The adoption of front-of-package nutrition labels to promote healthier food choices is increasing worldwide, yet it remains unclear which types of nutrition labels are superior from a public policy perspective. This research compares two common forms of evaluative nutrition labels that vary in the number of colors and corresponding letters they display (three colors, A–C [3C] vs. five colors, A–E [5C]). Four studies, including a field study with vending machines and a study in an experimental supermarket using eye tracking, show that compared with the 3C label and no label (control) conditions, the 5C label enhances purchase intentions and choices of healthy alternatives. In particular, the 5C nutrition label is superior because it provides more information that helps consumers discriminate the products’ healthiness. This ability to discriminate healthiness modifies consumers’ perceived healthiness of products and influences both their purchase intentions and choice of healthy food options.
AndrewsJ. CraigBurtonScotKeesJeremy (2011), “Is Simpler Always Better? Consumer Evaluations of Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbols,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30 (2), 175–90.
3.
AndrewsJ. CraigLinChung-Tung JordanLevyAlan S.LoSerena (2014), “Consumer Research Needs from the Food and Drug Administration on Front-of-Package Nutritional Labeling,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 33 (1), 10–16.
4.
AntúnezLucíaGiménezAnaMaicheAlejandroAresGastón (2015), “Influence of Interpretation Aids on Attentional Capture, Visual Processing, and Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels,” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47 (July/August), 292–99.
5.
BalcombeKelvinFraserIainDi FalcoSalvatore (2010), “Traffic Lights and Food Choice: A Choice Experiment Examining the Relationship Between Nutritional Food Labels and Price,” Food Policy, 35 (3), 211–20.
6.
BarsalouLawrence W. (1983), “Ad Hoc Categories,” Memory & Cognition, 11 (3), 211–27.
7.
BeleiNinaGeyskensKellyGoukensCarolineRamanathanSureshLemminkJos (2012), “The Best of Both Worlds? Effects of Attribute-Induced Goal Conflict on Consumption of Healthy Indulgences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (6), 900–909.
8.
BerryChristopherBurtonScotHowlettElizabeth (2017), “It's Only Natural: The Mediating Impact of Consumers’ Attribute Inferences on the Relationships Between Product Claims, Perceived Product Healthiness, and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (September), 698–719.
9.
BialkovaSvetlanavan TrijpHans (2010), “What Determines Consumer Attention to Nutrition Labels?” Food Quality and Preference, 21 (8), 1042–51.
10.
BurtonScotCookLaurel AynneHowlettElizabethNewmanChristopher L. (2015), “Broken Halos and Shattered Horns: Overcoming the Biasing Effects of Prior Expectations Through Objective Information Disclosure,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (March), 240–56.
11.
CadarioRomainChandonPierre (2019), “Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments,” Marketing Science, 39 (3), 465–86.
12.
CamposSarahDoxeyJulianaHammondDavid (2011), “Nutrition Labels on Pre-Packaged Foods: A Systematic Review,” Public Health Nutrition, 14 (8), 1496–1506.
13.
ChernevAlexanderGalDavid (2010), “Categorization Effects in Value Judgments: Averaging Bias in Evaluating Combinations of Vices and Virtues,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (4), 738–47.
14.
ClementJesperKristensenToreGrønhaugKjell (2013), “Understanding Consumers’ In-Store Visual Perception: The Influence of Package Design Features on Visual Attention,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20 (2), 234–39.
15.
CowburnGillStockleyLynn (2005), “Consumer Understanding and Use of Nutrition Labelling: A Systematic Review,” Public Health Nutrition, 8 (1), 21–28.
16.
CrosettoPaoloMullerLaurentRuffieuxBernard (2016), “Réponses des Consommateurs à Trois Systèmes D’étiquetage Nutritionnel Face Avant,” Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique, 51 (June), 124–31.
17.
De EdelenyiFabien SzaboEgnellManonGalanPilarDruesne-PecolloNathalieHercbergSergeJuliaChantal (2019), “Ability of the Nutri-Score Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label to Discriminate the Nutritional Quality of Foods in the German Food Market and Consistency with Nutritional Recommendations,” Archives of Public Health, 77 (June), 28.
18.
De OliveiraMaria ConceiçãoSichieriRoselyMozzerRenzo Venturim (2008), “A Low-Energy-Dense Diet Adding Fruit Reduces Weight and Energy Intake in Women,” Appetite, 51 (2), 291–95.
19.
DrewnowskiAdamMonsivaisPabloMaillotMatthieuDarmonNicole (2007), “Low-Energy-Density Diets Are Associated with Higher Diet Quality and Higher Diet Costs in French Adults,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107 (6), 1028–32.
20.
DuboisPierreAlbuquerquePauloAllaisOlivierBonnetCélineBertailPatriceCombrisPierre, et al. (2020), “Effects of Front-of-Pack Labels on the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Food Purchases: Evidence from a Large-Scale Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49 (January), 119–38.
