Food waste is a major threat to global sustainability. Much of it is caused by the aesthetic requirements imposed by retailers, which assume that consumers are not interested in buying misshapen produce unless it is accompanied by significant price discounts. This article proposes an alternative way to market such produce. A pilot study confirms consumers’ aversion to misshapen produce and identifies inferior taste perceptions as its dominant driver. Three studies then show that using anthropomorphism (i.e., attributing human characteristics to nonhuman objects) can increase purchase intentions for misshapen produce. Specifically, displaying misshapen produce with a smiling face and presenting shape abnormalities as body parts in point-of-purchase stimuli trigger positive affective reactions. These affective reactions enhance taste perceptions, thereby leading to higher purchase intentions and food choice. In addition, this research tests environmental concern as a moderator and measures actual behaviors in a grocery shopping context. The findings suggest an intervention that could be more effective than current public campaigns in the effort to curb waste along the entire food chain.
AlbaJoseph W.Wesley HutchinsonJ. (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (4), 411–54.
2.
AlcockIan (2012), “Measuring Commitment to Environmental Sustainability: The Development of a Valid and Reliable Measure,” Methodological Innovations Online, 7 (2), 13–26.
3.
Aschemann-WitzelJessicaHoogeIlona deAmaniPegahBech-LarsenTinoOostindjerMarije (2015), “Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action,” Sustainability, 7 (6), 6457–77.
4.
AuneDagfinnGiovannucciEdwardBoffettaPaoloFadnesLars T.KeumNaNaNoratTeresa. (2017), “Fruit and Vegetable Intake and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Total Cancer and All-Cause Mortality—A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies,” International Journal of Epidemiology, 46 (3), 1029–56.
5.
BerlyneDaniel E. (1970), “Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value,” Perception & Psychophysics, 8 (5), 279–86.
6.
BlessHerbertSchwarzNorbert (2010), “Mental Construal and the Emergence of Assimilation and Contrast Effects: The Inclusion/Exclusion Model,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 42, ZannaMark P., ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 319–73.
7.
BlockLaurenGrierSonyaChildersTerryDavisBrennanEbertJaneKumanyikaShiriki. (2011), “From Nutrients to Nurturance: A Conceptual Introduction to Food Well-Being,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30 (1), 5–13.
8.
BlockLauren G.KellerPunam A.VallenBethWilliamsonSaraBirauMia M.GrinsteinAmir. (2016), “The Squander Sequence: Understanding Food Waste at Each Stage of the Consumer Decision-Making Process.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 35 (2), 292–304.
9.
BublitzMelissa G.PeracchioLaura A.AndreasenAlan R.KeesJeremyKidwellBlairMillerElizabeth Gelfand. (2013), “Promoting Positive Change: Advancing the Food Well-Being Paradigm,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (8), 1211–18.
Cadario, Romain, and Pierre Chandon (2018), “Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments,” Marketing Science (forthcoming).
12.
ChaikenShellyMaheswaranDurairaj (1994), “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (3), 460–73.
13.
CreusenMarielle E.H.SchoormansJan P.L. (2005), “The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (1), 63–81.
14.
DeBackerCharlotteJ.HuddersLiselot (2016), “Look Who’s Cooking: Investigating the Relationship Between Watching Educational and Edutainment TV Cooking Shows, Eating Habits and Everyday Cooking Practices Among Men and Women in Belgium,” Appetite, 96, 494–501.
15.
DeBondtAnneleen Van KerckhoveCarolineGeuensMaggie (2018), “‘Look at That Body!’ The Influence of Anthropomorphic Forms in Package Design of Consumer Goods,” International Journal of Advertising(published online May 17), DOI: 10.1080/02650487.2018.1470919.
16.
De HoogeIlona E.OostindjerMarijeAschemann-WitzelJessicaNormannAnneLooseSimone MuellerAlmliValérie Lengard (2017), “This Apple Is Too Ugly for Me!: Consumer Preferences for Suboptimal Food Products in the Supermarket and at Home,” Food Quality and Preference, 56, 80–92.
