This study uses a mixed-method sequential exploratory design to examine influences on urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school. First, we interviewed 22 middle and high school students who varied in their level of engagement and disengagement. Support from adults and peers, opportunities to make choices, and external incentives aligned with greater engagement. In contrast, a strict disciplinary structure, an irrelevant and boring curriculum, disengaged peers, and lack of respect by adults coincided with greater disengagement. From these interviews, we tested whether these factors were statistically significant predictors of engagement and disengagement in a sample of 611 middle and high school students. In the majority of models, these predictors were significantly related to engagement and disengagement in the expected direction. Implications of findings for educational practice are discussed.
BakerJ. A.GrantS.MorlockL. (2008). The teacher-student relationship as a development context for children with externalizing or internalizing behavioral problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 3-15. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.3
2.
BalfanzR.HerzogL.Mac IverD. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in the urban middle grade schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223-235. doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621079
3.
BaraldiA. N.EndersC. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5-37. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001
4.
BennerA. D.GrahamS. (2009). The transition to high school as a developmental process among multiethnic urban youth. Child Development, 80, 356-376. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01265.x
5.
BerendsM. (2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 159-180.
6.
BettsJ. R.TangE. Y. (2016). A metanalysis of the literature on the effects of charter schools on engagement. Paper given at the SREE National Conference, Washington, DC.
7.
BrandS.FelnerR.ShimM.SeitsingerA.DumasT. (2003). Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school-level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 570-588. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.570
8.
BrewsterA. B.BowenG. L. (2004). Teacher support and the school engagement of Latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21, 47-67. doi:10.1023/B:CASW.0000012348.83939.6b
9.
ChristensonS.ReschlyA.WylieC. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.
10.
ChurchM.ElliotA.GableS. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43-54. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.43
11.
ConnellJ. P.WellbornJ. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In GunnarM.SroufeL. A. (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 23) (pp. 43-77). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
12.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003) Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (Oxford library of psychology) (pp. 85-107). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
DottererA. M.WehrspannE. (2016). Parent involvement and academic outcomes among urban adolescents: Examining the role of school engagement. Educational Psychology, 36, 812-830. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1099617
16.
DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. (Eds.). (2014). Withering opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
EcclesJ. S.RoeserR. W. (2013). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 125-153). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780471726746.ch5.
18.
EricksonK.StullD. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Warning and advice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
FineM. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
FredricksJ. A. (2014). Eight myths of student disengagement: Creating classrooms of deep learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
21.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
22.
FredricksJ. A.FilseckerM.LawsonM. (2016). Student engagement and learning: Theoretical and methodological advances. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-84.
23.
FredricksJ. A.WangM.SchallJ.HokfkensT.SnugH.ParrA.AllertonJ. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5-15. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
24.
FurrerC. J.SkinnerE. A.PitzerJ. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday resilience. In ShernoffD. J.BempechatJ. (Eds.), National society for the study of education yearbook: Engaging youth in schools: Empirically-based models to guide future innovations (Vol. 113, pp. 101-123). New York, NY: Columbia University.
25.
Garcia-ReidP.ReidR. J.PetersonN. A. (2005). School engagement among Latino youth in an urban middle school context valuing the role of social support. Education and Urban Society, 37, 257-275. doi:10.1177/0013124505275534
26.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27.
GottfredsonG. D.GottfredsonD. C.PayneA. A.GottfredsonN. C. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 412-444. doi:10.1177/0022427804271931
28.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed methods evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274. doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
29.
GregoryA.SkibaR. J.NogueraP. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin. Educational Research, 39, 59-68.
30.
HeppenJ. B.TherriaultS. B. (2008). Deveoping early warning systems to identify potential high school dropouts. Washington, DC: The National High School Center at the American Institutes for Research.
31.
JangH.KimE. J.ReeveJ. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
32.
JanoszM.ArchambaultI.MorizotJ.PaganiL. S. (2008). School engagement trajectories and their differential predictive relations to dropout. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 21-40. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00546.x
33.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
34.
JohnsonS. L. (2009). Improving the school environment to reduce school violence: A review of the literature. Journal of School Health, 79, 451-465. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00435.x
35.
JuvonenJ.EspinosaC.KnifsendC. A. (2012). The role of peer relationships on academic and extracurricular engagement in school. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research in student engagement (pp. 387-402). London, England: Springer.
36.
KarabenickS. A.WoolleyM. E.FriedelJ. M.AmmonB. V.BlazevskiJ.BonneyC. R.. . . KellyK. L. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean?Educational Psychologist, 42, 139-151. doi:10.1080/00461520701416231
37.
KlemA. M.ConnellJ. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262-273. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
38.
LaddG. W.EttekalI.Kochenderfer-LaddB. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school: Differential pathways for children’s school engagement and achievement?Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 826-841. doi:10.1037/edu0000177
39.
Ladson-BillingG. (1994). The dreamkeepers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometric, 33, 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310
41.
LanghoutR. D.MitchellC. A. (2008). Engaging contexts: Drawing the link between student and teacher experiences and the hidden curriculum. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 593-614. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
42.
