The Gaokao, a mandatory postsecondary entrance examination for all Chinese students, is often associated with psychological stress among Chinese students in their final year of high school. This project was conducted in summer 2017 in urban Beijing and rural Xi’an, China. The purpose is to explore the perspectives of urban and rural secondary school graduates after they have completed the examination, using in-depth clinical interviews. The study draws on Self-Determination Theory and research on moral reasoning to examine several themes surrounding Chinese adolescents’ perceptions of the Gaokao, including general perceptions of the purpose of education, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, sources of support and pressure during study for the Gaokao, and issues of fairness and social inequality. The major findings are that students from all backgrounds reported psychological conflict regarding their general views of the aims of education and the extrinsic pressure deriving from the high-stakes Gaokao examination. Inequality was seen as further exacerbated by family background, resources, and quality of teaching. Urban parents tended to provide more support, both academic and interpersonal. Rural students rated their mental health as significantly lower than urban students during their senior year of high school.
AshA. (2016, October12). Is China’s Gaokao the world’s toughest school exam?The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com
2.
AssorA.RothG.DeciE. L. (2004). The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72, 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00256.x
3.
BaoX. H.LamS. F. (2008). Who makes the choice? Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. Child Development, 79, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01125.x
4.
BenwareC. A.DeciE. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004755
5.
BurkhoffA. (2015). One exam determines one’s life: The 2014 reforms to the Chinese national College entrance exam. Fordham International Law Journal, 38, 1473–1510.
6.
ChaoR. K.SueS. (1996). Chinese parental influence and their children’s school success: A paradox in the literature on parenting styles. In LauS. (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 93–120). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
7.
DaveyG.LianC. D.HigginsL. (2007). The university entrance examination system in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701625761
8.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
9.
EricsonD. P. (2012. June). Fairness and the cultivation of moral virtue in the educational system: The debilitating role of university entrance examinations in East Asia [Paper presentation]. Pacific Circle Consortium Meetings at Ewha University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
10.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.
11.
FuG.XuF.CameronC. A.HeymanG.LeeK. (2007). Cross-cultural differences in children’s choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies. Developmental Psychology, 43, 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.278
HelwigC. C.ArnoldM. L.TanD.BoydD. (2003). Chinese adolescents’ reasoning about democratic and authority-based decision making in peer, family, and school contexts. Child Development, 74, 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00568
14.
HelwigC. C.ToS.WangQ.LiuC.YangS. (2014). Judgments and reasoning about parental discipline involving induction and psychological control in China and Canada. Child Development, 85, 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12183
15.
HoD. Y. F. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In BondM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 155–165). Oxford University Press.
16.
JiaQ.EricsonD. P. (2017). Equity and access to higher education in China: Lessons from Hunan province for university admissions policy. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.011
17.
KneeC. R.UysalA. (2011). The role of autonomy in promoting healthy dyadic, familial, and parenting relationships across cultures. In ChirkovV.RyanR.SheldonK. M. (Eds.), Human autonomy in cultural contexts: Global perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and people’s well-being (pp. 95–110). New York: Springer.
LingM. (2017). Precious son, reliable daughter: Redefining son preference and parent-child relations in migrant households in urban China. The China Quarterly, 229, 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741016001570
20.
MaW. (2012). Why the rural poor get fewer opportunities to leading research universities?Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9201-x
21.
MaY.WangL. (2016). Fairness in admission: Voices from rural Chinese female students in selective universities in Chinese Mainland. Frontiers of Education in China, 11, 44–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397102
22.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.982
23.
ReeveJ.AssorA. (2011). Do social institutions necessarily suppress individuals’ needs for autonomy? The possibility of schools as autonomy-promoting contexts across the globe. In ChirkovV.RyanR.SheldonK. (Eds.), Personal autonomy in cultural contexts: Global perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and people’s well-being (pp. 111–132). New York: Springer.
24.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In ChirkovV.RyanR.SheldonK. M. (Eds.), Human autonomy in cultural contexts: Global perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and people’s well-being (pp. 45–64). New York: Springer.
25.
SheldonK. M.RyanR. (2011). Positive psychology and self-determination theory: A natural interface. In ChirkovV.RyanR.SheldonK. M. (Eds.), Human autonomy in cultural contexts: Global perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and people’s well-being (pp. 33–44). New York: Springer.
26.
SmithJ. A.OsbornM. (2004). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In BreakwellG. M. (Ed.), Doing social psychology research (pp. 229–254). New York: Blackwell.
27.
TsaiY.KunterM.LüdtkeO.TrautweinU.RyanR. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460
28.
WangH. (2011). Access to higher education in China: Differences in opportunity. Frontiers of Education in China, 6, 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0130-6
29.
WangX.LiuC.ZhangL.LuoR.GaubenT.ShiY.RozelleS.SharbonoR. (2011). College education and the poor in China: Documenting the hurdles to educational attainment and college matriculation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9155-z
30.
WangY.RossH. (2010). Experiencing the change and continuity of the college entrance examination. Chinese Education and Society, 43(4), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932430407
31.
WangY. C. (2014). In search of the Confucian family: Interviews with parents and their middle school children in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29, 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414538318
32.
WayN.OkazakiO.ZhaoJ.KimJ. J.ChenX.YoshikawaH.DengH. (2013). Social and emotional parenting: Mothering in a changing Chinese society. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031204
33.
WuD. Y. H. (1996). Parental control: Psychocultural interpretations of Chinese patterns of socialization. In LauS. (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 1–28). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
34.
YanC. (2015). “We can’t change much unless the exams change”: Teachers’ dilemmas in the curriculum reform in China. Improving Schools, 18(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214553744
35.
YaoS.WuB.SuF.WangJ. (2010). The impact of higher education expansion on social justice in China: A spatial and inter-temporal analysis. Journal of Contemporary China, 19, 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2010.508586
36.
ZhangG.ZhaoY.LeiJ. (2012). Between a rock and a hard place: Education reform and innovation in China. On the Horizon, 20, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121211272489
37.
ZhangW.FuligniA. J. (2006). Authority, autonomy, and family relationships among adolescents in urban and rural China. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00506.x
38.
ZhaoN.ValckeM.DesoeteA.VerhaegheJ. (2011). The quadratic relationship between socioeconomic status and learning performance in China by multilevel analysis: Implications for policies to foster education equity. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.08.004
39.
ZhouM.MaW. J.DeciE. L. (2009). The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children’s motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.003
