Moving From Passion to Purpose: A STEM-Focused After-school Program’s Influence on Purpose Outcomes

Abstract

Despite efforts to increase diversity in STEM fields, marginalized populations—particularly women and Black and Latinx workers—remain underrepresented in STEM professions. The present qualitative study sought to explore the relationship between sense of purpose and STEM engagement within an after-school, experiential (i.e., involving hands-on learning) STEM enrichment program, called Change Makers. Specifically, semi-structured interviews with racially diverse and predominantly low SES high school students (N = 13, 30.8% self-identified female) and their program instructors (N = 3, 66% self-identified female) were qualitatively analyzed using a grounded theory-informed approach. Results indicate that engagement in Change Makers contributed to youth transforming their preexisting STEM interest into three purpose-related constructs: (1) self-efficacy experiences (general and specific to science), (2) increased willingness to engage in career exploration, and (3) deepened prosocial motivation. These findings underscore the value of connecting youth with experiential purpose curriculum to improve the STEM career pipeline. Finally, these findings represent insightful perspectives regarding the mutable nature of purpose development. Limitations are discussed and recommendations are made for future research and programming.

Keywords

purpose in life adolescence STEM education positive youth development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afterschool Alliance. (2020). America After 3PM: Demand Grows, Opportunity Shrinks. http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/AA3PM/

Alfred

L. J.

Atkins

Lopez

Chavez

Avila

Paolini

(2005). A science pipeline pathway for training underrepresented students in the biomedical sciences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 11(1), 45–60.

Allen

P. J.

Chang

Gorrall

B. K.

Waggenspack

Fukuda

Little

T. D.

Noam

G. G.

(2019). From quality to outcomes: A national study of afterschool STEM programming. International Journal of Stem Education, 6(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0191-2

Arnold

M. E.

(2017). Supporting adolescent exploration and commitment: Identity formation, thriving, and positive youth development. Journal of Youth Development, 12(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2017.522

Association for Experiential Learning. (2017). What is experiential education?. http://www.aee.org/what-is-ee

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura

Locke

E. A.

(2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87

Benson

P. L.

(2008). Sparks: How parents can ignite the hidden strengths of your teenagers. John Wiley & Sons.

Benson

P. L.

Scales

P. C.

(2009). The definition and preliminary measurement of thriving in adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802399240

10.

Blattner

M. C. C.

Liang

Lund

Spencer

(2013). Searching for a sense of purpose: The role of parents and effects on self-esteem among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 839–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.008

11.

Blickenstaff

J. C.

(2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072

12.

Blustein

D. L.

Erby

Meerkins

Soldz

Ezema

G. N.

(2022). A Critical exploration of assumptions underlying STEM career development. Journal of Career Development, 49(2), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845320974449

13.

Bonebright

C. A.

Clay

D. L.

Ankenmann

R. D.

(2000). The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(4), 469–477.

14.

Britner

S. L.

Pajares

(2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131

15.

Bronk

K. C.

Hill

P. L.

Lapsley

D. K.

Talib

T. L.

Finch

(2009). Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271439

16.

Bronk

K. C.

(2012). A grounded theory of the development of noble youth purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1), 78–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558411412958

17.

Bronk

K. C.

Baumsteiger

Mangan

Riches

Dubon

Benavides

Bono

(2019). Fostering purpose among young adults: Effective online interventions. Journal of Character Education, 15(2), 21–38.

18.

Bronk

K. C.

Mangan

(2016). Strategies for cultivating purpose among adolescents in clinical settings. In Russo-Netzer

Schulenberg

S. E.

Batthyany

(Eds.), Clinical perspectives on meaning: Positive and existential psychotherapy (pp. 407–421). Springer International Publishing.

19.

Bronk

K. C.

Riches

B. R.

Mangan

S. A.

(2018). Claremont purpose scale: A measure that assesses the three dimensions of purpose among adolescents. Research in Human Development, 15(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1441577

20.

Burch

G. F.

Giambatista

Batchelor

J. H.

Burch

J. J.

Hoover

J. D.

Heller

N. A.

(2019). A Meta-Analysis of the relationship between experiential learning and learning outcomes. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 17(3), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12188

21.

Burrow

A. L.

O’Dell

A. C.

Hill

P. L.

(2010). Profiles of a developmental asset: Youth purpose as a context for hope and well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(11), 1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9481-1

22.

Carlone

H. B.

Johnson

(2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

23.

Corbin

Strauss

(2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.

24.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

25.

Crocetti

Rubini

Meeus

(2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002

26.

Curran

Hill

A. P.

(2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000138

27.

Dabney

K. P.

Tai

R. H.

Almarode

J. T.

Miller-Friedmann

J. L.

Sonnert

Sadler

P. M.

Hazari

(2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education Part B, 2(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.629455

28.

