BirauMia M.HildebrandDiogoWerleCarolina O.C. (2022), “How Communications That Portray Unhealthy Food Consumption Reduce Food Intake Among Dieters,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 41 (2), 162–176.
2.
BlockLauren G.GrierSonya A.ChildersTerry L.DavisBrennanEbertJane E.J.KumanyikaShiriki, et al. (2011), “From Nutrients to Nurturance: A Conceptual Introduction to Food Well-Being,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30 (1), 5–13.
3.
BlockLauren G.KellerPunam A.VallenBethWilliamsonSaraBirauMia M.GrinsteinAmir, et al. (2016), “The Squander Sequence: Understanding Food Waste at Each Stage of the Consumer Decision-Making Process,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 35 (2), 292–304.
4.
GrewalLaurenHmurovicJillianLambertonCaitReczekRebecca Walker (2019), “The Self-Perception Connection: Why Consumers Devalue Unattractive Produce,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (1), 89–107.
5.
HagenLinda (2020), “Pretty Healthy Food: How and When Aesthetics Enhance Perceived Healthiness,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (2), 129–45.
6.
MesirantaNinaNärvänenElinaMattilaMalla (2022), “Framings of Food Waste: How Food System Stakeholders Are Responsibilized in Public Policy Debate,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 41 (2), 144–161.
7.
MookerjeeSiddhanth (Sid)CornilYannHoeggJoAndrea (2021), “From Waste to Taste: How ‘Ugly' Labels Can Increase Purchase of Unattractive Produce,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (3), 62–77.
8.
MugelOphélieGurviezPatriciaDecropAlain (2019), “Eudaimonia Around the Kitchen: A Hermeneutic Approach to Understanding Food Well-Being in Consumers’ Lived Experiences,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38 (2), 280–95.
9.
RaghunathanRajagopalChandrasekaranDeepa (2021), “The Association Between the Attitude of Food-Waste-Aversion and BMI: An Exploration in India and the US,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31 (1), 81–90.
10.
WerleCarolina O.C.YamimAmanda PruskiTrendelOlivierRocheKévinNadaudPerrine (2022), “When Detailed Information Works Better: Comparison of Three- and Five-Color/Letter Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 41 (2), 177–195.