21.
DucrotPaulineJuliaChantalMéjeanCarolineKesse-GuyotEmmanuelleTouvierMathildeFezeuLéopold K., et al. (2016), “Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50 (5), 627–36.
GomezPierrickWerleCarolina O.C.CorneilleOlivier (2015), “The Pitfall of Nutrition Facts Label Fluency: Easier-to-Process Nutrition Information Enhances Purchase Intentions for Unhealthy Food Products,” Marketing Letters, 28, 1–13.
26.
GrechA.Allman-FarinelliM. (2015), “A Systematic Literature Review of Nutrition Interventions in Vending Machines That Encourage Consumers to Make Healthier Choices,” Obesity Reviews, 16 (12), 1030–41.
27.
GrunertKlaus G.WillsJosephine M. (2007), “A Review of European Research on Consumer Response to Nutrition Information on Food Labels,” Journal of Public Health, 15 (5), 385–99.
28.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
29.
HelferPeterShultzThomas R. (2014), “The Effects of Nutrition Labeling on Consumer Food Choice: A Psychological Experiment and Computational Model,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1331 (December), 174–85.
IkonenIinaSotgiuFrancescaAydinliAylinVerleghPeeter W.J. (2019), “Consumer Effects of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling: An Interdisciplinary Meta-Analysis,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (May), 360–83.
32.
IngoldTim (2004), “Culture on the Ground: The World Perceived Through the Feet,” Journal of Material Culture, 9 (3), 315–40.
IyengarSheena S.LepperMark R. (2000), “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 995–1006.
35.
JuliaChantalBlanchetOlivierMéjeanCarolinePéneauSandrineDucrotPaulineAllèsBenjamin, et al. (2016), “Impact of the Front-of-Pack 5-Colour Nutrition Label (5-CNL) on the Nutritional Quality of Purchases: An Experimental Study,” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13 (September), 101.
36.
KanterRebeccaVanderleeLanaVandevijvereStefanie (2018), “Front-of-Package Nutrition Labelling Policy: Global Progress and Future Directions,” Public Health Nutrition, 21 (8), 1399–408.
37.
KickbuschIlonaBuckettKevin (2010), Implementing Health in All Policies: Adelaide 2010. Adelaide, Australia: Health in All Policies Unit, SA Department of Health.
38.
KurzerPauletteCooperAlice (2011), “Hold the Croissant! The European Union Declares War on Obesity,” Journal of European Social Policy, 21 (2), 107–19.
39.
LedikweJenny H.BlanckHeidi M.KhanLaura KettelSerdulaMary K.SeymourJennifer D.TohillBeth C., et al. (2006), “Low-Energy-Density Diets Are Associated with High Diet Quality in Adults in the United States,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106 (8), 1172–80.
40.
LevinDaniel T. (2000), “Race as a Visual Feature: Using Visual Search and Perceptual Discrimination Tasks to Understand Face Categories and the Cross-Race Recognition Deficit,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129 (4), 559–74.
41.
LissitzRobert W.GreenSamuel B. (1975), “Effect of the Number of Scale Points on Reliability: A Monte Carlo Approach,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (1), 10–13.
MaillotMatthieuDarmonNicoleDarmonMichelLafayLionelDrewnowskiAdam (2007), “Nutrient-Dense Food Groups Have High Energy Costs: An Econometric Approach to Nutrient Profiling,” Journal of Nutrition, 137 (7), 1815–20.
44.
NewmanChristopher L.BurtonScotCraig AndrewsJ.NetemeyerRichard G.KeesJeremy (2018), “Marketers’ Use of Alternative Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbols: An Examination of Effects on Product Evaluations,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (November), 453–76.
45.
NewmanChristopher L.HowlettElizabethBurtonScot (2016), “Effects of Objective and Evaluative Front-of-Package Cues on Food Evaluation and Choice: The Moderating Influence of Comparative and Noncomparative Processing Contexts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (5), 749–66.
46.
NguyenSimone P. (2008), “Children's Evaluative Categories and Inductive Inferences Within the Domain of Food,” Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 17 (3), 285–99.
47.
NikolovaHristina DzhoglevaInmanJ. Jeffrey (2015), “Healthy Choice: The Effect of Simplified POS Nutritional Information on Consumer Choice Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (6), 817–35.
48.
NosofskyRobert M. (1986), “Attention, Similarity, and the Identification–Categorization Relationship,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115 (1), 39–57.
49.
OakesMichael E. (2005), “Beauty or Beast: Does Stereotypical Thinking About Foods Contribute to Overeating?” Food Quality and Preference, 16 (5), 447–54.
50.
OlstadDana LeeVermeerJulianneMcCargarLinda J.ProwseRachel J.L.RaineKim D. (2015), “Using Traffic Light Labels to Improve Food Selection in Recreation and Sport Facility Eating Environments,” Appetite, 91 (August), 329–35.