17.
De SolierIsabelle (2005), “TV Dinners: Culinary Television, Education and Distinction,” Continuum, 19 (4), 465–81.
18.
DionKarenBerscheidEllenWalsterElaine (1972), “What Is Beautiful Is Good,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 (3), 285–90.
19.
EaglyAlice H.AshmoreRichard D.MakhijaniMona G.LongoLaura C. (1991), “What Is Beautiful Is Good, but…: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype,” Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1), 109–28.
20.
EpleyNicholasWaytzAdamCacioppoJohn T. (2007), “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism,” Psychological Review, 114 (4), 864–86.
FazioRussell H.Roskos-EwoldsenDavid R.PowellMartha C. (1994), “Attitudes, Perception, and Attention,” in The Heart’s Eye, NiedenthallPaula M.KitayamaShinobu, eds. New York: Academic Press, 198–217.
23.
FrijdaNico H. (1986), The Emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Food and Agriculture Organization (2013), “Food Wastage Footprint: Impacts on Natural Resources,” summary report(accessed January 15, 2019),http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3347e/i3347e.pdf.
25.
GlanzKarenBasilMichaelMaibachEdwardGoldbergJeanneSnyderDan (1998), “Why Americans Eat What They Do: Taste, Nutrition, Cost, Convenience, and Weight Control Concerns as Influences on Food Consumption,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98 (10), 1118–26.
26.
GrewalDhruvKrishnanRamBakerJulieBorinNorm (1998), “The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 74 (3), 331–52.
27.
GriffinAngela M.LangloisJudith H. (2006), “Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or Is Ugly Bad?” Social Cognition, 24 (2), 187–206.
28.
GrunertKlaus G. (2005), “Food Quality and Safety: Consumer Perception and Demand,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32 (3), 369–91.
29.
GustavssonJennyCederbergChristelSonessonUlfOtterdijkRobert VanMeybeckAlexandre (2011), Global Food Losses and Food Waste. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
30.
HassenzahlMarc (2004), “The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products,” Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (4), 319–49.
31.
HäublGeraldElrodTerry (1999), “The Impact of Congruity Between Brand Name and Country of Production on Consumers’ Product Quality Judgments,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16 (3), 199–215.
32.
HayesAndrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
34.
HellerMartin C.KeoleianGregory A. (2003), “Assessing the Sustainability of the US Food System: A Life Cycle Perspective,” Agricultural Systems, 76 (3), 1007–41.
35.
HoeggJoAndreaAlbaJoseph W.DahlDarren W. (2010), “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Influence of Aesthetics on Product Feature Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 419–30.
36.
HoyerWayne D. (1984), “An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (3), 822–29.
37.
KriflikLynda S.YeatmanHeather (2005), “Food Scares and Sustainability: A Consumer Perspective,” Health, Risk & Society, 7 (1), 11–24.
38.
KummuMattiMoelHans dePorkkaMiinaSiebertStefanOlliVarisWardPhilip J (2012), “Lost Food, Wasted Resources: Global Food Supply Chain Losses and Their Impacts on Freshwater, Cropland, and Fertiliser Use,” Science of the Total Environment, 438, 477–89.
39.
LandwehrJan R.McGillAnn L.HerrmannAndreas (2011), “It’s Got the Look: The Effect of Friendly and Aggressive ‘Facial’ Expressions on Product Liking and Sales,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (3), 132–146.
40.
LoebnitzNataschaGrunertKlaus G. (2014), “The Impact of Subjective and Objective Knowledge on Consumers Risk Perceptions and Evaluation of Food Shape Abnormalities,” in Proceedings of theInternational Food Marketing Research Symposium. Aarhus, Denmark: Institute of Food Products Marketing.
41.
LoebnitzNataschaGrunertKlaus G. (2015), “The Effect of Food Shape Abnormality on Purchase Intentions in China,” Food Quality and Preference, 40, 24–30.
42.