LiY.LernerR. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47, 233-247. doi:10.1037/a0021307
43.
MartinJ. A.DowsonM. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327-365. doi:10.3102/0034654308325583
44.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. A.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.. . . UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scale. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
45.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
MitraD. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development?Teachers College Record, 106, 651-688. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00354.x
48.
MitraD. (2009). Collaborating with students: Building youth-adult partnerships in school. American Journal of Education, 115, 407-436. doi:10.1086/597488
49.
MurrayC. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 376-404. doi:10.1177/0272431608322940
50.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2016). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups, 2016. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016007.pdf
51.
National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52.
NiemiecC.RyanR. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144.
53.
NogueraP. (2003a). Schools, prisons, and the social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory Into Practice, 42, 341-350. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4204_12
54.
NogueraP. (2003b). The trouble with black boys: The role and influence of environmental and cultural factors on the academic performance of African American males. Urban Education, 38, 431-459. doi:10.1177/0042085903038004005
55.
OkonofuaJ. A.WaltonG. M.EberhardtJ. L. (2016). A vicious cycle: A social-psychological account of extreme racial disparities in school discipline. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 381-398. doi:10.1177/1745691616635592
56.
OsborneJ. W.WalkerC. (2006). Stereotype threat, identification with academics, and withdrawal from school: Why the most successful students of colour might be most likely to withdraw. Educational Psychology, 26, 563-577. doi:10.1080/01443410500342518
57.
PatrickB. C.SkinnerE. A.ConnellJ. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781-791. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781
58.
PatrickH.RyanA. M.KaplanA. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83-98. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
59.
PatallE. A.SteingutR. R.Steingut TrimbleS. S.PituchK. A. (2016). Daily interest, engagement, and autonomy support in the high school science classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 180-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.06.002
60.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In MurnaneR.DuncanG. (Eds.), Withering opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91-116). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
62.
ReeveJ. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7.
63.
ReeveJ. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579-595. doi:10.1037/a0032690
64.
ReeveJ.JangH. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
65.
ReeveJ.JangH.CarrellD.JeonS.BarchJ. (2004). Enhancing high school students’ engagement by increasing their teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147-169. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
66.
RumbergerR. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
RyanA. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101-111. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_4
68.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
69.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
70.
Salmela-AroK.UpadyayaK. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of a demands-resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 137-151.
71.
SchaefferN. (1980). Evaluating race-of-interviewer effects in a national survey. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 400-419.
72.
SkinnerE. A.FurrerC. J.MarchandG.KindermannT. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765-781. doi:10.1037/a0012840
73.
SkinnerE. A.KindermannT. A.ConnellJ. P.WellbornJ. G. (2009). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. In WentzelK.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223-245). Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
SkinnerE. A.PitzerJ. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). New York, NY: Springer.
75.
SteinM.KinderD.SilbertJ.CarnineD. W. (2005). Designing effective math instruction: A direct instruction approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
76.
TolanP. H.DeutschN. L. (2015). Mixed methods in developmental science. In OvertonW.F.MolenaarP. C. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Vol. 1: Theory and method (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 713-757). New York, NY: John Wiley.
77.
UrdanT.SchoenfelderE. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.003
78.
VoelklK. E. (2012). School identification. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 193-218). New York, NY: Springer.
79.
WallaceT. L.ChhuonV. (2014). Proximal processes in urban classrooms: Engagement and disaffection in urban youth of color. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 937-973. doi:10.3102/0002831214531324
80.
WangM. T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1643-1657. doi:10.1037/a0027247
81.
WangM. T.DegolJ. L. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 137-143.
82.
WangM. T.DegolJ. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 315-352. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
83.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2012a). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 31-39. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
84.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2012b). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83, 877-895. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
85.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
86.
WangM. T.FredricksJ. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement and youth problem behavior during adolescence. Child Development, 85, 722-737. doi:10.1111/cdev.12138
87.
WangM. T.FredricksJ. A.YeF.HofkensT.SchallJ. (2017). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A multidimensional perspective. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1, 13-24.
88.
WangM. T.HolcombeR. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 633-662. doi:10.3102/0002831209361209
89.
WangM. T.KiuruN.DegolJ. L.Salmela-AroK. (2018). Friends, academic achievement, and school engagement during adolescence: A social network approach to peer influence and selection effects. Learning and Instruction, 58, 148-160.
90.
WangM. T.PeckS. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1266-1276.
91.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ.FredricksJ.SimpkinsS.RoeserR.SchiefeleU. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In LernerR. (Series Ed.) & Garcia CollC.LambM. (Volume Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 7th Ed. Vol. 3, Social, and emotional development (pp. 657-699).
92.
WentzelK. R. (2009). Peer relationships and motivation at school. In RubinK.BukowskiW.LaursenB. (Eds.), Handbook on peer relationships (pp. 531-547). New York, NY: Guilford.
93.
YoshikawaH.WeisnerT.KalilA.WayN. (2013). Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: Uses and methodological choices. Qualitative Psychology, 1, 3-18. doi:10.1037/2326-3598.1.S.3