51.
PapiesE.PotjesI.KeesmanM.SchwinghammerS.van KoningsbruggenG.M. (2014), “Using Health Primes to Reduce Unhealthy Snack Purchases Among Overweight Consumers in a Grocery Store,” International Journal of Obesity, 38 (4), 597–602.
52.
Pérez-EscamillaRafaelObbagyJulie E.AltmanJean M.EsseryEve V.McGraneMary M.WongYat Ping, et al. (2012), “Dietary Energy Density and Body Weight in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review,” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112 (5), 671–84.
53.
PigeyreM.GenserL.DargentJ. (2017), “Améliorer L’étiquetage Nutritionnel: Une Cause Utile à Soutenir!,” Obésité, 12, 1–2.
54.
PoquetDelphineGinonEmilieSénécalCoralineChabanetClaireMaretteStéphanIssanchouSylvie, et al. (2020), “Effect of a Pleasure-Oriented Intervention on the Nutritional Quality of Midafternoon Snacks and on the Relationship Between Food Liking and Perceived Healthiness Within Mother-Child Dyads,” Food Quality and Preference, 84 (September), 103947.
55.
RatnerRebecca K.RiisJason (2014), “Communicating Science-Based Recommendations with Memorable and Actionable Guidelines,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (4), 13634–41.
56.
RobertoChristina A.LarsenPeter D.AgnewHenryBaikJennyBrownellKelly D. (2010), “Evaluating the Impact of Menu Labeling on Food Choices and Intake,” American Journal of Public Health, 100 (2), 312–18.
57.
RondoniAgneseGrassoSimona (2021), “Consumers Behaviour Towards Carbon Footprint Labels on Food: A Review of the Literature and Discussion of Industry Implications,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 301 (June), 127031.
58.
RozinPaul (1986), “Sweetness, Sensuality, Sin, Safety, and Socialization: Some Speculations,” in Sweetness, DobbingJ., ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
59.
RozinPaulAshmoreMicheleMarkwithMaureen (1996), “Lay American Conceptions of Nutrition: Dose Insensitivity, Categorical Thinking, Contagion, and the Monotonic Mind,” Health Psychology, 15 (6), 438–47.
60.
SanjariS. SetarehJahnSteffenBoztugYasemin (2017), “Dual-Process Theory and Consumer Response to Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Formats,” Nutrition Reviews, 75 (11), 871–82.
61.
ShepardRoger N.HovlandCarl I.JenkinsHerbert M. (1961), “Learning and Memorization of Classifications,” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75 (13), 1–42.
62.
SrullThomas K.WyerRobert S. (1989), “Person Memory and Judgment,” Psychological Review, 96 (1), 58–83.
63.
ThøgersenJohnNielsenKristian S. (2016), “A Better Carbon Footprint Label,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 125 (July), 86–94.
64.
ThomasManojMorwitzVicki G. (2009), “The Ease-of-Computation Effect: The Interplay of Metacognitive Experiences and Naive Theories in Judgments of Price Differences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (1), 81–91.
65.
ThorndikeAnne N.RiisJasonSonnenbergLillian M.LevyDouglas E. (2014), “Traffic-Light Labels and Choice Architecture: Promoting Healthy Food Choices,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46 (2), 143–49.
66.
ThorndikeAnne N.SonnenbergLillianRiisJasonBarracloughSusanLevyDouglas E. (2012), “A 2-Phase Labeling and Choice Architecture Intervention to Improve Healthy Food and Beverage Choices,” American Journal of Public Health, 102 (3), 527–33.
67.
TrudelRemiMurrayKyle B. (2011), “Why Didn’t I Think of That? Self-Regulation Through Selective Information Processing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (4), 701–12.
68.
TrudelRemiMurrayKyle B.KimSoyoungChenShuo (2015), “The Impact of Traffic Light Color-Coding on Food Health Perceptions and Choice,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21 (3), 255–75.
69.
UnkelbachChristian (2007), “Reversing the Truth Effect: Learning the Interpretation of Processing Fluency in Judgments of Truth,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33 (1), 219–30.
70.
VanclayJerome K.ShortissJohnAulsebrookScottGillespieAngus M.HowellBen C.JohanniRhoda, et al. (2011), “Customer Response to Carbon Labelling of Groceries,” Journal of Consumer Policy, 34 (1), 153–60.
71.
WiechaJean L.FinkelsteinDanielTropedPhilip J.FragalaMarenPetersonKaren E. (2006), “School Vending Machine Use and Fast-Food Restaurant Use Are Associated with Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake in Youth,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106 (10), 1624–30.
WyerRobert S.Jr. (2007), “Principles of Mental Representation,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, KruglanskiA.W.HigginsE.T., eds. New York: Guilford Press, 285–307.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
