This study aimed to explore Russian young people’s perceptions of autonomy and the sources of these perceptions. It included thirty participants (16 female and 14 male) aged 11 to 24. Thirteen were Muscovites and 17 were from other Russian cities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online in summer of 2022. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the data. Findings suggest that the majority of participants perceived autonomous actions in a non-specific way or as being actions independent from others. Other meanings included adult, unruly, disciplined, responsible, successful, creative, and authoritative. The main sources of these perceptions were family, peers, education, and public opinion. Additional sources were the media, university, supplementary education, romantic partners, work, and older people. Overall, it is recommended to use non-interview methods such as observation to determine the influence of different sources on youth perceptions of individual autonomy, as it was difficult to fully capture this in interviews, although their presence was detected.
AlexanderN.PetrayT.McDowallA. (2022). More learning, less activism: Narratives of childhood in Australian media representations of the School Strike for Climate. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2021.28
3.
AudetÉ. C.LevineS. L.HoldingA. C.KoestnerR.PowersT. A. (2021). A remarkable alliance: Sibling autonomy support and goal progress in emerging adulthood. Family Relations, 70(5), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12562
4.
AudetÉ. C.LevineS. L.HoldingA. C.PowersT. A.KoestnerR. (2022). Navigating the ups and downs: Peer and family autonomy support during personal goals and crises on identity development. Self and Identity, 21(4), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2021.1939772
5.
AyllónS.AlsinaÁ.ColomerJ. (2019). Teachers’ involvement and students’ self-efficacy: Keys to achievement in higher education. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216865
6.
BalaguerÁ.BenítezE.AlbertosA.LaraS. (2020). Not everything helps the same for everyone: Relevance of extracurricular activities for academic achievement. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00573-0
BanerjeeR.HalderS. (2021). Effect of teacher and parent autonomy support on academic motivation: A central focus of self-determination theory. World Futures, 77(6), 452–480.
9.
BarniD.RussoC.ZagreanI.Di FabioM.DanioniF. (2022). Adolescents’ internalization of moral values: The role of paternal and maternal promotion of volitional functioning. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1789494
10.
BasriF. (2023). Factors influencing learner autonomy and autonomy support in a faculty of education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1798921
11.
BemD. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183.
12.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62.
13.
Benito-GomezM.WilliamsK. N.McCurdyA.FletcherA. C. (2020). Autonomy-supportive parenting in adolescence: Cultural variability in the contemporary United States. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12362
14.
BülowA.NeubauerA. B.SoenensB.BoeleS.DenissenJ. J. A.KeijsersL. (2022). Universal ingredients to parenting teens: Parental warmth and autonomy support promote adolescent well-being in most families. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21071-0
15.
ChanS. M.ChanK.-W. (2013). Adolescents’ susceptibility to peer pressure: Relations to parent-adolescent relationship and adolescents’ emotional autonomy from parents. Youth & Society, 45(2), 286–302.
16.
ChapinL. A.FowlerM. A.DeansC. L. (2022). The role of adult facilitators in arts-based extracurricular settings: Perceived factors for success of adult-youth relationships. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22513
17.
ChirkovV. I.RyanR. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005006
18.
DavisW. J.CoxM.TevingtonP.Brown UrbanJ.LinverM. R. (2022). “That’s just a part of growing up”: A study of non-formal educators’ lay theories of adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 37(5), 714–742.
19.
Diaz-StrongD. X. (2022). “When did I stop being a child?” The subjective feeling of adulthood of Mexican and Central American unaccompanied 1.25 generation immigrants. Emerging Adulthood, 10(5), 1286–1298.
20.
DubrovD.TatarkoA. (2018). Intergenerational transmission of values in urban and rural areas of Russia: The role of perceived psychological closeness. In LebedevaN.DimitrovaR.BerryJ. (Eds.), Changing values and identities in the post-communist world (pp. 117–130). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72616-8_7
21.
EloS.KyngäsH. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
22.
García-CastillaF. J.Martínez-SánchezI.CamposG.Arroyo ResinoD. (2020). Impact of gender and relationship status on young people’s autonomy and psychological wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1735. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01735
23.
GutiérrezM.TomásJ. M. (2019). The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students’ academic success mediated by academic self-efficacy and school engagement. Educational Psychology, 39(6), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1566519
24.
HaglerM.PoonC. Y. S. (2023). Contextual antecedents and well-being indicators associated with children’s and adolescents’ access to supportive nonparent adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(8), 3328–3347. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.23016
25.
HareA. L.SzwedoD. E.SchadM. M.AllenJ. P. (2015). Undermining adolescent autonomy with parents and peers: The enduring implications of psychologically controlling parenting. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(4), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12167
26.
IspaJ. (1994). Child care in Russia: In transition. ERIC.
27.
JiangJ.VaurasM.VoletS.SaloA.-E.KajamiesA. (2019). Autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching in the classroom: A video-based case study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030229
28.
KagitcibasiC. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959
29.
KilH.AllenM.TaingJ.MageauG. A. (2022). Autonomy support in disclosure and privacy maintenance regulation within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 29(2), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12419
30.
LaursenC. S.NielsenM. L.DyreborgJ. (2021). Young workers on digital labor platforms: Uncovering the double autonomy paradox. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 11(4), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.127867
31.