Damon

Menon

Cotton Bronk

(2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0703_2

29.

Darawsheh

(2014). Reflexivity in research: Promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 21(12), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.560

30.

DeWitz

S. J.

Woolsey

M. L.

Walsh

W. B.

(2009). College student retention: An exploration of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and purpose in life among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0049

31.

Dunne

(2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930

32.

Eccles

(2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368

33.

Elo

Kyngäs

(2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

34.

Erikson

E. H.

(1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company Inc.

35.

Fayer

Lacey

Watson

(2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future/pdf/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future.pdf

36.

Flowers

Banda

(2016). Cultivating science identity through sources of self-efficacy. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-01-2016-0014

37.

Fouad

N. A.

Santana

M. C.

(2017). SCCT and underrepresented populations in STEM fields: Moving the needle. Journal of Career Assessment, 25, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658324

38.

Franklin

(2013). A practical guide to gender diversity for computer science faculty. Synthesis Lectures on Professionalism and Career Advancement for Scientists and Engineers, 1, 1–81.

39.

Fry

Kennedy

Funk

(2021). STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial, and ethnic diversity. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/04/01/stem-jobs-see-uneven-progress-in-increasing-gender-racial-and-ethnic-diversity/

40.

Glaser

(1978). Theoretical sensitivity (vol.4). The Sociology Press.

41.

Grant

A. M.

(2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48

42.

Grossman

J. M.

Porche

M. V.

(2014). Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education, 49(6), 698–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913481364

43.

Gutowski

White

A. E.

Liang

Diamonti

A.-J.

Berado

(2018). How stress influences purpose development: The importance of social support. Journal of Adolescent Research, 33(5), 571–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558417737754

44.

Hansell

(1983). Student commitment and purpose in a private secondary school. Qualitative Sociology, 6(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00987086

45.

Hanson

S. L.

(2004). African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. NWSA Journal, 16, 96–115.

46.

Hill

P. L.

Burrow

A. L.

O’Dell

A. C.

Thornton

M. A.

(2010). Classifying adolescents’ conceptions of purpose in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(6), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.534488

47.

Hughes

R. M.

Nzekwe

Molyneaux

K. J.

(2013). The single sex debate for girls in science: A comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Research in Science Education, 43, 1979–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7

48.

Jackson

M. C.

Galvez

Landa

Buonora

Thoman

D. B.

(2017). Science that matters: The importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar42. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0067

49.

Karcher

(2014). Cross-age peer mentoring. In DuBois

D. L.

Karcher

M. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 233–258). Sage Publications, Inc.

50.

Kashdan

T. B.

McKnight

P. E.

(2009). Origins of purpose in life: Refining our understanding of a life well lived. Psihologijske Teme, 18(2), 303–313.

51.

Klein

(2017). Prosocial behavior increases perceptions of meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1209541

52.

Klein

Liang

Sepulveda

White

A. E.

(2019). MPOWER: An evidence-based youth purpose program. Journal of Character Education, 15(2), 103–113.

53.

Koizumi

Ito

Kaneko

Motohashi

(2008). Effect of having a sense of purpose in life on the risk of death from cardiovascular diseases. Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je2007388

54.

Kolb

D. A.

(1984). The process of experiential learning. In Jarvis

Griffin

(Eds.), Adult and continuing education: Major themes in education (pp. 20–38). Prentice Hall.

55.

Koshy

S. I.

Mariano

J. M.

(2011). Promoting youth purpose: A review of the literature. New Directions for Youth Development, 2011(132), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.425

56.

Kosine

N. R.

Steger

M. F.

Duncan

(2008). Purpose-centered career development: A strengths-based approach to finding meaning and purpose in careers. Professional School Counseling, 12(2), 2156759X0801200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759x0801200209

57.

Krishnamurthi

Ballard

Noam

G. G.

(2014). Examining the impact of afterschool STEM programs. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546628.pdf

58.

Levitt

H. M.

Bamberg

Creswell

J. W.

Frost

D. M.

Josselson

Suárez-Orozco

(2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

59.

Liang

Lund

Mousseau

White

A. E.

Spencer

Walsh

(2018). Adolescent girls finding purpose: The role of parents and prosociality. Youth & Society, 50(6), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x17697850

60.

Liang

White

Mousseau

A. M. D.

Hasse

Knight

Berado

Lund

T. J.

(2017). The four P’s of purpose among college bound students: People, propensity, passion, prosocial benefits. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1225118

61.

Lucas

(1997). Identity development, career development, and psychological separation from parents: Similarities and differences between men and women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.44.2.123

62.

