The current study examined sociodemographic characteristics and political discussion as correlates of adolescents’ qualitative understanding of three civic behaviors. Participants were 743 adolescents (Mage = 15.87, range = 13-20; 55.6% female; 89.9% White) from a midsized city and a small rural town in an Appalachian state. Open-ended responses to three civic behavior scenarios, asking participants why should people protest, vote, and volunteer were content coded (28 codes total). Anecdotal statements are provided to illustrate the variety of themes that emerged among adolescents’ written responses. Adolescents applied domain-specific reasons (moral, conventional, and personal) for specific types of civic behavior. Structural justifications were provided for all three civic behaviors, suggesting that many adolescents reason about the broader, structural impact of civic behaviors. In probit regression models, coding categories were differentially associated with adolescent demographic characteristics and political discussion. Findings offer insight into youth’s divergent understanding of different forms of civic responsibility and shed light on individual differences in youth’s developing civic beliefs.
BallardP. J. (2014). What motivates youth civic involvement?Journal of Adolescent Research, 29, 439-463.
2.
BallardP. J.CohenA. K.Littenberg-TobiasJ. (2016). Action civics for promoting civic development: Main effects of program participation and differences by project characteristics. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58, 377-390.
3.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
4.
De VriesH.ElliottM. N.KanouseD. E.TelekiS. S. (2008). Using pooled kappa to summarize interrater agreement across many items. Field Methods, 20, 272-282.
5.
DiemerM. A.RapaL. J. (2016). Unraveling the complexity of critical consciousness, political efficacy, and political action among marginalized adolescents. Child Development, 87, 221-238.
6.
FlanaganC. A. (2004). Volunteerism, leadership, political socialization, and civic engagement. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 721-745). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
7.
FlanaganC. A.FaisonN. (2002). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Social Policy Report, 15, 1-16.
8.
GastilJ.XenosM. (2010). Of attitudes and engagement: Clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation. Journal of Communication, 60, 318-343.
9.
GinwrightS.CammarotaJ. (2002). New terrain in youth development: The promise of a social justice approach. Social justice, 29, 82-95.
HartD.DonnellyT. M.YounissJ.AtkinsR. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 197-219.
12.
HeJ.van de VijverF. J. (2015). Bridging etic and emic approaches in cross-cultural management research. In HoldenN.MichailovaS.TietzeS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to cross-cultural management (pp. 189-197). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HelwigC. (1998). Children’s conceptions of fair government and freedom of speech. Child Development, 69, 518-531.
14.
JaffeeS.HydeJ. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 703-726.
15.
KahneJ. E.MiddaughE. (2008). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school (Circle Working Paper 59). Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503646.pdf
16.
KahneJ. E.SporteS. E. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 738-766.
17.
KahneJ. E.WestheimerJ. (1996). In the service of what?Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 592-599.
18.
KeeterS.ZukinC.AndolinaM.JenkinsK. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational portrait. College Park: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning & Engagement, University of Maryland.
19.
KohlbergL. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In MischelT. (Ed.), Psychology and genetic epistemology (pp. 151-235). New York, NY: Academic Press.
20.
MatsubaM. K.HartD.AtkinsR. (2007). Psychological and social-structural influences on commitment to volunteering. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 889-907.
21.
McIntoshH.HartD.YounissJ. (2007). The influence of family political discussion on youth civic development: Which parent qualities matter?PS: Political Science & Politics, 40, 495-499.
22.
MetzE.McLellanJ.YounissJ. (2003). Types of voluntary service and adolescents’ civic development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 188-203.
23.
MetzgerA.AlvisL. M.OosterhoffB.BabskieE.SyvertsenA.Wray-LakeL. (2018). The intersection of emotional and sociocognitive competencies with civic engagement in middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1663-1683.
24.
MetzgerA.FerrisK. (2013). Adolescents’ domain-specific judgments about different forms of civic involvement: Variations by age and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 529-538. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.003
25.
MetzgerA.OosterhoffB.PalmerC.FerrisK. (2014). Dimensions of citizenship: Associations among adolescents’ sociopolitical values and civic judgments. Political Science & Politics, 47, 443-448.
26.
MetzgerA.SmetanaJ. G. (2009). Adolescent civic and political engagement: Associations between domain-specific judgments and behavior. Child Development, 80, 433-441. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01270.x
27.
MetzgerA.SmetanaJ. G. (2010). Social cognitive development and adolescent civic engagement. In SherrodL. R.Torney-PurtaJ.FlanaganC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 221-248). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
28.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). Mplus users guide (Computer software and manual). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
29.
NiemiR. G.SobieszekB. I. (1977). Political socialization. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 209-233.
30.
NucciL. P. (1996). Morality and personal freedom. In ReedE. S.TurielE.BrownT. (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 41-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
NucciL. P.GuerraN.LeeJ. (1991). Adolescent judgments of the personal, prudential, and normative aspects of drug usage. Developmental Psychology, 27, 841-848.
32.
OosterhoffB.MetzgerA.BabskieE. (2015). What do citizens have to do? Parents’ and adolescents’ messages about civic duty. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 365-389.
33.
Sanchez-JankowskiM. (2002). Minority youth and civic engagement: The impact of group relations. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 237-245.
34.
ShahD. V.ChoJ.EvelandW. P.Jr.KwakN. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531-565.
35.
SmetanaJ. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119-153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
ThorisdottirH.JostJ. T.LiviatanI.ShroutP. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 175-203.
37.
TullettA. M.HartW. P.FeinbergM.FettermanZ. J.GottliebS. (2016). Is ideology the enemy of inquiry? Examining the link between political orientation and lack of interest in novel data. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 123-132.
38.
TurielE. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
VerbaS.BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L. (2003). Unequal at the starting line: Creating participatory inequalities across generations and among groups. The American Sociologist, 34, 45-69.
40.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
WalkerL. J. (2006). Gender and morality. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 93-115). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
42.
WalkerT. (2000). The service/politics split: Rethinking service to teach political engagement. Political Science & Politics, 33, 646-649.
43.
WalkerT. (2002). Service as a pathway to political participation: What research tells us. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 183-188.
44.
WattsR. J.DiemerM. A.VoightA. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. In FlanaganC. A.ChristensB. D. (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development (pp. 43-57). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
WattsR. J.FlanaganC. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779-792.
46.
WattsR. J.Hipolito-DelgadoC. P. (2015). Thinking ourselves to liberation? Advancing sociopolitical action in critical consciousness. The Urban Review, 47, 847-867.
47.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). Educating the “good” citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. Political Science & Politics, 37, 241-247.
48.
Wray-LakeL.HartD. (2012). Growing social inequalities in youth civic engagement? Evidence from the National Election Study. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45, 456-461.
49.
Wray-LakeL.MetzgerA.SyvertsenA. K. (2017). Testing multidimensional models of youth civic engagement: Model comparisons, measurement invariance, and age differences. Applied Developmental Science, 21, 266-284.
50.
ZaffJ. F.MooreK. A.PapilloA. R.WilliamsS. (2003). Implications of extracurricular activity participation during adolescence on positive outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 599-630.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
