Evaluation of Green Product Benefits,” Nature Climate Change, 6 (9), 847–50.
25.
GreenToddPelozaJohn (2014), “How Do Consumers Infer Corporate Social Responsibility? The Role of Organisation Size,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13 (4), 282–93.
26.
GriskeviciusVladasCantúStephanie M.Van VugtMark (2021), “The Evolutionary Bases for Sustainable Behavior: Implications for Marketing, Policy, and Social Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31 (1), 115–28.
27.
HabelJohannesSchonsLaura M.AlaviSaschaWiesekeJan (2016), “Warm Glow or Extra Charge? The Ambivalent Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Customers’ Perceived Price Fairness,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (1), 84–105.
28.
HawsKelly L.WinterichKaren PageNaylorRebecca Walker (2014), “Seeing the World Through GREEN-Tinted Glasses: Green Consumption Values and Responses to Environmentally Friendly Products,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (3), 336–54.
29.
HayesAndrew F. (2018), “Partial, Conditional, and Moderated Moderated Mediation: Quantification, Inference, and Interpretation,” Communication Monographs, 85 (1), 4–40.
30.
HildebrandDiogoSenSankarBhattacharyaChitra B. (2011), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Corporate Marketing Perspective,” European Journal of Marketing, 45 (9/10), 1353–64.
31.
HovlandCarl I.JanisIrving LesterKelleyHarold H. (1953), Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
HovlandCarl I.WeissWalter (1951), “The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 15 (4), 635–50.
IyerEaswar S.ReczekRebecca Walker (2017), “The Intersection of Sustainability, Marketing, and Public Policy: Introduction to the Special Section on Sustainability,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36 (2), 246–54.
35.
LeeSaeromBoltonLisa E.WinterichKaren Page (2017), “To Profit or Not to Profit? The Role of Greed Perceptions in Consumer Support for Social Ventures,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (4), 853–76.
36.
LeonidouConstantinos N.SkarmeasDionysis (2017), “Gray Shades of Green: Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism,” Journal of Business Ethics, 144 (2), 401–15.
37.
LichtensteinDonald R.DrumwrightMinette E.BraigBridgette M. (2004), “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 16–32.
38.
LuchsMichael G.NaylorRebecca WalkerIrwinJulie R.RaghunathanRajagopal (2010), “The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (5), 18–31.
39.
LuoXuemingBhattacharyaChitra B. (2009), “The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 198–213.
40.
LyonThomas P.MontgomeryA. Wren (2013), “Tweetjacked: The Impact of Social Media on Corporate Greenwash,” Journal of Business Ethics, 118 (4), 747–57
41.
LyonThomas P.MontgomeryA. Wren (2015). “The Means and End of Greenwash,” Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–49.
42.
MarínLonginosCuestasPedro J.RománSergio (2016), “Determinants of Consumer Attributions of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, 138 (2), 247–60.
43.
MatthesJörgWonnebergerAnkeSchmuckDesirée (2014), “Consumers’ Green Involvement and the Persuasive Effects of Emotional Versus Functional Ads,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (9), 1885–93.
44.
MayerRobert N.ScammonDebra L.ZickCathleen D. (1993), “Poisoning the Well: Do Environmental Claims Strain Consumer Credulity?” Advances in Consumer Research, 20 (1), 698–703.
45.
MazarNinaZhongChen-Bo (2010), “Do Green Products Make Us Better People?” Psychological Science, 21 (4), 494–98.
46.
McGinniesElliottWardCharles D. (1980), “Better Liked Than Right: Trustworthiness and Expertise in Credibility,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6 (3), 467–72.
47.
MohrLois A.WebbDeborah J.HarrisKatherine E. (2001), “Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35 (1), 45–72.
48.
MoranNoraBagchiRajesh (2019), “The Power of Emotional Benefits: Examining the Role of Benefit Focus on Donation Behavior,” Journal of Advertising, 48 (3), 284–91.
49.
MorhartFelicitasMalärLuciaAmelieGuèvremontGirardinFlorentGrohmannBianca (2015), “Brand Authenticity: An Integrative Framework and Measurement Scale,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (2), 200–218.
50.
NelsonPhillip (1974), “Advertising as Information,” Journal of Political Economy, 82 (4), 729–54.
51.
NewmanGeorge E.GorlinMargaritaDharRavi (2014), “When Going Green Backfires: How Firm Intentions Shape the Evaluation of Socially Beneficial Product Enhancements,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3), 823–39.
OhanianRoobina (1990), “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness,” Journal of Advertising, 19 (3), 39–52.
PahariaNeeru (2020), “Who Receives Credit or Blame? The Effects of Made-to-Order Production on Responses to Unethical and Ethical Company Production Practices,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (1), 88–104.
57.
PeckJoannKirkColleen P.LuangrathAndrea W.ShuSuzanne B. (2021), “Caring for the Commons: Using Psychological Ownership to Enhance Stewardship Behavior for Public Goods,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (2), 33–49.
58.
RimHyejoonSongDoori (2016), “How Negative Becomes Less Negative: Understanding the Effects of Comment Valence and Response Sidedness in Social Media,” Journal of Communication, 66 (3), 475–95.
59.
RomaniSimonaGrappiSilviaBagozziRichard P. (2016), “Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products,” Journal of Business Ethics, 135 (2), 253–64.
60.
RoseGregoryMerchantAltafOrthUlrichHorstmannFlorian (2016), “Emphasizing Brand Heritage: Does It Work? And How?”Journal of Business Research, 69 (2), 936–43.
61.
SchwartzDanielLoewensteinGeorge (2017), “The Chill of the Moment: Emotions and Proenvironmental Behavior,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36 (2), 255–68.
62.
SenSankarBhattacharyaChitra B.KorschunDaniel (2006), “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 158–66.
63.
ShultzClifford J.HolbrookMorris B. (1999), “Marketing and the Tragedy of the Commons: A Synthesis, Commentary, and Analysis for Action,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18 (2), 218–29.
64.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 845–51.
65.
SpiggleSusanNguyenHang T.CaravellaMary (2012), “More Than Fit: Brand Extension Authenticity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (6), 967–83.
66.
TezerAliBodurH. Onur (2020), “The Greenconsumption Effect: How Using Green Products Improves Consumption Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (1), 25–39.
67.
TrippCarolynJensenThomas D.CarlsonLes (1994), “The Effects of Multiple Product Endorsements by Celebrities on Consumers’ Attitudes and Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 535–47.
68.
UrdeMatsGreyserStephen A.BalmerJohn M.T. (2007), “Corporate Brands with a Heritage,” Journal of Brand Management, 15 (1), 4–19.
69.
VlachosPavlos A.TsamakosArgirisVrechopoulosAdam P.AvramidisPanagiotis K. (2009), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Attributions, Loyalty, and the Mediating Role of Trust,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (2), 170–80.
70.
WienerJoshua L.MowenJohn C. (1986), “Source Credibility: On the Independent Effects of Trust and Expertise,” in NA—Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, Richard J. Lutz, ed. 306–10.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