Mahoney

J. L.

Larson

R. W.

Eccles

J. S.

(Eds.) (2005). Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs. Lawrence Erlbaum.

63.

Maltese

A. V.

Cooper

C. S.

(2017). STEM pathways: Do men and women differ in why they enter and exit? AERA Open, 3(3), 2332858417727276. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417727276

64.

McGee

Bentley

(2017). The equity ethic: Black and Latinx college students reengineering their STEM careers toward justice. American Journal of Education, 124(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/693954

65.

Merolla

D. M.

Serpe

R. T.

(2013). STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: The role of science identity salience. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 575–597.

66.

Milam

(2012). Girls and STEM education: A literature review. Georgia Institute of Technology.

67.

Morris

D. S.

(2015). Actively closing the gap? Social class, organized activities, and academic achievement in high school. Youth & Society, 47(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x12461159

68.

Morrow

S. L.

Smith

M. L.

(1995). Constructions of survival and coping by women who have survived childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.1.24

69.

Morse

J. M.

(2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501

70.

National Agricultural Library. (n.d.). Hydroponics. U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.nal.usda.gov/farms-and-agricultural-production-systems/hydroponics

71.

National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017 (Special Report No. NSF 17-310). https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/

72.

Noam

G. G.

Robertson

D. L.

Papazian

Guhn

(2014). The development of a brief measure for assessing science interest and engagement in children and youth: Structure, reliability and validity of the Common Instrument. Program in Education, Afterschool and Resiliency (PEAR), Harvard University.

73.

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Millett

M. A.

Memmott-Elison

M. K.

(2020). Can helping others strengthen teens? Character strengths as mediators between prosocial behavior and adolescents’ internalizing symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.001

74.

Pajares

(2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. Cambridge University Press.

75.

Park

C. L.

Pustejovsky

J. E.

Trevino

Sherman

A. C.

Esposito

Berendsen

Salsman

J. M.

(2019). Effects of psychosocial interventions on meaning and purpose in adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer, 125(14), 2383–2393. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32078

76.

Philp

K. D.

Gill

M. G.

(2020). Reframing after-school programs as developing youth interest, identity, and social capital. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219892647

77.

Pizzolato

J. E.

Brown

E. L.

Kanny

M. A.

(2011). Purpose plus: Supporting youth purpose, control, and academic achievement. New Directions for Youth Development, 2011(132), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.429

78.

Rittmayer

A. D.

Beier

M. E.

(2008). Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. SWE-AWE CASEE Overviews, 1(3), 12. http://aweonline.org/arp_selfefficacy_overview_122208.pdf

79.

Scales

P. C.

Benson

P. L.

Roehlkepartain

E. C.

(2011). Adolescent thriving: The role of sparks, relationships, and empowerment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9578-6

80.

Schultz

P. W.

Hernandez

P. R.

Woodcock

Estrada

Chance

R. C.

Aguilar

Serpe

R. T.

(2011). Patching the pipeline: Reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710392371

81.

Seidman

I. E.

(1991). Interviewing as qualitative research. Teachers College Press.

82.

Seymour

(1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Bioscience Education, 79(4), 437–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790406

83.

Snellman

Silva

J. M.

Frederick

C. B.

Putnam

R. D.

(2015). The engagement gap. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214548398

84.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.

85.

Sumner

Burrow

A. L.

Hill

P. L.

(2018). The development of purpose in life among adolescents who experience marginalization: Potential opportunities and obstacles. American Psychologist, 73(6), 740–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000249

86.

Tabernero

Hernández

(2012). A motivational model for environmentally responsible behavior. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 648-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38876

87.

Tan

Calabrese Barton

Kang

O’Neill

(2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21123

88.

Wang

M. T.

Degol

J. L.

(2017). Who chooses STEM careers? Using a relative cognitive strength and interest model to predict careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1805–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0618-8

89.

Waterman

A. S.

(1992). Identity as an aspect of optimal psychological functioning. In Adams

G. R.

Gullotta

T. P.

Montemayor

(Eds.), Adolescent identity formation: Advances in adolescent development (pp. 50–72). Sage.

90.

Weinburgh

M. H.

Steele

(2000). The modified attitudes toward science inventory: Developing an instrument to be used with fifth grade urban students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 6(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v6.i1.50

91.

Weinstein

Ryan

R. M.

(2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984

92.

White

A. E.

(2020). Purpose development in college students: Understanding the role of critical consciousness [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Boston College.

93.

Worthen

Johnson

Badore

Bentley

(1973). Adolescent adjustment related to the purpose in life test. Journal of Community Psychology, 1(2), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(197304)1:2<209::aid-jcop2290010216>3.0.co;2-2

94.

Xie

Fang

Shauman

(2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659

95.

Zeldin

A. L.

Pajares

(2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001215