LoebnitzNataschaSchuitemaGeertjeGrunertKlaus G. (2015), “Who Buys Oddly Shaped Food and Why? Impacts of Food Shape Abnormality and Organic Labeling on Purchase Intentions,” Psychology & Marketing, 32 (4), 408–21.
43.
LokenBarbaraWardJames (1990), “Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), 111–26.
44.
LuskJayson L.BriggemanBrian C. (2009), “Food Values,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91 (1), 184–96.
45.
LyerlyJordan E.ReeveCharlie L. (2015), “Development and Validation of a Measure of Food Choice Values,” Appetite, 89, 47–55.
46.
MaiRobertHoffmannStefan (2015), “How to Combat the Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition: The Influencing Role of Health Consciousness,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34 (1), 63–83.
47.
MandlerGeorge (1982), “The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste,” in Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium, ClarkMargaret S.FiskeSusan T., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3–36.
48.
MelbyeElisabeth LindOnozakaYukoHansenHåvard (2016), “Throwing It All Away: Exploring Affluent Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Wasting Edible Food,”Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23 (4), 1–14.
49.
Meyers-LevyJoanTyboutAlice M. (1989), “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), 39–54.
50.
MeyvisTomOsselaerStijn M.J. Van, (2017), “Increasing the Power of Your Study by Increasing the Effect Size,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (5), 1157–73.
NisbettRichard E.WilsonTimothy D. (1977), “The Halo Effect: Evidence for Unconscious Alteration of Judgments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (4), 250.
53.
PeracchioLaura A.TyboutAlice M. (1996), “The Moderating Role of Prior Knowledge in Schema-Based Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (3), 177–92.
54.
PlutchikRobert (1980), Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: HarperCollins College Division.
55.
PorpinoGustavoWansinkBrianParenteJuracy (2016), “Wasted Positive Intentions: The Role of Affection and Abundance on Household Food Waste,” Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22 (7), 1–19.
56.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (4), 717–31.
57.
ReisHarry T.WilsonIlona McdougalMonestereCarlaBernsteinStuartClarkKellySeidlEdward. (1990), “What Is Smiling Is Beautiful and Good,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 20 (3), 259–67.
58.
StancuVioletaHaugaardPernilleLähteenmäkiLiisa (2016), “Determinants of Consumer Food Waste Behaviour: Two Routes to Food Waste,” Appetite, 96, 7–17.
59.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.MTrijpHans C.M. van (1996), “Quality Guidance: A Consumer-Based Approach to Food Quality Improvement Using Partial Least Squares,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 23, 195–215.
60.
SternPaul C. (2000), “New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior,” Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 407–24.
61.
StuartTristram (2009), Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
SynnottAnthony (1989), “Truth and Goodness, Mirrors and Masks—Part I: A Sociology of Beauty and the Face,” British Journal of Sociology, 40 (4), 607–36.
64.
ThalerRichard H.SunsteinCass R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65.
TractinskyNoamKatzAdi S.IkarDror (2000), “What Is Beautiful Is Usable,” Interacting with Computers, 13 (2), 127–45.
66.
TrudelRemiArgoJennifer J. (2013), “The Effect of Product Size and Form Distortion on Consumer Recycling Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (4), 632–43.
VermeirIrisVerbekeWim (2006), “Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer ‘Attitude–Behavioral Intention’ Gap,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19 (2), 169–94.
69.
VeryzerRobert W.Jr.Wesley HutchinsonJ. (1998), “The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 374–94.
70.
VisschersVivianne H.M.WickliNadineSiegristMichael (2016), “Sorting Out Food Waste Behaviour: A Survey on the Motivators and Barriers of Self-Reported Amounts of Food Waste in Households,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 66–78.
71.
WansinkBrian (2015), “Change Their Choice! Changing Behavior Using the CAN Approach and Activism Research,” Psychology & Marketing, 32 (5), 486–500.
ZimmerMary R.StaffordThomas F.StaffordMarla Royne (1994), “Green Issues: Dimensions of Environmental Concern,” Journal of Business Research, 30 (1), 63–74.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
