Have You Asked for It? An Exploratory Study About Maltese Adolescents’ Use of Ask.fm

Abstract

This article focuses on adolescents’ use of anonymous social networking sites (SNSs). Their perceptions and attitudes toward one such platform, Ask.fm, are discussed using the framework of uses and gratifications theory to explore motivations for using it. Four focus groups and four interviews were carried out with 22 Maltese adolescents (10 female and 12 male) aged 11 to 16 years. Thematic analysis of data collected was undertaken to identify and develop themes relevant to Ask.fm use. Findings indicate that the platform is a space where adolescents interact with others as part of their identity exploration. The role of anonymity was salient throughout. Ask.fm users were aware of the risks related to using the site; yet, the possibilities for fun, peer acceptance, and identity exploration may be driving them to experiment with this risky behavior. The implications arising from these exploratory findings may be applicable to other anonymous SNSs.

Keywords

adolescence social media uses and gratifications identity development anonymity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

Gosling

Weinman

Marteau

(1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31, 597-606.

Arnett

J. J.

(1995). Adolescents’ uses of media for self-socialization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 519-533.

Arnett

J. J.

(2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ask.fm changes hands once again. (2016, July 4). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36702766

ASKfm updates Q&A app to attract millennials. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.netimperative.com/2016/01/askfm-updates-qa-app-to-attract-millennials/

Binns

(2013). Facebook’s ugly sisters: Anonymity and abuse on formspring and Ask.fm. Media Education Research Journal, 4, 27-41. Retrieved from http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/8378/1/8378_binns.pdf

Binns

(2014). Twitter city and Facebook village: Teenage girls’ personas and experiences influenced by choice architecture in social networking sites. Journal of Media Practice, 15, 71-91. doi:10.1080/14682753.2014.960763

Blake

. (2015). Ask.fm owners “considered shutting down” social network. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/31249209

boyd

(2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Macarthur Foundation Series on Digital learning–Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119-142). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1518924

10.

boyd

(2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

11.

boyd

d. m.

Ellison

N. B.

(2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

12.

Bradley

(2005). Internet lives: Social context and moral domain in adolescent development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005, 57-76. doi:10.1002/yd.142

13.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

14.

Brown

J. D.

(2000). Adolescents’ sexual media diets. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 35-40. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00141-5

15.

Dunne

Á.

Lawlor

M. A.

Rowley

(2010). Young people’s use of online social networking sites—A uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4, 46-58. doi:10.1108/17505931011033551

16.

Erikson

(1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

17.

Hosseinmardi

Rafiq

R. I.

Yang

Han

Mishra

(2014). A comparison of common users across Instagram and Ask.fm to better understand cyberbullying (arXiv:1408.4882 [cs]). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4882

18.

Katz

Blumler

J. G.

Gurevitch

(1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509-523. doi:10.1086/268109

19.

Kroger

(2015). Identity in childhood and adolescence. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 11, 2nd ed., pp. 537-542). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

20.

Manago

A. M.

(2015). Media and the development of identity. In Scott

Kosslyn

(Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1-14). John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118900772

21.

Manago

A. M.

Guan

S. A.

Greenfield

(2015). New media, social change, and human development from adolescence through the transition to adulthood. In Jensen

L. A.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human development and culture: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 519-534). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

22.

McQuail

(1994). Mass communication theory: An introduction. London, England: SAGE.

23.

McQuail

(2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory (5th ed.). New Delhi, India: SAGE.

24.

Michikyan

Subrahmanyam

(2012). Social networking sites: Implications for youth. In Yan

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of cyber behavior (pp. 132-147). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

25.

Perez

(2014, August 14). IAC Agrees to work with regulators on cyberbullying protections following Ask.fm deal. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/14/ask-com-agrees-to-work-with-regulators-on-cyberbullying-protections-following-ask-fm-acquisition/

26.

Peter

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2011). Adolescents’ online privacy: Toward a developmental perspective. In Trepte

Reinecke

(Eds.), Privacy online (pp. 221-234). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

27.

Peter

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2013). The effects of internet communication on adolescents’ psychological development. An assessment of risks and opportunities. In Valdivia

A. N.

(Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media studies (pp. 678-697). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems136

28.

Pollak

(2014, November 19). Ask.fm promises anonymity with responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/ask-fm-promises-anonymity-with-responsibility-1.2006117

29.

Raskauskas

Stoltz

A. D.

(2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-575. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564

30.

Roberts

D. F.

Henriksen

Foehr

U. G.

(2004). Adolescents and media. In Lerner

R. M.

Steinberg

(Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 487-521). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

31.

Ruggiero

T. E.

(2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 3-37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02

32.

Salimkhan

Manago

A. M.

Greenfield

P. M.

(2010). The construction of the virtual self on myspace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), Article 1. Retrieved from https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4231/3275

33.

Šmahel

Wright

M. F.

(Eds.). (2014). Meaning of online problematic situations for children: Results of qualitative cross-cultural investigation in nine European countries. London, England: EU Kids Online, The London School of Economics and Political Science.

34.

Steele

J. R.

Brown

J. D.

(1995). Adolescent room culture: Studying media in the context of everyday life. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 551-576.

35.

Steinberg

Morris

A. S.

(2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83-110. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83

36.

Subrahmanyam

Šmahel

(2011). Digital youth: The role of media in development. New York, NY: Springer.

37.

Suler

(2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321-326. doi:10.1089/1094931041291295

38.

Sundar

S. S.

Limperos

A. M.

(2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504-525. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827

39.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 121-127.

40.

van Dijck

. (2013). “You have one identity”: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 199-215. doi:10.1177/0163443712468605

41.

Vásquez

(2014). “Usually not one to complain but…”: Constructing identities in user-generated online reviews. In Seargeant

Tagg

(Eds.), The language of social media (pp. 65-90). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

42.

Vaughan

(2013). Technology—Girls suffer on site “made for bullying.” The Times Educational Supplement Scotland, 2332, 14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1444758894?accountid=27934

43.

Vossen

H. G. M.

Piotrowski

J. T.

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2014). Media use and effects in childhood. In Nussbaum

J. F.

(Ed.), The handbook of lifespan communication (pp. 93-112). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

44.

Whiting

Williams

(2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16, 362-369. doi:10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041