LigaF.Lo CocoA.MussoP.IngugliaC.CostaS.Lo CricchioM. G.IngogliaS. (2020). Parental psychological control, autonomy support and Italian emerging adult’s psychosocial well-being: A cluster analytic approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 37–55. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1532887
MaC.MastrotheodorosS.LanX. (2022). Linking classmate autonomy support with prosocial behavior in Chinese left-behind adolescents: The moderating role of self-esteem and grit. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, 111679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111679
34.
ManzoniA. (2016). Conceptualizing and measuring youth independence multidimensionally in the United States. Acta Sociologica, 59(4), 362–377.
35.
Marbell-PierreK. N.GrolnickW. S.StewartA. L.Raftery-HelmerJ. N. (2019). Parental autonomy support in two cultures: The moderating effects of adolescents’ self-construals. Child Development, 90(3), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12947
36.
MayerB.KuramschewA.TrommsdorffG. (2009). Familienbezogene Werte und Zukunftsvorstellungen in der Adoleszenz: Ein deutsch-russischer Vergleich. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Der Erziehung Und Sozialisation, 29(1), 29–44.
37.
MayesE.HartupM. E. (2021). News coverage of the School Strike for Climate movement in Australia: The politics of representing young strikers’ emotions. Journal of Youth Studies, 25, 994–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1929887
38.
McCurdyA. L.WilliamsK. N.LeeG. Y.Benito-GomezM.FletcherA. C. (2020). Measurement of parental autonomy support: A review of theoretical concerns and developmental considerations. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(3), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12389
39.
MoèA.KatzI. (2021). Emotion regulation and need satisfaction shape a motivating teaching style. Teachers and Teaching, 27(5), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1777960
40.
MoscardinoU.MiconiD.CarraroL. (2020). Implicit and explicit self-construals in Chinese-heritage and Italian nonimmigrant early adolescents: Associations with self-esteem and prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1397.
41.
PogereE. F.López-SangilM. C.García-SeñoránM. M.GonzálezA. (2019). Teachers’ job stressors and coping strategies: Their structural relationships with emotional exhaustion and autonomy support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.001
42.
SalikhovaN.LynchM.SalikhovaA. (2022). Two generations of mother-child relationships: A self-determination theory analysis of the social situation of development. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0410
43.
SaundersB.SimJ.KingstoneT.BakerS.WaterfieldJ.BartlamB.BurroughsH.JinksC. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
44.
SavolainenL.RuckensteinM. (2022). Dimensions of autonomy in human–algorithm relations. New Media & Society.
45.
ShenJ.JiaJ.WangL.FangX. (2023). Autonomy-relatedness patterns and their association with academic and psychological adjustment among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(6), 1272–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01745-2
46.
ShibataS. (2020). Gig work and the discourse of autonomy: Fictitious freedom in Japan’s digital economy. New Political Economy, 25(4), 535–551.
TammA.KasearuK.TulvisteT.TrommsdorffG. (2018). Links between adolescents’ relationships with peers, parents, and their values in three cultural contexts. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616671827
49.
TesarM.TongZ. P.GibbonsA.ArndtS.SansomA. (2019). Children’s literature in China: Revisiting ideologies of childhood and agency. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 20(4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119888494
50.
TilgaH.Kalajas-TilgaH.HeinV.RaudseppL.KokaA. (2021). Perceived autonomy support from peers, parents, and physical education teachers as predictors of physical activity and health-related quality of life among adolescents—A one-year longitudinal study. Education Sciences, 11(9), 457.
51.
TõuguP.TulvisteT.KasearuK.TalvesK.AlbertI. (2017). Independence and interdependence values in changing societies: A three-generation comparative study in Estonia, Germany, and Russia. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 9(2), 41–58.
52.
VrublevskayaP.MobergM.SztajerS. (2019). The role of grandmothers in the religious socialization of young adults in post-socialist Russia and Poland. Religion, 49(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1584351
53.
WatkinsD.MortazaviS.TrofimovaI. (2000). Independent and interdependent conceptions of self: An investigation of age, gender, and culture differences in importance and satisfaction ratings. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(2), 113–134.
54.
WeinsteinN.LegateN.KumashiroM.RyanR. M. (2016). Autonomy support and diastolic blood pressure: Long term effects and conflict navigation in romantic relationships. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 212–225.
55.
YatesE. (2022). Developing or degrading young workers? How business strategy and the labour process shape job quality across different industrial sectors in England. Work, Employment and Society, 37(5) 1186–1205.
56.
Young-JonesA.LevesqueC.FursaS.McCainJ. (2021). Autonomy-supportive language in the syllabus: Supporting students from the first day. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 541–556.
57.
YuS.AssorA.YuH.WangQ. (2023). Autonomy as a potential moral resource: Parenting practices supporting youth need for autonomy negatively predict youth acceptance of academic dishonesty. Learning and Individual Differences, 101, 102245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102245
58.
ZhaoJ.QinY. (2021). Perceived teacher autonomy support and students’ deep learning: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of perceived peer support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 652796. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652796
59.
ZhouL.-H.NtoumanisN.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC. (2019). Effects of perceived autonomy support from social agents on motivation and engagement of Chinese primary school students: Psychological need satisfaction as mediator. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 323–330.
60.
ZvyagintsevR.KonstantinovskiyD.PinskayaM.KosaretskyS. (2022). Occupational well-being of Russian teachers: Risk factors and areas for improvement. Issues in Educational Research, 32(2), 825–847.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
