Online product reviews are an influential source of information for consumers. With pressures to have readily available reviews, businesses must determine the best strategy for obtaining them. In 2009, for the first time in 29 years, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) updated endorsement guidelines to address concerns over possible deception within online reviews. Since that time, the FTC has issued four additional statements underlining its concerns and providing additional examples of how to comply. In 2017, the first action of enforcement was made against individuals failing to adhere to these guidelines. In light of the FTC’s guidelines and pressures to have reviews, businesses must ask which type of affiliated reviewers, if any, are the most influential. As to reviewer credibility, the literature offers contradictory predictions. Through three experiments with a total of 1,077 consumers, the authors examine effects of reviewer affiliation. The findings affirm the spirit of the FTC’s updated guidelines. However, affiliation comes at a cost. Depending on the competitive context, the cost may be worth the benefits.
AnSoontaeKangHannahKooSra (2018), “Sponsorship Disclosures of Native Advertising: Clarity and Prominence,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, (published online June 12), DOI:10.1111/joca.12212.
2.
AndersonEric T.SimesterDuncan I. (2014), “Reviews Without a Purchase: Low Ratings, Loyal Customers, and Deception,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3), 249–69.
CampbellColinGrimmPamela E. (2019), “The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38 (1), 110–23.
5.
ChandonEliseJaniszewskiChris (2009), “The Influence of Causal Conditional Reasoning on the Acceptance of Product Claims,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (6), 1003–11.
6.
Cleland, Richard L. (2011), Personal correspondence with Assistant Director, FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection, Division of Advertising Practices(December 1).
FilieriRaffaeleHofackerCharles F.AlguezauiSalma (2018), “What Makes Information in Online Consumer Reviews Diagnostic over Time? The Role of Review Relevancy, Factuality, Currency, Source Credibility and Ranking Score,” Computers in Human Behavior, 80 (March), 122–31.
11.
FloydKristopherFrelingRyanAlhoqailSaadChoHyun YoungFrelingTraci (2014), “How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Retailing, 90 (2), 217–32.
GodesDavidSilvaJose C. (2012), “Sequential and Temporal Dynamics of Online Opinion,” Marketing Science, 31 (3), 448–73.
20.
HuangNiBurtchGordonHongYiliPolmanEvan (2016), “Effects of Multiple Psychological Distances on Construal and Consumer Evaluation: A Field Study of Online Reviews,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26 (4), 474–82.
21.
HuangPengLurieNicholas H.MitraSabyasachi (2009), “Searching for Experience on the Web: An Empirical Examination of Consumer Behavior for Search and Experience Goods,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (2), 55–69.
JinLiyinHuBingyanHeYanqun (2014), “The Recent Versus the Out-Dated: An Experimental Examination of the Time-Variant Effects of Online Consumer Reviews,” Journal of Retailing, 90 (4), 552–66.
25.
MacKenzieScott B.LutzRichard J. (1989), “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretest Context,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (2), 48–65.
MaxhamJames G., III (2001), “Service Recovery’s Influence on Consumer Satisfaction, Positive Word-of-Mouth, and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Business Research, 54 (1), 11–24.
28.
MayerRobert N.HuhJisuCudeBrenda J. (2005), “Cues of Credibility and Price Performance of Life Insurance Comparison Web Sites,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39 (1), 71–94.
29.
McGinniesElliottWardCharles D. (1980), “Better Liked than Right: Trustworthiness and Expertise as Factors in Credibility,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6 (3), 467–72.
30.
MoeWendy W.TrusovMichael (2011), “The Value of Social Dynamics in Online Product Ratings Forums,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 444–56.
31.
NelsonPhillip (1970), “Information and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 78 (2), 311–29.
32.
NelsonPhillip (1974), “Advertising as Information,” Journal of Political Economy, 82 (4), 729–54.
33.
PettyRoss D.Craig AndrewsJ. (2008), “Covert Marketing Unmasked: A Legal and Regulatory Guide for Practices That Mask Marketing Messages,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27 (1), 7–18.
PriceLinda L.ArnouldEric J. (1999), “Commercial Friendships: Service Provider-Client Relationships in Context,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (4), 38–56.
37.
PriesterJoseph R.PettyRichard E. (1995), “Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (6), 637–54.
38.
PriesterJoseph R.PettyRichard E. (2003), “The Influence of Spokesperson Trustworthiness on Message Elaboration, Attitude Strength, and Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (4), 408–21.
39.
PurnawirawanNathaliaEisendMartinPelsmackerPatrick DeDensNathalie (2015), “A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Role of Valence in Online Reviews,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31, 17–27.
40.
RubinVickiMagerCarolFriedmanHershey H. (1982), “Company President Versus Spokesperson in Television Commercials,” Journal of Advertising Research, 22 (4), 31–33.
SeeleyJames J. (1972), “The FTC’s Public Interest Requirement: An Anomaly in Consumer Protection,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 6 (1), 12–34.
43.
SenecalSylvainNantelJacques (2004), “The Influence of Online Product Recommendations on Consumers’ Online Choices,” Journal of Retailing, 80 (2), 159–69.
44.
ShohamMeyravMoldovanSaritSteinhartYael (2017), “Positively Useless: Irrelevant Negative Information Enhances Positive Impressions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (2), 147–59.
45.
SmithDonnavieveMenonSatyaSivakumarK. (2005), “Online Peer and Editorial Recommendations, Trust, and Choice in Virtual Markets,”Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (3), 15–37.
46.
StaffordMarla RoyneStaffordThomas F.DayEllen (2002), “A Contingency Approach: The Effects of Spokesperson Type and Service Type on Service Advertising Perceptions,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (2), 17–35.
47.
StephensNancyFarandaWilliam T. (1993), “Using Employees as Advertising Spokespersons,” Journal of Services Marketing, 7 (2), 36–46.
48.
SternthalBrianPhillipsLynn W.DholakiaRuby (1978), “The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: A Situational Analysis,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 42 (3), 285–314.
49.
StewardMichelle D.NarusJames A.RoehmMichelle L. (2018), “An Exploratory Study of Business-to-Business Online Customer Reviews: External Online Professional Communities and Internal Vendor Scorecards,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (2), 173–89.
50.
WangAlex (2005), “The Effects of Expert and Consumer Endorsements on Audience Response,” Journal of Advertising Research, 45 (4), 402–12.
51.
WilsonElizabeth J.SherrellDaniel L. (1993), “Source Effects in Communication and Persuasion Research: A Meta-Analysis of Effect Size,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (2), 101–12.
52.
WojdynskiBartosz W.EvansNathaniel J. (2016), “Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (2), 157–68.
YouYaVadakkepattGautham G.JoshiAmit M. (2015), “A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (2), 19–39.
55.
ZhangJason Q.CraciunGeorgianaShinDongwood (2010), “When Does Electronic Word-of-Mouth Matter? A Study of Consumer Product Reviews,” Journal of Business Research, 63 (12), 1336–41.
56.
ZhuFengZhangXiaoquan (2010), “Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (2), 133–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
